World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
18095
World Ranking
9474
National Ranking
4010

William Enck publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Enck sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 129 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

William Enck D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Enck sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

William Enck is affiliated with North Carolina State University in the United States. Their research is concentrated within the field of Computer Science, including subfields such as Information Systems, Signal Processing, Computer Networks and Communications, Artificial Intelligence, and Software.

Their scholarly contributions address multiple topics, with significant work in:

  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Information and Cyber Security
  • Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Security and Verification in Computing
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies

William Enck's recent published papers include:

  • Top Five Challenges in Software Supply Chain Security: Observations From 30 Industry and Government Organizations, 2022, IEEE Security & Privacy
  • Software Bills of Materials Are Required. Are We There Yet?, 2023, IEEE Security & Privacy
  • Research Directions in Software Supply Chain Security, 2025, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
  • PolyScope: Multi-Policy Access Control Analysis to Triage Android Scoped Storage, 2023, IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
  • How Quickly Do Development Teams Update Their Vulnerable Dependencies?, 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent coauthors collaborating with William Enck include:

  • Laurie Williams
  • Yasemin Acar
  • Alexandros Kapravelos
  • Michel Cukier
  • Christian Kästner

Their research has been published predominantly in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Security & Privacy
  • ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
  • IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing

William Enck achieved the designation of ACM Senior Member in 2019.

Best Publications

  • TaintDroid: An Information-Flow Tracking System for Realtime Privacy Monitoring on Smartphones

    William Enck;Peter Gilbert;Seungyeop Han;Vasant Tendulkar

  • TaintDroid: an information-flow tracking system for realtime privacy monitoring on smartphones

    William Enck;Peter Gilbert;Byung-Gon Chun;Landon P. Cox

  • Semantically rich application-centric security in Android

    Machigar Ongtang;Stephen McLaughlin;William Enck;Patrick McDaniel

  • On lightweight mobile phone application certification

    William Enck;Machigar Ongtang;Patrick McDaniel

  • A study of android application security

    William Enck;Damien Octeau;Patrick McDaniel;Swarat Chaudhuri

  • Understanding Android Security

    W. Enck;M. Ongtang;P. McDaniel

  • AppsPlayground: automatic security analysis of smartphone applications

    Vaibhav Rastogi;Yan Chen;William Enck

  • WHYPER: towards automating risk assessment of mobile applications

    Rahul Pandita;Xusheng Xiao;Wei Yang;William Enck

  • TaintDroid: an information flow tracking system for real-time privacy monitoring on smartphones

    William Enck;Peter Gilbert;Byung-Gon Chun;Landon P. Cox

  • Exploiting open functionality in SMS-capable cellular networks

    William Enck;Patrick Traynor;Patrick McDaniel;Thomas La Porta

  • AppContext: differentiating malicious and benign mobile app behaviors using context

    Wei Yang;Xusheng Xiao;Benjamin Andow;Sihan Li

  • MAST: triage for market-scale mobile malware analysis

    Saurabh Chakradeo;Bradley Reaves;Patrick Traynor;William Enck

  • TARP: Ticket-based address resolution protocol

    Wesam Lootah;William Enck;Patrick McDaniel

  • A Study of Security Vulnerabilities on Docker Hub

    Rui Shu;Xiaohui Gu;William Enck

  • Limiting Sybil Attacks in Structured P2P Networks

    H. Rowaihy;W. Enck;P. McDaniel;T. La Porta

  • Defending users against smartphone apps: techniques and future directions

    William Enck

  • Mitigating attacks on open functionality in SMS-capable cellular networks

    Patrick Traynor;W. Enck;P. McDaniel;T. La Porta

  • Mitigating attacks on open functionality in SMS-capable cellular networks

    Patrick Traynor;William Enck;Patrick McDaniel;Thomas La Porta

  • ASM: a programmable interface for extending android security

    Stephan Heuser;Adwait Nadkarni;William Enck;Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi

  • Configuration management at massive scale: system design and experience

    W. Enck;T. Moyer;P. McDaniel;S. Sen

  • Exploiting open functionality in SMS-capable cellular networks

    Patrick Traynor;William Enck;Patrick Mcdaniel;Thomas La Porta

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick McDaniel
Patrick McDaniel University of Wisconsin–Madison
Patrick Traynor
Patrick Traynor University of Florida
Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi
Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi Technical University of Darmstadt
Tao Xie
Tao Xie Peking University
Kevin R. B. Butler
Kevin R. B. Butler University of Florida
Trent Jaeger
Trent Jaeger Pennsylvania State University
Peng Ning
Peng Ning Google (United States)
Ninghui Li
Ninghui Li Purdue University West Lafayette
Michael K. Reiter
Michael K. Reiter Duke University
Xiaohui Gu
Xiaohui Gu North Carolina State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to several related STEM fields, many of which now offer flexible online degree options. Students interested in engineering can benefit from understanding mechanical engineering degree online cost to compare tuition and program affordability before making a commitment.

If you’re considering a foundation in the sciences, you might wonder, can you get a physics degree online? The answer is yes—many universities now offer comprehensive online physics programs that blend theoretical learning with virtual labs, aimed at busy professionals or remote learners.

Data science is another rapidly growing area for tech-savvy students. Researching the cheapest data science degree options can help you find high-quality, budget-friendly online programs in this in-demand discipline.

For those interested in electronics, looking into the top online electrical engineering schools in the USA is a wise move. These programs offer robust technical skills while allowing you to study from anywhere.

Choosing the right online degree in a related field can broaden your career options, lower costs, and enhance your skills for future tech opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing William Enck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles