World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
51
Citations
10741
World Ranking
5324
National Ranking
26

Martin Monperrus publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Monperrus sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 232 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Martin Monperrus D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Monperrus sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin Monperrus is affiliated with the Royal Institute of Technology in Sweden and has made contributions primarily in the field of Computer Science, with a focus on several specialized subfields including Information Systems, Software, Computer Networks and Communications, Artificial Intelligence, and Signal Processing.

Their research spans diverse topics related to software engineering and computing systems. Key topics covered in their work include:

  • Software Engineering Research
  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
  • Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

Monperrus has published extensively, with notable recent papers such as:

  • Neural program repair with execution-based backpropagation, 2022, Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering
  • Neural Transfer Learning for Repairing Security Vulnerabilities in C Code, 2022, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
  • Automated Classification of Overfitting Patches With Statically Extracted Code Features, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
  • Proof Repair Infrastructure for Supervised Models: Building a Large Proof Repair Dataset, 2023, Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • Observability and chaos engineering on system calls for containerized applications in Docker, 2021, Future Generation Computer Systems

Frequent coauthors include Benoît Baudry, Matías Martínez, André Silva, Deepika Tiwari, and Nuno Saavedra, reflecting collaborative patterns in their research activities.

Monperrus's work appears frequently in specific publication venues, indicating focal outlets for dissemination of their research. These venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
  • IEEE Software
  • IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing

Best Publications

  • Fine-grained and accurate source code differencing

    Jean-Rémy Falleri;Floréal Morandat;Xavier Blanc;Matias Martinez

  • Automatic Software Repair: A Bibliography

    Martin Monperrus

  • Learning from examples to improve code completion systems

    Marcel Bruch;Martin Monperrus;Mira Mezini

  • Nopol: Automatic Repair of Conditional Statement Bugs in Java Programs

    Jifeng Xuan;Matias Martinez;Favio DeMarco;Maxime Clement

  • SequenceR : Sequence-to-Sequence Learning for End-to-End Program Repair

    Zimin Chen;Steve Kommrusch;Michele Tufano;Louis-Noel Pouchet

  • FixMiner: Mining relevant fix patterns for automated program repair

    Anil Koyuncu;Kui Liu;Tegawendé François D Assise Bissyande;Dongsun Kim

  • Automatic repair of real bugs in java: a large-scale experiment on the defects4j dataset

    Matias Martinez;Thomas Durieux;Romain Sommerard;Jifeng Xuan

  • SPOON: A library for implementing analyses and transformations of Java source code

    Renaud Pawlak;Martin Monperrus;Martin Monperrus;Nicolas Petitprez;Carlos Noguera

  • Dexpler: converting Android Dalvik bytecode to Jimple for static analysis with Soot

    Alexandre Bartel;Jacques Klein;Yves Le Traon;Martin Monperrus

  • ASTOR: a program repair library for Java (demo)

    Matias Martinez;Martin Monperrus

  • Learning to Combine Multiple Ranking Metrics for Fault Localization

    Jifeng Xuan;Martin Monperrus

  • Mining software repair models for reasoning on the search space of automated program fixing

    Matias Martinez;Martin Monperrus

  • Dexpler: Converting Android Dalvik Bytecode to Jimple for Static Analysis with Soot

    Alexandre Bartel;Jacques Klein;Martin Monperrus;Yves Le Traon

  • A critical review of "automatic patch generation learned from human-written patches": essay on the problem statement and the evaluation of automatic software repair

    Martin Monperrus

  • Test case purification for improving fault localization

    Jifeng Xuan;Martin Monperrus

  • Automatically securing permission-based software by reducing the attack surface: an application to Android

    Alexandre Bartel;Jacques Klein;Yves Le Traon;Martin Monperrus

  • Dissection of a bug dataset: Anatomy of 395 patches from Defects4J

    Victor Sobreira;Thomas Durieux;Fernanda Madeiral;Martin Monperrus

  • BEARS: An Extensible Java Bug Benchmark for Automatic Program Repair Studies

    Fernanda Madeiral;Simon Urli;Marcelo Maia;Martin Monperrus

  • Automatic repair of buggy if conditions and missing preconditions with SMT

    Favio DeMarco;Jifeng Xuan;Daniel Le Berre;Martin Monperrus

  • Sorting and Transforming Program Repair Ingredients via Deep Learning Code Similarities

    Martin White;Michele Tufano;Matias Martinez;Martin Monperrus

  • Non-Local Manifold Tangent Learning

    Yoshua Bengio;Martin Monperrus

Frequent Co-Authors

Benoit Baudry
Benoit Baudry University of Montreal
Lionel Seinturier
Lionel Seinturier University of Lille
Mira Mezini
Mira Mezini Technical University of Darmstadt
Yves Le Traon
Yves Le Traon University of Luxembourg
Jacques Klein
Jacques Klein University of Luxembourg
Tegawendé F. Bissyandé
Tegawendé F. Bissyandé University of Luxembourg
Romain Rouvoy
Romain Rouvoy University of Lille
Jean-Marc Jézéquel
Jean-Marc Jézéquel University of Rennes
Rui Abreu
Rui Abreu University of Porto
Denys Poshyvanyk
Denys Poshyvanyk William & Mary

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in studying Computer Science in the USA, exploring related online degrees can broaden your career opportunities. Pursuing an online MBA is a popular path for those seeking leadership or management roles in tech. These programs equip graduates with business skills that complement technical expertise.

For students looking to accelerate their education, consider the 1 year online masters options. These intensive programs allow you to advance your qualifications swiftly, making it easier to pivot careers or gain promotions in the tech industry.

If return on investment is a concern, it’s worth exploring online programs that pay well. Many technology-related credentials can lead to lucrative jobs, sometimes in less time than traditional degrees.

Finally, with artificial intelligence shaping the future of tech, enrolling in the best online ai degrees can prepare you for high-demand fields involving data science, machine learning, and automation.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Monperrus

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles