World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
62
Citations
10916
World Ranking
3583
National Ranking
1653

Michael J. O'Neill publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. O'Neill sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 188 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Michael J. O'Neill D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. O'Neill sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Impaired glymphatic function and clearance of tau in an Alzheimer's disease model.

    Ian F. Harrison;Ozama Ismail;Asif Machhada;Niall Colgan;Niall Colgan

  • A novel in vivo model of tau propagation with rapid and progressive neurofibrillary tangle pathology: the pattern of spread is determined by connectivity, not proximity

    Zeshan Ahmed;Jane Cooper;Tracey K. Murray;Katya Garn

  • 6-Hydroxydopamine-induced Apoptosis Is Mediated via Extracellular Auto-oxidation and Caspase 3-dependent Activation of Protein Kinase Cδ

    Katharine Hanrott;Louise Gudmunsen;Michael J. O’Neill;Susan Wonnacott

  • Fluoxetine-induced change in rat brain expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor varies depending on length of treatment.

    G. de Foubert;S.L. Carney;C.S. Robinson;E.J. Destexhe

  • The role of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in acute and chronic neurodegeneration.

    M J O'Neill;T K Murray;V Lakics;N P Visanji

  • AMPA Receptor Potentiators for the Treatment of CNS Disorders

    Michael J O'Neill;David Bleakman;Dennis M Zimmerman;Eric S Nisenbaum

  • Conformation Determines the Seeding Potencies of Native and Recombinant Tau Aggregates

    Benjamin Falcon;Annalisa Cavallini;Rachel Angers;Sarah Glover

  • Application of neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) to a tau pathology model of Alzheimer's disease

    Niall Colgan;Niall Colgan;Bernard Siow;James M. O'Callaghan;Ian F. Harrison

  • The IMPROVE Guidelines (Ischaemia Models: Procedural Refinements Of in Vivo Experiments):

    Nathalie Percie du Sert;Alessio Alfieri;Stuard M. Allan;Hilary V. O. Carswell

  • Neuroprotective activity of the potent and selective mGlu1a metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonist, (+)-2-methyl-4 carboxyphenylglycine (LY367385): comparison with LY357366, a broader spectrum antagonist with equal affinity for mGlu1a and mGlu5 receptors.

    V Bruno;G Battaglia;A Kingston;M.J O’Neill

  • Antagonists of GLU K5 -containing kainate receptors prevent pilocarpine-induced limbic seizures

    Ilse Smolders;Zuner A. Bortolotto;Vernon R. J. Clarke;Ruth Warre

  • LY503430, a Novel α-Amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic Acid Receptor Potentiator with Functional, Neuroprotective and Neurotrophic Effects in Rodent Models of Parkinson's Disease

    Tracey K. Murray;Katherine Whalley;Christine S. Robinson;Mark A. Ward

  • An AMPA receptor potentiator modulates hippocampal expression of BDNF: an in vivo study

    Marzena Mackowiak;Michael J O’Neill;Caroline A Hicks;David Bleakman

  • Short Fibrils Constitute the Major Species of Seed-Competent Tau in the Brains of Mice Transgenic for Human P301S Tau.

    Samuel J. Jackson;Caroline Kerridge;Jane Cooper;Annalisa Cavallini

  • Glucocerebrosidase 1 deficient Danio rerio mirror key pathological aspects of human Gaucher disease and provide evidence of early microglial activation preceding alpha-synuclein-independent neuronal cell death

    Marcus Keatinge;Hai Bui;Aswin Menke;Yu-Chia Chen

  • Loss of MicroRNA-7 Regulation Leads to α-Synuclein Accumulation and Dopaminergic Neuronal Loss In Vivo.

    Kirsty J McMillan;Tracey K Murray;Nora Bengoa-Vergniory;Oscar Cordero-Llana

  • Decahydroisoquinolines: novel competitive AMPA/kainate antagonists with neuroprotective effects in global cerebral ischaemia.

    Michael J O'Neill;Ann Bond;Paul L Ornstein;Mark A Ward

  • The adenosine A2A antagonist KF17837 reverses the locomotor suppression and tremulous jaw movements induced by haloperidol in rats: possible relevance to parkinsonism.

    M Correa;A Wisniecki;A Betz;D.R Dobson

  • Mapping the central effects of ketamine in the rat using pharmacological MRI

    Clare L. Littlewood;Nicholas Jones;Michael J. O’Neill;Stephen N. Mitchell

  • Upregulation of calpain activity precedes tau phosphorylation and loss of synaptic proteins in Alzheimer's disease brain

    Ksenia Kurbatskaya;Emma Claire Phillips;Cara Louise Croft;Giacomo Dentoni

  • Evaluation of the mGluR2/3 agonist LY379268 in rodent models of Parkinson's disease.

    Tracey K Murray;Marcus J Messenger;Mark A Ward;Sandra Woodhouse

Frequent Co-Authors

David Lodge
David Lodge University of Bristol
Mark D. Tricklebank
Mark D. Tricklebank Eli Lilly (United States)
David A. Collier
David A. Collier Eli Lilly (United States)
Elizabeth M. C. Fisher
Elizabeth M. C. Fisher University College London
Sebastien Ourselin
Sebastien Ourselin King's College London
Mike Hutton
Mike Hutton Eli Lilly (United States)
Stephen Newhouse
Stephen Newhouse King's College London
David M. Lodge
David M. Lodge Cornell University
Marc Modat
Marc Modat King's College London
Andrew D. Randall
Andrew D. Randall University of Exeter

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Thinking about expanding your studies beyond neuroscience? There are several related online degrees that offer flexible pathways into rewarding careers. For those interested in the brain and human behavior, an accredited online psychology degree is a popular, cost-effective option. This program can provide a strong foundation for roles in counseling, research, or mental health services.

If you want to make an impact in social work, consider a 1 year online master's in social work. Shorter programs can help you quickly earn credentials and start working to support families and communities.

For those aiming for clinical practice or high-level expertise, there are accredited online psyd programs apa accredited. These doctoral programs lead to advanced clinical psychology roles.

Interested in relationships and therapy? A mft program prepares you to help couples and families improve their lives. Each pathway offers a unique way to build a career connected to neuroscience and mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Michael J. O'Neill

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles