World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
57
Citations
13933
World Ranking
3812
National Ranking
4

Jacques Klein publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacques Klein sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 236 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jacques Klein D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacques Klein sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jacques Klein is affiliated with the University of Luxembourg in Luxembourg. Their research primarily falls within the domain of Computer Science, with a total of 344 publications. The subfields most closely associated with their work include Information Systems, Software, Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing, and Computer Networks and Communications.

Their scholarly output covers a range of topics including Advanced Malware Detection Techniques, Software Engineering Research, Software Testing and Debugging Techniques, Software Reliability and Analysis Research, Network Security and Intrusion Detection, Topic Modeling, and Software System Performance and Reliability.

Jacques Klein's publication record spans multiple venues. The most frequent publication venues are:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
  • Empirical Software Engineering
  • Journal of Systems and Software
  • IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Jacques Klein are:

  • "Is ChatGPT the Ultimate Programming Assistant -- How far is it?" (2023), published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "A critical review on the evaluation of automated program repair systems" (2020), published in Journal of Systems and Software
  • "On the Impact of Sample Duplication in Machine-Learning-Based Android Malware Detection" (2021), published in ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
  • "A Comparison of Pre-Trained Language Models for Multi-Class Text Classification in the Financial Domain" (2021), published in Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021
  • "JuCify" (2022), published in Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Jacques Klein include:

  • Tegawendé F. Bissyandé
  • Jordan Samhi
  • Li Li
  • Haoye Tian
  • Kevin Allix

Best Publications

  • FlowDroid: precise context, flow, field, object-sensitive and lifecycle-aware taint analysis for Android apps

    Steven Arzt;Siegfried Rasthofer;Christian Fritz;Eric Bodden

  • AndroZoo: collecting millions of Android apps for the research community

    Kevin Allix;Tegawende F. Bissyande;Jacques Klein;Yves Le Traon

  • IccTA: detecting inter-component privacy leaks in Android apps

    Li Li;Alexandre Bartel;Tegawende F. Bissyande;Jacques Klein

  • Effective inter-component communication mapping in Android with Epicc: an essential step towards holistic security analysis

    Damien Octeau;Patrick McDaniel;Somesh Jha;Alexandre Bartel

  • Static analysis of android apps

    Li Li;Tegawend F. Bissyand;Mike Papadakis;Siegfried Rasthofer

  • FixMiner: Mining relevant fix patterns for automated program repair

    Anil Koyuncu;Kui Liu;Tegawendé François D Assise Bissyande;Dongsun Kim

  • Dexpler: converting Android Dalvik bytecode to Jimple for static analysis with Soot

    Alexandre Bartel;Jacques Klein;Yves Le Traon;Martin Monperrus

  • Automated and Scalable T-wise Test Case Generation Strategies for Software Product Lines

    Gilles Perrouin;Sagar Sen;Jacques Klein;Benoit Baudry

  • Bypassing the Combinatorial Explosion: Using Similarity to Generate and Prioritize T-Wise Test Configurations for Software Product Lines

    Christopher Henard;Mike Papadakis;Gilles Perrouin;Jacques Klein

  • Automated Testing of Android Apps: A Systematic Literature Review

    Pingfan Kong;Li Li;Jun Gao;Kui Liu

  • Dexpler: Converting Android Dalvik Bytecode to Jimple for Static Analysis with Soot

    Alexandre Bartel;Jacques Klein;Martin Monperrus;Yves Le Traon

  • Automatically securing permission-based software by reducing the attack surface: an application to Android

    Alexandre Bartel;Jacques Klein;Yves Le Traon;Martin Monperrus

  • Got issues? Who cares about it? A large scale investigation of issue trackers from GitHub

    Tegawende F. Bissyande;David Lo;Lingxiao Jiang;Laurent Reveillere

  • Understanding Android App Piggybacking: A Systematic Study of Malicious Code Grafting

    Li Li;Daoyuan Li;Tegawende F. Bissyande;Jacques Klein

  • Pairwise testing for software product lines: comparison of two approaches

    Gilles Perrouin;Sebastian Oster;Sagar Sen;Jacques Klein

  • Aspect-oriented multi-view modeling

    Jörg Kienzle;Wisam Al Abed;Jacques Klein

  • DroidRA: taming reflection to support whole-program analysis of Android apps

    Li Li;Tegawendé F. Bissyandé;Damien Octeau;Jacques Klein

  • Is ChatGPT the Ultimate Programming Assistant - How far is it?

    Unknown

  • Semantic-based weaving of scenarios

    Jacques Klein;Loïc Hélouët;Jean-Marc Jézéquel

  • An Investigation into the Use of Common Libraries in Android Apps

    Li Li;Tegawende F. Bissyande;Jacques Klein;Yves Le Traon

  • Empirical assessment of machine learning-based malware detectors for Android

    Kevin Allix;Tegawendé F. Bissyandé;Quentin Jérome;Jacques Klein

Frequent Co-Authors

Yves Le Traon
Yves Le Traon University of Luxembourg
Tegawendé F. Bissyandé
Tegawendé F. Bissyandé University of Luxembourg
Jean-Marc Jézéquel
Jean-Marc Jézéquel University of Rennes
Martin Monperrus
Martin Monperrus Royal Institute of Technology
Mike Papadakis
Mike Papadakis University of Luxembourg
David Lo
David Lo Singapore Management University
Benoit Baudry
Benoit Baudry University of Montreal
Patrick McDaniel
Patrick McDaniel University of Wisconsin–Madison
Eric Bodden
Eric Bodden University of Paderborn
Franck Fleurey
Franck Fleurey Tellu IoT AS

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can open new doors for those interested in computer science careers. Many students choose to start with an online associate degree as a flexible and cost-effective way to gain foundational knowledge before transferring to a bachelor’s program or pursuing technical roles.

If you’re looking to advance your education quickly, consider the quickest cheapest masters degree options available online. These accelerated programs are a great fit for working professionals who want to upskill without putting their careers on hold.

Choosing the right graduate program is essential for your career trajectory. Do some research to find the best masters degree to get in computer science and technology—programs that are both in-demand and offer a strong return on investment.

Budget is a key consideration for many. Fortunately, you can reduce your financial burden by selecting one of the cheapest online college options without sacrificing quality. This makes pursuing a computer science degree in the USA more accessible to a diverse range of students.

Best Scientists Citing Jacques Klein

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles