World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Richard R. Barakat

Richard R. Barakat

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
106
Citations
39157
World Ranking
6568
National Ranking
3489

Richard R. Barakat publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard R. Barakat sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 532 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Richard R. Barakat D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard R. Barakat sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 106 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard R. Barakat is affiliated with Northwell Health in the United States and specializes in the field of dentistry, with particular emphasis on oral surgery, orthodontics, and medical laboratory technology. Their research portfolio consists of a substantial number of publications, primarily focused on endodontics and root canal treatments.

Their recent published works include studies on diverse topics within dental research: Ergonomics of preclinical dental students and potential musculoskeletal disorders (2020, Journal of Dental Education), Assessment of dens invaginatus and its characteristics in maxillary anterior teeth using cone-beam computed tomography (2021, Scientific Reports), Effect of Autoclaving Cycles on the Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Race and Race Evo Nickel-Titanium Endodontic Rotary Files: An In Vitro Study (2021, Metals), Influence of Preclinical Training on Root Canal Treatment Technical Quality and Confidence Level of Undergraduate Dental Students (2021, International Journal of Dentistry), and Effect of dental trauma management resources on dental practitioners' confidence and knowledge: A pilot cross-sectional study (2022, Dental Traumatology).

Their coauthors frequently include Reem M. Barakat, Fahda N. Algahtani, Manal Alkadi, Manal Matoug-Elwerfelli, and Hanan Balto.

The most common venues for their publications are:

  • Scientific Reports
  • Saudi Endodontic Journal
  • PeerJ
  • Scanning
  • PLoS ONE

Richard R. Barakat's research spans multiple subfields of dentistry, predominantly:

  • Oral Surgery
  • Orthodontics
  • Medical Laboratory Technology
  • General Dentistry
  • General Health Professions

The main topics explored in their work cover:

  • Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
  • Dental Radiography and Imaging
  • Dental materials and restorations
  • Occupational health in dentistry
  • Dental Research and COVID-19
  • Dental Trauma and Treatments
  • Oral microbiology and periodontitis research

Best Publications

  • Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.

    Noah D. Kauff;Jaya M. Satagopan;Mark E. Robson;Lauren Scheuer

  • Laparoscopy Compared With Laparotomy for Comprehensive Surgical Staging of Uterine Cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2

    Joan L. Walker;Marion R. Piedmonte;Nick M. Spirtos;Scott M. Eisenkop

  • What is the optimal goal of primary cytoreductive surgery for bulky stage IIIC epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC)

    D. S. Chi;E. L. Eisenhauer;J. Lang;J. Huh

  • Gemcitabine and Docetaxel in Patients With Unresectable Leiomyosarcoma: Results of a Phase II Trial

    Martee L. Hensley;Robert Maki;E. Venkatraman;Gennifer Geller

  • Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy for the Prevention of BRCA1- and BRCA2-Associated Breast and Gynecologic Cancer: A Multicenter, Prospective Study

    Noah D. Kauff;Susan M. Domchek;Tara M. Friebel;Mark E. Robson

  • Improved progression-free and overall survival in advanced ovarian cancer as a result of a change in surgical paradigm

    Dennis S. Chi;Eric L. Eisenhauer;Oliver Zivanovic;Yukio Sonoda

  • Clinicopathologic Features of BRCA-Linked and Sporadic Ovarian Cancer

    Jeff Boyd;Yukio Sonoda;Mark G. Federici;Faina Bogomolniy

  • Recurrence and Survival After Random Assignment to Laparoscopy Versus Laparotomy for Comprehensive Surgical Staging of Uterine Cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2 Study

    Joan L. Walker;Marion R. Piedmonte;Nick M. Spirtos;Scott M. Eisenkop

  • Frequent Mutation of the PIK3CA Gene in Ovarian and Breast Cancers

    Douglas A. Levine;Faina Bogomolniy;Cindy J. Yee;Alex Lash

  • Outcome of Preventive Surgery and Screening for Breast and Ovarian Cancer in BRCA Mutation Carriers

    Lauren Scheuer;Noah Kauff;Mark Robson;Bridget Kelly

  • The importance of applying a sentinel lymph node mapping algorithm in endometrial cancer staging: Beyond removal of blue nodes

    Joyce N. Barlin;Fady Khoury-Collado;Christine H. Kim;Mario M. Leitao

  • The incidence of symptomatic lower-extremity lymphedema following treatment of uterine corpus malignancies: a 12-year experience at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.

    Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum;Kaled Alektiar;Alexia Iasonos;Gali Lev

  • Guidelines and selection criteria for secondary cytoreductive surgery in patients with recurrent, platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

    Dennis S. Chi;Kristina McCaughty;John P. Diaz;Jae Huh

  • The addition of extensive upper abdominal surgery to achieve optimal cytoreduction improves survival in patients with stages IIIC-IV epithelial ovarian cancer.

    Eric L. Eisenhauer;Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum;Yukio Sonoda;Douglas A. Levine

  • Phase I trial of intraperitoneal taxol: a Gynecoloic Oncology Group study.

    M Markman;E Rowinsky;T Hakes;B Reichman

  • Improved optimal cytoreduction rates for stages IIIC and IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer: a change in surgical approach.

    Dennis S. Chi;Corinna C. Franklin;Douglas A. Levine;Faina Akselrod

  • An analysis of patients with bulky advanced stage ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal carcinoma treated with primary debulking surgery (PDS) during an identical time period as the randomized EORTC-NCIC trial of PDS vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

    Dennis S. Chi;Fernanda Musa;Fanny Dao;Oliver Zivanovic

  • Detection of sentinel lymph nodes in minimally invasive surgery using indocyanine green and near-infrared fluorescence imaging for uterine and cervical malignancies

    Elizabeth L. Jewell;Elizabeth L. Jewell;Juan Juan Huang;Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum;Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum;Ginger J. Gardner;Ginger J. Gardner

  • Stage IV Ovarian Cancer: Impact of Surgical Debulking1

    John P. Curtin;Rizwan Malik;Ennapadam S. Venkatraman;Richard R. Barakat

  • Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: clinical outcomes and hospital charges.

    M.L. Gemignani;J.P. Curtin;J. Zelmanovich;D.A. Patel

Frequent Co-Authors

Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum
Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Dennis S. Chi
Dennis S. Chi Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Yukio Sonoda
Yukio Sonoda Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Robert A. Soslow
Robert A. Soslow Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Douglas A. Levine
Douglas A. Levine New York University
William J. Hoskins
William J. Hoskins Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Carol Aghajanian
Carol Aghajanian Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Stephen C. Rubin
Stephen C. Rubin University of Pennsylvania
Kenneth Offit
Kenneth Offit Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Maurie Markman
Maurie Markman The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in medicine opens doors to a range of rewarding roles beyond medical school. Many students explore online degrees, which offer flexibility and targeted paths into key healthcare positions.

For those looking to enter nursing quickly, an LPN fast track program is a great starting point. These accelerated courses help you begin your nursing career sooner, with the convenience of online study.

If you’re interested in advanced mental health care, the shortest post master's pmhnp online programs can prepare practicing nurses for specialized psychiatric roles in a relatively short timeframe.

For future leaders in healthcare organizations, affordable online options are becoming steadily more available. Consider an affordable healthcare administration degree online, which can open doors to management and administrative roles across care settings.

Those aiming for senior leadership might prefer the cheapest mha programs. These advanced degrees prepare graduates for high-level positions while offering cost-effective tuition.

With these online pathways, you can tailor your education to suit your interests, timeline, and budget—all while preparing for in-demand health careers.

Best Scientists Citing Richard R. Barakat

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles