World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
91
Citations
31422
World Ranking
11728
National Ranking
363

Emile Daraï publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emile Daraï sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 824 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Emile Daraï D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emile Daraï sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Emile Daraï is affiliated with Sorbonne University in France and has a research focus primarily in the field of Medicine, with significant contributions to subfields including Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, Oncology, Surgery, and Cancer Research.

Their work spans various topics related to women's health and cancer treatments, such as:

  • Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
  • Uterine Myomas and Treatments
  • Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
  • Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Gynecological conditions and treatments

Emile Daraï has published extensively in several journals, with frequent publications in:

  • Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction
  • European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertilité & Sénologie
  • Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

Among recent research papers, notable works include:

  • Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging (O-RADS MRI) Score for Risk Stratification of Sonographically Indeterminate Adnexal Masses, 2020, JAMA Network Open
  • Sentinel lymph node biopsy and morbidity outcomes in early cervical cancer: Results of a multicentre randomised trial (SENTICOL-2), 2021, European Journal of Cancer
  • Salivary MicroRNA Signature for Diagnosis of Endometriosis, 2022, Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Surgical Outcomes after Colorectal Surgery for Endometriosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, 2020, Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
  • Lymphovascular invasion has a significant prognostic impact in patients with early breast cancer, results from a large, national, multicenter, retrospective cohort study, 2021, ESMO Open

Their work features collaboration with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Sofiane Bendifallah
  • Cyril Touboul
  • Yohann Dabi
  • Kamila Kolańska
  • Clément Ferrier

Best Publications

  • Deep pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging for diagnosis and prediction of extension of disease.

    Marc Bazot;Emile Darai;Roula Hourani;Isabelle Thomassin

  • Detection rate and diagnostic accuracy of sentinel-node biopsy in early stage endometrial cancer: a prospective multicentre study (SENTI-ENDO)

    Marcos Ballester;Gil Dubernard;Fabrice Lécuru;Denis Heitz

  • Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology

    Marc Bazot;Annie Cortez;Emile Darai;Jérome Rouger

  • Diagnostic accuracy of physical examination, transvaginal sonography, rectal endoscopic sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose deep infiltrating endometriosis.

    Marc Bazot;Clarisse Lafont;Roman Rouzier;Gilles Roseau

  • Bilateral Negative Sentinel Nodes Accurately Predict Absence of Lymph Node Metastasis in Early Cervical Cancer: Results of the SENTICOL Study

    Fabrice Lécuru;Patrice Mathevet;Denis Querleu;Eric Leblanc

  • Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography for deep pelvic endometriosis

    M. Bazot;I. Thomassin;R. Hourani;A. Cortez

  • Feasibility and clinical outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection for endometriosis

    Emile Darai;Isabelle Thomassin;Emmanuel Barranger;Romain Detchev

  • An axilla scoring system to predict non-sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node involvement.

    Emmanuel Barranger;Charles Coutant;Antoine Flahault;Yann Delpech

  • Are sphincter defects the cause of anal incontinence after vaginal delivery? Results of a prospective study.

    Laurent Abramowitz;Iradj Sobhani;Roland Ganansia;Albert Vuagnat

  • Comparison of Models to Predict Nonsentinel Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer Patients With Metastatic Sentinel Lymph Nodes: A Prospective Multicenter Study

    Charles Coutant;Camille Olivier;Eric Lambaudie;Eric Fondrinier

  • Randomized trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open colorectal resection for endometriosis: morbidity, symptoms, quality of life, and fertility.

    Emile Daraï;Gil Dubernard;Charles Coutant;Catherine Frey

  • Role of transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis

    Marc Bazot;Emile Daraï

  • Pregnancy outcomes after treatment for fibromyomata: uterine artery embolization versus laparoscopic myomectomy ☆

    Jay Goldberg;Leonardo Pereira;Vincenzo Berghella;James Diamond

  • Accuracy of transvaginal sonography and rectal endoscopic sonography in the diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis

    M. Bazot;P. Malzy;A. Cortez;G. Roseau

  • Borderline ovarian tumour: pathological diagnostic dilemma and risk factors for invasive or lethal recurrence

    Philippe Morice;Philippe Morice;Catherine Uzan;Raffaele Fauvet;Sebastien Gouy

  • Characterization of Complex Adnexal Masses: Value of Adding Perfusion- and Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging to Conventional MR Imaging

    Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara;Irwin Toussaint;Nicolas Perrot;Roman Rouzier

  • Transvaginal sonography and rectal endoscopic sonography for the assessment of pelvic endometriosis: a preliminary comparison

    Marc Bazot;Romain Detchev;Annie Cortez;Paul Amouyal

  • Epithelial Ovarian Tumors: Value of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging and Correlation with Tumor Angiogenesis

    Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara;Marc Bazot;Emile Daraï;Patrice Callard

  • Laparoscopic management of borderline ovarian tumors: results of a French multicenter study

    R. Fauvet;J. Boccara;C. Dufournet;C. Poncelet

  • Contribution of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for predicting benignity of complex adnexal masses

    Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara;Emile Daraï;Charles A. Cuenod;Laure Fournier

Frequent Co-Authors

Roman Rouzier
Roman Rouzier The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Philippe Morice
Philippe Morice Institut Gustave Roussy
Hervé Fernandez
Hervé Fernandez Grenoble Alpes University
Pierre Duvillard
Pierre Duvillard Institut Gustave Roussy
Jean-Yves Scoazec
Jean-Yves Scoazec Grenoble Alpes University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to diverse online degree options and career routes beyond the traditional MD path. For those interested in healthcare leadership, there are a number of cheapest online mha programs that provide flexibility and affordability for future healthcare administrators.

Nursing professionals looking to advance may consider the best online bsn to dnp programs, which allow registered nurses to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree fully online. Similarly, for those pursuing a pharmaceutical career, online pharmacy school programs deliver doctorate-level education with the convenience of remote study.

Health information and data management are rising fields in medicine. Completing rhia certification programs online gives graduates the expertise needed to manage sensitive health data securely and efficiently.

Each of these online pathways can lead to rewarding healthcare roles, giving students flexibility and a wide array of specializations as they shape their future careers.

Best Scientists Citing Emile Daraï

Trending Scientists