World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
86
Citations
29723
World Ranking
14040
National Ranking
7122

William J. Hoskins publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William J. Hoskins sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 283 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

William J. Hoskins D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William J. Hoskins sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1933 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

William J. Hoskins is affiliated with Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in the United States. The scientist's academic activities include contributions that have been recognized across their career.

Hoskins was awarded the title of Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1933. This designation highlights their standing within the scientific community during that period.

There is no publicly available information on recent publications or papers authored by Hoskins. Similarly, details regarding frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, and specific fields or subfields of study have not been documented.

Best Publications

  • Cyclophosphamide and Cisplatin Compared With Paclitaxel and Cisplatin in Patients with Stage III and Stage IV Ovarian Cancer

    William P. McGuire;William J. Hoskins;Mark F. Brady;Paul R. Kucera

  • impact of Hospital Volume on Operative Mortality for Major Cancer Surgery

    Colin B. Begg;Laura D. Cramer;William J. Hoskins;Murray F. Brennan

  • Intraperitoneal cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide versus intravenous cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide for stage III ovarian cancer

    David S. Alberts;P. Y. Liu;Edward V. Hannigan;Robert O'Toole

  • Second-line platinum therapy in patients with ovarian cancer previously treated with cisplatin.

    M Markman;R Rothman;T Hakes;B Reichman

  • The effect of diameter of largest residual disease on survival after primary cytoreductive surgery in patients with suboptimal residual epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

    William J. Hoskins;William P. McGuire;Mark F. Brady;Howard D. Homesley

  • Symptom prevalence, characteristics and distress in a cancer population

    R. K. Portenoy;H. T. Thaler;A. B. Kornblith;J. McCarthy Lepore

  • Ovarian Cancer: Screening, Treatment, and Follow-up

    Vicki Seltzer;Bruce H. Drukker;Brenda W. Gillespie;Lynn M. Gossfeld

  • The influence of cytoreductive surgery on recurrence-free interval and survival in small volume stage III epithelial ovarian cancer : a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

    W J Hoskins;B N Bundy;J T Thigpen;G A Omura

  • Clinicopathologic Features of BRCA-Linked and Sporadic Ovarian Cancer

    Jeff Boyd;Yukio Sonoda;Mark G. Federici;Faina Bogomolniy

  • Defining response of ovarian carcinoma to initial chemotherapy according to serum CA 125.

    G. J. S. Rustin;A. E. Nelstrop;P. Mcclean;M. F. Brady

  • Identification of prognostic factors in advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

    Dennis S. Chi;John B. Liao;Larry F. Leon;Ennapadam S. Venkatraman

  • Determinants of increased risk for recurrence in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for stage IB and IIA carcinoma of the cervix.

    Arlan F. Fuller;Nancy Elliott;Cynthia Kosloff;William J. Hoskins

  • Stage IV Ovarian Cancer: Impact of Surgical Debulking1

    John P. Curtin;Rizwan Malik;Ennapadam S. Venkatraman;Richard R. Barakat

  • Assessment of Dose-Intensive Therapy in Suboptimally Debulked Ovarian Cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study

    William P. McGuire;William J. Hoskins;Mark F. Brady;Howard D. Homesley

  • RESPONSES TO SALVAGE CHEMOTHERAPY IN OVARIAN CANCER: A CRITICAL NEED FOR PRECISE DEFINITIONS OF THE TREATED POPULATION

    M Markman;W Hoskins

  • Responses to second-line cisplatin-based intraperitoneal therapy in ovarian cancer: influence of a prior response to intravenous cisplatin.

    M Markman;B Reichman;T Hakes;W Jones

  • Diagnosis and Management of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

    Snehal Bhoola;William J. Hoskins

  • The Ability of Preoperative Serum CA-125 to Predict Optimal Primary Tumor Cytoreduction in Stage III Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma

    Dennis S. Chi;Ennapadam S. Venkatraman;Vivek Masson;William J. Hoskins

  • Variations in institutional infrastructure, physician specialization and experience, and outcome in ovarian cancer: A systematic review

    Andreas du Bois;Justine Rochon;Jacobus Pfisterer;William J. Hoskins

  • Phase I feasibility and pharmacologic study of weekly intraperitoneal paclitaxel: a Gynecologic Oncology Group pilot Study.

    P Francis;E Rowinsky;J Schneider;T Hakes

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen C. Rubin
Stephen C. Rubin University of Pennsylvania
Richard R. Barakat
Richard R. Barakat Northwell Health
Maurie Markman
Maurie Markman The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Dennis S. Chi
Dennis S. Chi Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Kenneth O. Lloyd
Kenneth O. Lloyd Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Carol Aghajanian
Carol Aghajanian Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum
Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Yukio Sonoda
Yukio Sonoda Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
David S. Alberts
David S. Alberts University of Arizona
Michael J. Birrer
Michael J. Birrer University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Medicine involves various educational routes, and online degrees are making these pathways more accessible than ever. For those interested in pharmaceutical sciences, online pharmacy programs offer flexible and affordable options to earn a doctorate and advance in pharmacy practice.

Those who are passionate about healthcare management and technology can explore a health information technology online degree, which prepares students for in-demand roles handling medical data and ensuring healthcare compliance.

For a quicker entry into the medical field, consider earning a cheapest medical coding certification online to begin a career in medical coding and billing—an essential part of healthcare administration.

If your goal is to become a nurse practitioner, cheapest fnp programs online can help you achieve this advanced credential with the convenience of remote learning.

Online medical degrees open up numerous career opportunities and serve as a flexible solution for those balancing studies with other life commitments.

Best Scientists Citing William J. Hoskins

Recently Published Articles