World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mercè Correa

Mercè Correa

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
60
Citations
13490
World Ranking
3830
National Ranking
52

Mercè Correa publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mercè Correa sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 163 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Mercè Correa D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mercè Correa sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mercè Correa is affiliated with Jaume I University in Spain and specializes in neuroscience with a significant focus on cellular and molecular neuroscience, behavioral neuroscience, and cognitive neuroscience. Their body of research includes 49 publications broadly categorized under neuroscience, with notable subfields spanning cellular and molecular neuroscience (26 publications), behavioral neuroscience (12 publications), cognitive neuroscience (6 publications), social psychology (6 publications), and molecular biology (4 publications).

Their research extensively covers topics related to neurotransmitter receptor influence on behavior, stress responses and cortisol, neuroendocrine regulation and behavior, and neural and behavioral psychology studies. These topics reflect the core of their scientific exploration: understanding receptor mechanisms, signaling pathways, and the neuropharmacological underpinnings of behavior and physiological responses.

Mercè Correa has contributed to key publication venues throughout their career, with a substantial number of papers appearing in Psychopharmacology (9 publications), Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (4 publications), Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience (3 publications), Neuropharmacology (3 publications), and Àgora de salut (2 publications).

Their recent published papers demonstrate ongoing engagement with motivation, dopamine function, and exercise models in behavioral pharmacology:

  • "The Neurobiology of Activational Aspects of Motivation: Exertion of Effort, Effort-Based Decision Making, and the Role of Dopamine" (2023) in Annual Review of Psychology
  • "Behavioral and dopamine transporter binding properties of the modafinil analog (S, S)-CE-158: reversal of the motivational effects of tetrabenazine and enhancement of progressive ratio responding" (2020) in Psychopharmacology
  • "Complexities and paradoxes in understanding the role of dopamine in incentive motivation and instrumental action: Exertion of effort vs. anhedonia" (2022) in Brain Research Bulletin
  • "Preference for Exercise vs. More Sedentary Reinforcers: Validation of an Animal Model of Tetrabenazine-Induced Anergia" (2020) in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
  • "Preference for vigorous exercise versus sedentary sucrose drinking: an animal model of anergia induced by dopamine receptor antagonism" (2020) in Behavioural Pharmacology

Frequent coauthors in Mercè Correa's work include:

  • John D. Salamone
  • Renee A. Rotolo
  • Rose E. Presby
  • Carla Carratalá-Ros
  • Alev Ecevitoglu

Best Publications

  • The mysterious motivational functions of mesolimbic dopamine.

    John D. Salamone;Mercè Correa;Mercè Correa

  • Effort-related functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine and associated forebrain circuits.

    John D. Salamone;Merce Correa;Merce Correa;Andrew M. Farrar;Susana Mingote

  • Motivational views of reinforcement: implications for understanding the behavioral functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine.

    John D Salamone;Mercè Correa

  • Beyond the reward hypothesis: alternative functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine

    JD Salamone;M Correa;SM Mingote;SM Weber

  • Nucleus Accumbens Dopamine and the Regulation of Effort in Food-Seeking Behavior: Implications for Studies of Natural Motivation, Psychiatry, and Drug Abuse

    John D Salamone;Merce Correa;Susana M Mingote;Suzanne M Weber

  • Dopamine, Behavioral Economics, and Effort

    John D Salamone;Merce Correa;Andrew M Farrar;Eric J Nunes

  • Activational and effort-related aspects of motivation: neural mechanisms and implications for psychopathology

    John D. Salamone;Samantha E. Yohn;Laura López-Cruz;Noemí San Miguel

  • Dopaminergic Modulation of Effort-Related Choice Behavior as Assessed by a Progressive Ratio Chow Feeding Choice Task: Pharmacological Studies and the Role of Individual Differences

    Patrick A. Randall;Marta Pardo;Marta Pardo;Eric J. Nunes;Laura López Cruz;Laura López Cruz

  • Nucleus accumbens dopamine depletions make animals highly sensitive to high fixed ratio requirements but do not impair primary food reinforcement.

    J.D Salamone;A Wisniecki;B.B Carlson;M Correa

  • Mesolimbic Dopamine and the Regulation of Motivated Behavior

    John D. Salamone;Marta Pardo;Samantha E. Yohn;Laura López-Cruz

  • The behavioral pharmacology of effort-related choice behavior: dopamine, adenosine and beyond

    John D. Salamone;Merce Correa;Eric J. Nunes;Patrick A. Randall

  • Bupropion Increases Selection of High Effort Activity in Rats Tested on a Progressive Ratio/Chow Feeding Choice Procedure: Implications for Treatment of Effort-Related Motivational Symptoms

    Patrick A. Randall;Christie A. Lee;Samantha J. Podurgiel;Evan Hart

  • Dopamine, Effort-Based Choice, and Behavioral Economics: Basic and Translational Research.

    John D. Salamone;Merce Correa;Jen-Hau Yang;Renee Rotolo

  • Nucleus accumbens dopamine and work requirements on interval schedules.

    Mercè Correa;Brian B Carlson;Anna Wisniecki;John D Salamone

  • Nucleus accumbens neurotransmission and effort-related choice behavior in food motivation: Effects of drugs acting on dopamine, adenosine, and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors

    Eric J. Nunes;Patrick A. Randall;Samantha Podurgiel;Mercè Correa;Mercè Correa

  • Accumbens dopamine and the regulation of effort in food-seeking behavior: modulation of work output by different ratio or force requirements.

    Keita Ishiwari;Suzanne M. Weber;Susana Mingote;Mercè Correa

  • Effort-related motivational effects of the VMAT-2 inhibitor tetrabenazine: Implications for animal models of the motivational symptoms of depression

    Eric J. Nunes;Patrick A. Randall;Evan E. Hart;Charlotte Freeland

  • Nucleus Accumbens Dopamine and the Forebrain Circuitry Involved in Behavioral Activation and Effort-Related Decision Making: Implications for Understanding Anergia and Psychomotor Slowing in Depression

    John D. Salamone;Merce Correa;Susana M. Mingote;Suzanne M. Weber

  • The adenosine A2A antagonist KF17837 reverses the locomotor suppression and tremulous jaw movements induced by haloperidol in rats: possible relevance to parkinsonism.

    M Correa;A Wisniecki;A Betz;D.R Dobson

  • Nucleus accumbens and effort-related functions: behavioral and neural markers of the interactions between adenosine A2A and dopamine D2 receptors

    A.M. Farrar;K.N. Segovia;P.A. Randall;E.J. Nunes

Frequent Co-Authors

John D. Salamone
John D. Salamone University of Connecticut
Christa E. Müller
Christa E. Müller University of Bonn
Olga Valverde
Olga Valverde Pompeu Fabra University
Catherine Ledent
Catherine Ledent Université Libre de Bruxelles
Alexandros Makriyannis
Alexandros Makriyannis Northeastern University
Gert Lubec
Gert Lubec Paracelsus Medical University
Marco Pistis
Marco Pistis University of Cagliari
Michael J. O'Neill
Michael J. O'Neill Eli Lilly (United States)
Christian Pifl
Christian Pifl Medical University of Vienna
Philip McGuire
Philip McGuire University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re passionate about neuroscience but also exploring adjacent career paths or interdisciplinary studies, there are several online degree options worth considering. Many students combine neuroscience with psychology or social work to expand their skillsets and employment opportunities.

Those interested in the mental health field can look into affordable online msw programs, which prepare graduates for impactful roles in social services. Alternatively, pursuing an online social work program allows for flexible learning and faster entry into the workforce.

For students aiming to enter behavioral analysis, bcba certification programs are highly relevant, especially for those interested in applied behavior analysis. Similarly, an accelerated online bachelor's degree in psychology is a strong foundation for neuroscience-related careers in research, counseling, or education.

Choosing the right online program can mean greater flexibility, lower costs, and faster completion, helping you launch or advance your career in neuroscience and its related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Mercè Correa

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles