World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
101
Citations
39539
World Ranking
7949
National Ranking
4134

Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 876 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 101 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum is affiliated with Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in the United States. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Medicine, with a focus on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, Epidemiology, Surgery, and Cancer Research.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, including:

  • Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
  • Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
  • Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Uterine Myomas and Treatments
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Genetic factors in colorectal cancer

Their publication record includes contributions to leading journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Modern Pathology, and Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Notable recent papers authored by Abu-Rustum include:

  • "Uterine Neoplasms, Version 1.2023, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology" (2023, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network)
  • "NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Cervical Cancer, Version 1.2024" (2023, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network)
  • "NCCN Guidelines Insights: Cervical Cancer, Version 1.2020" (2020, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network)

Additional influential papers connected to the broader field include "Sensitive and specific multi-cancer detection and localization using methylation signatures in cell-free DNA" (2020, Annals of Oncology), and "Genomic characterization of metastatic patterns from prospective clinical sequencing of 25,000 patients" (2022, Cell), though these list other authors primarily.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Abu-Rustum are:

  • Mario M. Leitão
  • Britta Weigelt
  • Jennifer J. Mueller
  • Kara Long Roche
  • Carol Aghajanian

Best Publications

  • Sensitive and specific multi-cancer detection and localization using methylation signatures in cell-free DNA

    M C Liu;G R Oxnard;E A Klein;C Swanton

  • Cervical Cancer, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

    Wui Jin Koh;Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum;Sarah Bean;Kristin Bradley

  • What is the optimal goal of primary cytoreductive surgery for bulky stage IIIC epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC)

    D. S. Chi;E. L. Eisenhauer;J. Lang;J. Huh

  • Improved progression-free and overall survival in advanced ovarian cancer as a result of a change in surgical paradigm

    Dennis S. Chi;Eric L. Eisenhauer;Oliver Zivanovic;Yukio Sonoda

  • Uterine Neoplasms, Version 1.2018: Clinical practice guidelines in oncology

    Wui Jin Koh;Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum;Sarah Bean;Kristin Bradley

  • The importance of applying a sentinel lymph node mapping algorithm in endometrial cancer staging: Beyond removal of blue nodes

    Joyce N. Barlin;Fady Khoury-Collado;Christine H. Kim;Mario M. Leitao

  • The incidence of symptomatic lower-extremity lymphedema following treatment of uterine corpus malignancies: a 12-year experience at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.

    Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum;Kaled Alektiar;Alexia Iasonos;Gali Lev

  • Guidelines and selection criteria for secondary cytoreductive surgery in patients with recurrent, platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

    Dennis S. Chi;Kristina McCaughty;John P. Diaz;Jae Huh

  • The addition of extensive upper abdominal surgery to achieve optimal cytoreduction improves survival in patients with stages IIIC-IV epithelial ovarian cancer.

    Eric L. Eisenhauer;Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum;Yukio Sonoda;Douglas A. Levine

  • Sentinel lymph node mapping and staging in endometrial cancer: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology literature review with consensus recommendations

    Robert W. Holloway;Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum;Floor J. Backes;John F. Boggess

  • Improved optimal cytoreduction rates for stages IIIC and IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer: a change in surgical approach.

    Dennis S. Chi;Corinna C. Franklin;Douglas A. Levine;Faina Akselrod

  • Cervical cancer, version 2.2015: Featured updates to the NCCN guidelines featured updates to the NCCN guidelines

    Wui Jin Koh;Benjamin E. Greer;Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum;Sachin M. Apte

  • An analysis of patients with bulky advanced stage ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal carcinoma treated with primary debulking surgery (PDS) during an identical time period as the randomized EORTC-NCIC trial of PDS vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

    Dennis S. Chi;Fernanda Musa;Fanny Dao;Oliver Zivanovic

  • Detection of sentinel lymph nodes in minimally invasive surgery using indocyanine green and near-infrared fluorescence imaging for uterine and cervical malignancies

    Elizabeth L. Jewell;Elizabeth L. Jewell;Juan Juan Huang;Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum;Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum;Ginger J. Gardner;Ginger J. Gardner

  • Near-infrared fluorescence for detection of sentinel lymph nodes in women with cervical and uterine cancers (FILM): a randomised, phase 3, multicentre, non-inferiority trial

    Michael Frumovitz;Marie Plante;Paula S Lee;Samith Sandadi

  • Molecular Classification of Grade 3 Endometrioid Endometrial Cancers Identifies Distinct Prognostic Subgroups.

    Tjalling Bosse;Remi A Nout;Jessica N McAlpine;Melissa K McConechy

  • Pathologic Ultrastaging Improves Micrometastasis Detection in Sentinel Lymph Nodes during Endometrial Cancer Staging

    Christine H. Kim;Robert A. Soslow;Kay J. Park;Emma L. Barber

  • Sentinel lymph node mapping for grade 1 endometrial cancer: Is it the answer to the surgical staging dilemma?

    Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum;Fady Khoury-Collado;Neeta Pandit-Taskar;Robert A. Soslow

  • Gynecologic cancer treatment and the impact of cancer-related infertility

    Jeanne Carter;Katherine Rowland;Dennis Chi;Carol Brown

  • Genomic characterization of metastatic patterns from prospective clinical sequencing of 25,000 patients

    Bastien Nguyen;Christopher Fong;Anisha Luthra;Shaleigh A. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Dennis S. Chi
Dennis S. Chi Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Yukio Sonoda
Yukio Sonoda Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Richard R. Barakat
Richard R. Barakat Northwell Health
Robert A. Soslow
Robert A. Soslow Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Carol Aghajanian
Carol Aghajanian Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Douglas A. Levine
Douglas A. Levine New York University
Jorge S. Reis-Filho
Jorge S. Reis-Filho Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Hedvig Hricak
Hedvig Hricak Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Pedro Tomas Ramirez
Pedro Tomas Ramirez The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Amy L. Weaver
Amy L. Weaver Mayo Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in healthcare, there are flexible and affordable online pathways to advance your education and career. Many nursing professionals start by pursuing a Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) for expanded roles and higher salaries. Today, you can find some of the cheapest rn to bsn online programs, making further education within reach for working nurses.

If you hold a non-nursing bachelor’s degree but wish to become a nurse, consider exploring online direct entry msn programs. These intensive options offer a fast track to a nursing career without requiring prior nursing experience.

For those seeking advanced roles in research, education, or leadership, the cheapest phd nursing programs provide a cost-effective route to a top qualification. Admission requirements can vary widely between institutions. Some schools are known as direct admit nursing programs, catering to applicants looking for more accessible entry points.

Exploring these online degrees and career pathways can open doors to numerous opportunities in the U.S. healthcare system.

Best Scientists Citing Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles