World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
8242
World Ranking
11037
National Ranking
4591

Claire Le Goues publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claire Le Goues sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 169 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Claire Le Goues D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claire Le Goues sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Claire Le Goues is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States, focusing primarily on research in computer science. Their work spans multiple subfields including software, information systems, artificial intelligence, computer networks and communications, and hardware and architecture.

The main topics covered by their research include:

  • Software Engineering Research
  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques

Claire Le Goues has contributed to a variety of publications, with significant presence in several venues:

  • arXiv (Cornell University): 26 publications
  • ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology: 7 publications
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research): 6 publications
  • IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering: 3 publications
  • OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University): 3 publications

Recent notable publications include:

  • "Quality of Automated Program Repair on Real-World Defects," 2020, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
  • "Automatic Program Repair," 2021, IEEE Software
  • "VarCLR," 2022, Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering
  • "A Study on the Challenges of Using Robotics Simulators for Testing," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Mithra: Anomaly Detection as an Oracle for Cyberphysical Systems," 2021, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering

The scientist collaborates frequently with a group of coauthors, including Christopher S. Timperley, Edward J. Schwartz, Jeremy Lacomis, Bogdan Vasilescu, and Luke Dramko. Collaborative publication counts indicate sustained research partnerships with these individuals.

Best Publications

  • GenProg: A Generic Method for Automatic Software Repair

    C. Le Goues;ThanhVu Nguyen;S. Forrest;W. Weimer

  • Automatically finding patches using genetic programming

    Westley Weimer;ThanhVu Nguyen;Claire Le Goues;Stephanie Forrest

  • A systematic study of automated program repair: fixing 55 out of 105 bugs for $8 each

    Claire Le Goues;Michael Dewey-Vogt;Stephanie Forrest;Westley Weimer

  • History Driven Program Repair

    Xuan Bach D. Le;David Lo;Claire Le Goues

  • Automated program repair

    Claire Le Goues;Michael Pradel;Abhik Roychoudhury

  • Is the cure worse than the disease? overfitting in automated program repair

    Edward K. Smith;Earl T. Barr;Claire Le Goues;Yuriy Brun

  • The ManyBugs and IntroClass Benchmarks for Automated Repair of C Programs

    Claire Le Goues;Neal Holtschulte;Edward K. Smith;Yuriy Brun

  • A genetic programming approach to automated software repair

    Stephanie Forrest;ThanhVu Nguyen;Westley Weimer;Claire Le Goues

  • A systematic study of automated program repair: Fixing 55 out of 105 bugs for $8 each

    Unknown

  • Repairing Programs with Semantic Code Search (T)

    Yalin Ke;Kathryn T. Stolee;Claire Le Goues;Yuriy Brun

  • S3: syntax- and semantic-guided repair synthesis via programming by examples

    Xuan-Bach D. Le;Duc-Hiep Chu;David Lo;Claire Le Goues

  • Automatic program repair with evolutionary computation

    Westley Weimer;Stephanie Forrest;Claire Le Goues;ThanhVu Nguyen

  • A learning-to-rank based fault localization approach using likely invariants

    Tien-Duy B. Le;David Lo;Claire Le Goues;Lars Grunske

  • Current challenges in automatic software repair

    Claire Goues;Stephanie Forrest;Westley Weimer

  • Overfitting in semantics-based automated program repair

    Xuan-Bach Dinh Le;Ferdian Thung;David Lo;Claire Le Goues

  • Static automated program repair for heap properties

    Rijnard van Tonder;Claire Le Goues

  • Specification Mining with Few False Positives

    Claire Goues;Westley Weimer

  • Representations and operators for improving evolutionary software repair

    Claire Le Goues;Westley Weimer;Stephanie Forrest

  • Designing better fitness functions for automated program repair

    Ethan Fast;Claire Le Goues;Stephanie Forrest;Westley Weimer

  • DIRE: a neural approach to decompiled identifier naming

    Jeremy Lacomis;Pengcheng Yin;Edward J. Schwartz;Miltiadis Allamanis

  • A Study on Challenges of Testing Robotic Systems

    Afsoon Afzal;Claire Le Goues;Michael Hilton;Christopher Steven Timperley

  • JFIX: semantics-based repair of Java programs via symbolic PathFinder

    Xuan-Bach D. Le;Duc-Hiep Chu;David Lo;Claire Le Goues

  • [Journal First] Overfitting in Semantics-Based Automated Program Repair

    Xuan-Bach D. Le;Ferdian Thung;David Lo;Claire Le Goues

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephanie Forrest
Stephanie Forrest Arizona State University
Westley Weimer
Westley Weimer University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David Lo
David Lo Singapore Management University
Yuriy Brun
Yuriy Brun University of Massachusetts Amherst
David Garlan
David Garlan Carnegie Mellon University
Graham Neubig
Graham Neubig Carnegie Mellon University
Jonathan Aldrich
Jonathan Aldrich Carnegie Mellon University
Ferdian Thung
Ferdian Thung Singapore Management University
Philip Koopman
Philip Koopman Carnegie Mellon University
Rui Abreu
Rui Abreu University of Porto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and career opportunities. Many students explore fields that combine technology with practical applications, such as engineering, mathematics, and environmental studies.

For those interested in addressing sustainability and real-world environmental challenges, environmental engineering schools online offer affordable and flexible routes to a specialized degree. Similarly, if you want to develop solutions for machinery, manufacturing, or robotics, it’s worth exploring the mechanical engineering cost of education to find budget-friendly, accredited programs.

A strong foundation in physics can greatly enhance your computational skills. Consider available online physics degrees to deepen your scientific knowledge alongside your computer science education. Meanwhile, the rise in data-driven industries has boosted demand for specialists in analytics and machine learning—data science programs are excellent pathways for building advanced skills sought by top employers.

Exploring these related online degrees can keep your options open and prepare you for dynamic, interdisciplinary career paths in technology and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Claire Le Goues

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles