World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
9295
World Ranking
10012
National Ranking
4220

Philip Koopman publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip Koopman sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 187 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Philip Koopman D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip Koopman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Philip Koopman is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States. Their work primarily spans the fields of Engineering and Computer Science, with a focus on several subfields including Automotive Engineering, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Civil and Structural Engineering, Software, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist's research topics include Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety, Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy, Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics, Transportation Safety and Impact Analysis, Ethics and Social Impacts of AI, Human-Automation Interaction and Safety, and Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning.

Recent papers by Philip Koopman include:

  • UL 4600: What to Include in an Autonomous Vehicle Safety Case, 2023, Computer
  • Ethics, Safety, and Autonomous Vehicles, 2021, Computer
  • Safety Ethics for Design and Test of Automated Driving Features, 2023, IEEE Design and Test
  • The Awkward Middle for Automated Vehicles: Liability Attribution Rules When Humans and Computers Share Driving Responsibilities, 2023, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Lessons From the Cruise Robotaxi Pedestrian Dragging Mishap, 2024, IEEE reliability magazine

Frequent co-authors in their research are William H. Widen, Michael Wagner, Benjamin Kuipers, and Marilyn Wolf.

Philip Koopman has published mainly in the following venues:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Computer
  • IEEE Design and Test
  • IEEE reliability magazine

Regarding book publications, the scientist has contributed works with the European Organization for Nuclear Research and the Association for Computing Machinery. Titles include:

  • Better Embedded System Software (2021)
  • ACM TechBrief: Automated Vehicles (2024)

Philip Koopman was recognized as an ACM Senior Member in 2007.

Best Publications

  • Method and system for analyzing advertisements delivered to a mobile unit

    Geoffrey R. Hendrey;Hirohisa A. Tanaka;Philip J. Koopman

  • Challenges in Autonomous Vehicle Testing and Validation

    Philip Koopman;Michael Wagner

  • Autonomous Vehicle Safety: An Interdisciplinary Challenge

    Philip Koopman;Michael Wagner

  • Method and system for connecting mobile users based on degree of separation

    Geoffrey R. Hendrey;Hirohisa A. Tanaka;Philip J. Koopman;Joseph D. King

  • Method and system for selectively connecting mobile users based on physical proximity

    Geoffrey R. Hendrey;Hirohisa A. Tanaka;Philip J. Koopman

  • Cyclic redundancy code (CRC) polynomial selection for embedded networks

    P. Koopman;T. Chakravarty

  • Method and system for connecting proximately located mobile users based on compatible attributes

    Hirohisa A. Tanaka;Geoffrey R. Hendrey;Philip J. Koopman;Joseph D. King

  • Automated robustness testing of off-the-shelf software components

    N.P. Kropp;P.J. Koopman;D.P. Siewiorek

  • 32-bit cyclic redundancy codes for Internet applications

    P. Koopman

  • Comparing the robustness of POSIX operating systems

    P. Koopman;J. DeVale

  • Comparing operating systems using robustness benchmarks

    P. Koopman;J. Sung;C. Dingman;D. Siewiorek

  • Work-arounds, make-work, and kludges

    P. Koopman;R.R. Hoffman

  • Embedded system security

    P. Koopman

  • The exception handling effectiveness of POSIX operating systems

    P. Koopman;J. DeVale

  • Embedded system design issues (the rest of the story)

    P. Koopman

  • Semantic anomaly detection in online data sources

    Orna Raz;Philip Koopman;Mary Shaw

  • Toward a Framework for Highly Automated Vehicle Safety Validation

    Philip Koopman;Michael Wagner

  • Undergraduate embedded system education at Carnegie Mellon

    Philip Koopman;Howie Choset;Rajeev Gandhi;Bruce Krogh

  • Elements of the Self-Healing System Problem Space

    Philip Koopman

  • The Effectiveness of Checksums for Embedded Control Networks

    T.C. Maxino;P.J. Koopman

  • How Many Operational Design Domains, Objects, and Events?

    Philip Koopman;Frank Fratrik

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel P. Siewiorek
Daniel P. Siewiorek Carnegie Mellon University
Mary Shaw
Mary Shaw Carnegie Mellon University
Henrique Madeira
Henrique Madeira University of Coimbra
Peter Lee
Peter Lee Carnegie Mellon University
Christos Faloutsos
Christos Faloutsos Carnegie Mellon University
Priya Narasimhan
Priya Narasimhan Carnegie Mellon University
Claire Le Goues
Claire Le Goues Carnegie Mellon University
Diana Marculescu
Diana Marculescu The University of Texas at Austin
Bruce H. Krogh
Bruce H. Krogh Carnegie Mellon University
Howie Choset
Howie Choset Carnegie Mellon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you consider studying Computer Science in the USA, it’s worth exploring related fields and career pathways that can broaden your expertise and boost your employability. A variety of affordable, flexible online options are available in high-demand STEM areas.

For those interested in a strong scientific foundation, a bachelor of science in physics online provides a thorough understanding of key scientific principles and analytical skills. If data interests you, you may want to find what is the cheapest data science course in the us? to start a career in big data, analytics, or AI.

Engineering-minded students can benefit from exploring online electrical engineering courses USA—a field that overlaps with hardware, energy, and robotics industries. If you want quicker, skill-focused credentials, consider 3-month certificate programs that pay well and can provide fast access to lucrative jobs in IT, cybersecurity, and tech support.

Exploring these pathways can help you build a versatile and rewarding tech career, whether you're aiming for a traditional degree or a more specialized, fast-track certification.

Best Scientists Citing Philip Koopman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles