World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 60 3236 3142 433 430 326 14547

Xiapu Luo publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Xiapu Luo between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Xiapu Luo published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 20.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 73 publications in 2023. 133 of the 510 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 73. Peak 73 publications in 2023. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 4 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 11 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 24 publications 2020: 48 publications 2021: 63 publications 2022: 46 publications 2023: 73 publications 2024: 72 publications 2025: 61 publications
2001 2025

510 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Xiapu Luo: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 2
2003 0
2004 1
2005 4
2006 1
2007 3
2008 1
2009 11
2010 6
2011 13
2012 7
2013 6
2014 12
2015 5
2016 12
2017 17
2018 21
2019 24
2020 48
2021 63
2022 46
2023 73
2024 72
2025 61
Total 510
Download as CSV

Xiapu Luo publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xiapu Luo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 322–331 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 326 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206 326
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Xiapu Luo D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xiapu Luo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337 60
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Xiapu Luo is affiliated with Hong Kong Polytechnic University in China, with a research focus primarily in computer science. Their work spans multiple subfields including information systems, artificial intelligence, signal processing, computer networks and communications, and software engineering.

The scientist's research concentrates on topics such as advanced malware detection techniques, blockchain technology applications and security, software engineering research, software testing and debugging techniques, spam and phishing detection, network security and intrusion detection, and security and verification in computing.

Among the frequent co-authors collaborating with Xiapu Luo are Haoyu Wang, Yajin Zhou, Ting Chen, Lei Wu, and Yutian Tang.

Their recent notable publications include:

  • Large Language Models for Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review (2024), published in ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
  • Defining Smart Contract Defects on Ethereum (2020), published in IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
  • Understanding Ethereum via Graph Analysis (2020), published in ACM Transactions on Internet Technology
  • DefectChecker: Automated Smart Contract Defect Detection by Analyzing EVM Bytecode (2021), published in IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
  • Large Language Models for Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review (2023), published on arXiv (Cornell University)

Xiapu Luo has contributed extensively to publication venues including arXiv (Cornell University), IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, and IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
  • IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
  • ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
  • IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security

In terms of book publications, Xiapu Luo has published works with Springer Science+Business Media, including the titles "Blockchain and Trustworthy Systems" released in 2021 and 2022.

  • Blockchain and Trustworthy Systems (2021)
  • Blockchain and Trustworthy Systems (2022)

Best Publications

  • A survey on the security of blockchain systems

    Xiaoqi Li;Peng Jiang;Ting Chen;Xiapu Luo

  • QDASH: a QoE-aware DASH system

    Ricky K. P. Mok;Xiapu Luo;Edmond W. W. Chan;Rocky K. C. Chang

  • Under-optimized smart contracts devour your money

    Ting Chen;Xiaoqi Li;Xiapu Luo;Xiaosong Zhang

  • Understanding Ethereum via Graph Analysis

    Ting Chen;Zihao Li;Yuxiao Zhu;Jiachi Chen

  • Information processing method and device

    Xiapu Luo;Jingang Hou;Zhiwei Liu;Xianneng Zou

  • On a New Class of Pulsing Denial-of-Service Attacks and the Defense.

    Xiapu Luo;Rocky K. C. Chang

  • Android Malware Familial Classification and Representative Sample Selection via Frequent Subgraph Analysis

    Ming Fan;Jun Liu;Xiapu Luo;Kai Chen

  • Understanding Ethereum via Graph Analysis

    Ting Chen;Yuxiao Zhu;Zihao Li;Jiachi Chen

  • Inferring the QoE of HTTP video streaming from user-viewing activities

    Ricky K.P. Mok;Edmond W.W. Chan;Xiapu Luo;Rocky K.C. Chang

  • HTTPOS: Sealing Information Leaks with Browser-side Obfuscation of Encrypted Flows.

    Xiapu Luo;Peng Zhou;Edmond W. W. Chan;Wenke Lee

  • Defining Smart Contract Defects on Ethereum

    Jiachi Chen;Xin Xia;David Lo;John Grundy

  • Detecting stealthy P2P botnets using statistical traffic fingerprints

    Junjie Zhang;Roberto Perdisci;Wenke Lee;Unum Sarfraz

  • Software defect prediction based on kernel PCA and weighted extreme learning machine

    Zhou Xu;Zhou Xu;Jin Liu;Jin Liu;Xiapu Luo;Zijiang Yang

  • Model-Reuse Attacks on Deep Learning Systems

    Yujie Ji;Xinyang Zhang;Shouling Ji;Xiapu Luo

  • A detailed and real-time performance monitoring framework for blockchain systems

    Peilin Zheng;Zibin Zheng;Xiapu Luo;Xiangping Chen

  • Towards more accurate severity prediction and fixer recommendation of software bugs

    Tao Zhang;Jiachi Chen;Geunseok Yang;Byungjeong Lee

  • Flow level detection and filtering of low-rate DDoS

    Changwang Zhang;Zhiping Cai;Weifeng Chen;Xiapu Luo

  • DexHunter: Toward Extracting Hidden Code from Packed Android Applications

    Yueqian Zhang;Xiapu Luo;Haoyang Yin

  • Towards a scalable resource-driven approach for detecting repackaged Android applications

    Yuru Shao;Xiapu Luo;Chenxiong Qian;Pengfei Zhu

  • DEFECTCHECKER: Automated smart contract defect detection by analyzing EVM bytecode

    Jiachi Chen;Xin Xia;David Lo;John C. Grundy

  • Building a Scalable System for Stealthy P2P-Botnet Detection

    Junjie Zhang;Roberto Perdisci;Wenke Lee;Xiapu Luo

Frequent Co-Authors

Ting Wang
Ting Wang Washington University in St. Louis
Man Ho Au
Man Ho Au Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Wenke Lee
Wenke Lee Georgia Institute of Technology
Roberto Perdisci
Roberto Perdisci University of Georgia
Shouling Ji
Shouling Ji Zhejiang University
Kui Ren
Kui Ren Zhejiang University
Junjie Zhang
Junjie Zhang Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Guofei Gu
Guofei Gu Texas A&M University
David Lo
David Lo Singapore Management University
Xin Xia
Xin Xia Huawei Technologies (China)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can open up additional opportunities beyond traditional Computer Science programs in the USA. For those interested in hardware and systems, earning a degree from an online electrical engineering degree ranking can diversify your expertise and expand your career prospects in tech-focused industries.

If you're looking for a quicker route into the workforce, consider acquiring quick certifications that pay well. These certifications can boost your resume and lead to lucrative roles in fields such as cybersecurity, cloud computing, or project management.

Pursuing advanced education is also flexible, thanks to the quickest cheapest masters degree options now available online. These accelerated programs let you specialize in areas like data science or software engineering without a long time commitment or substantial cost.

Wondering which path provides the most value? See which master's degree is most in demand in usa to find programs aligned with market trends. Selecting the right degree or certification ensures your skills remain relevant and sought after in the evolving tech landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Xiapu Luo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles