World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 48 6249 6069 2795 2694 101 7675

Mark Carlson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark Carlson between 2007 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark Carlson published across 14 years, from 2007 to 2020, averaging 11.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2009. 5 of the 159 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2009. 2007: 12 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 25 publications 2010: 25 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 1 publication
2007 2020

159 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark Carlson: publications per year, 2007 to 2020
Year Publications
2007 12
2008 15
2009 25
2010 25
2011 13
2012 17
2013 23
2014 3
2015 5
2016 11
2017 2
2018 3
2019 4
2020 1
Total 159
Download as CSV

Mark Carlson publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Carlson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 92–101 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 101 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421 101
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark Carlson D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Carlson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543 48
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Operating system
  • Computer network
  • Database

His primary scientific interests are in Computer security, Database transaction, Payment, Identifier and Database. His work carried out in the field of Computer security brings together such families of science as Payment processor, Merchant account, Credit card, Mobile payment and Payment transaction. His Database transaction study incorporates themes from Alias, World Wide Web and Internet privacy.

The various areas that Mark Carlson examines in his Payment study include Receipt and Authorization. His research investigates the connection between Identifier and topics such as Payment service provider that intersect with problems in Payment card, MULTOS and Card security code. Particularly relevant to Transaction processing is his body of work in Database.

His most cited work include:

  • Snap mobile payment apparatuses, methods and systems (321 citations)
  • Secure mobile payment system (186 citations)
  • Systems and methods for secure and transparent cardless transactions (184 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Mark Carlson mostly deals with Database transaction, Computer security, Payment, Database and World Wide Web. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Receipt, Computer network and Mobile device. His study in the field of Server, Protocol and Gateway also crosses realms of Set.

His Computer security study incorporates themes from Payment processor, Identifier, Credit card and Internet privacy. His Payment service provider, Payment system and Merchant account study in the realm of Payment interacts with subjects such as Location. His work carried out in the field of World Wide Web brings together such families of science as Event, User interface, Data warehouse and Human–computer interaction.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Database transaction (45.61%)
  • Computer security (38.60%)
  • Payment (21.05%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2013-2019)?

  • Computer network (18.42%)
  • Database (20.18%)
  • Database transaction (45.61%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of investigation include Computer network, Database, Database transaction, Mobile device and World Wide Web. His Computer network research includes themes of Embedded system, Chip and Code. His Database study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Tokenization, Security token and Authorization.

His study in Database transaction is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Computer security and Mobile phone. His Mobile device research includes elements of Real-time computing and Server. His World Wide Web research incorporates elements of Event and Location-based service.

Between 2013 and 2019, his most popular works were:

  • Tokenization and third-party interaction (78 citations)
  • Access using a mobile device with an accelerometer (38 citations)
  • Systems and methods to select locations of interest based on distance from route points or route paths (23 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Operating system
  • Computer network
  • Database

Mark Carlson mainly investigates Computer network, Location-based service, Selection, World Wide Web and Third party. Mark Carlson has researched Computer network in several fields, including Point of sale, Embedded system and Accelerometer. Other disciplines of study, such as Issuer, Tokenization, Authorization, Database transaction and Computer security, are mixed together with his Third party studies.

His research integrates issues of Security token and Database in his study of Issuer.

Best Publications

  • Snap mobile payment apparatuses, methods and systems

    Uzma Makhdumi;Ayman Hammad;Igor Karpenko;Miroslav Gavrilov

  • Secure mobile payment system

    Mark Carlson

  • Transaction authentication using network

    Ayman Hammad;Patrick Faith;Mark Carlson

  • Access using a mobile device with an accelerometer

    Patrick Faith;Mark Carlson;Ayman Hammad;Ben Rewis

  • Systems and methods for secure and transparent cardless transactions

    Mark Carlson;Surendra Keshan;Patrick Faith

  • Terminal Data Encryption

    Ayman Hammad;Patrick Faith

  • Electronic offer optimization and redemption apparatuses, methods and systems

    Prakash Hariramani;Mark Carlson

  • Systems and methods to secure user identification

    Mark Carlson;Michael Steven Bankston;Kalpana Jogi;Timothy Gallagher

  • Securing external systems with account token substitution

    Gourab Basu;Michael Mori;Ross Sakata;Steve Cracknell

  • Systems and methods for multi-channel offer redemption

    John Hamilton Macilwaine;Patrick Stan;Kirsten E. Garen;Mark Carlson

  • Customer mapping using mobile device with an accelerometer

    Patrick Faith;Mark Carlson;Ayman Hammad

  • Customized payment transaction notification

    Mark Carlson;Patrick Stan;Patrick Faith

  • Communication device including multi-part alias identifier

    Mark Carlson

  • Device pairing via trusted intermediary

    Mark Carlson

  • Systems and methods for geographic location notifications of payment transactions

    Mark Carlson;Patrick Faith

  • Multi-alerts based system

    Ayman Hammad;Mark Carlson

  • Anti-phishing system and method including list with user data

    Mark Carlson;Patrick Faith

  • Systems and methods to redeem offers based on a predetermined geographic region

    Mark Carlson;Patrick Stan

  • Alias reputation interaction system

    Mark Carlson;Patrick Stan;Patrick Faith;Benjamin Rewis

  • Systems and methods to provide offer communications to users via social networking sites

    Ayman Hammad;Matthew Joy;Joseph Spears;Mark Carlson

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick Faith
Patrick Faith Visa (United Kingdom)
Ayman Hammad
Ayman Hammad Visa (United Kingdom)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Computer Science degree opens up numerous flexible study options and career possibilities. Many students explore computer science degree online programs for greater convenience and accelerated learning opportunities. These programs make it easier to balance study with work or personal commitments.

If you are concerned about academic requirements, consider universities for low gpa. These universities can be more accessible and offer supportive environments for students who may not have had perfect academic records but still want a quality online education.

Computer science skills can also complement degrees outside traditional tech fields. For example, a environmental science degree can lead to careers in sustainability, analysis, or environmental policy. Those interested in engineering applications may pursue a environmental engineering online degree, combining technical expertise with environmental solutions.

Exploring these related degrees and pathways online can empower you to match your education to your evolving interests and the demands of today’s job market.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Carlson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles