World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 40 9427 9157 22 21 167 5288

Nuno Neves publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nuno Neves between 1993 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nuno Neves published across 32 years, from 1993 to 2024, averaging 5.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2007. 4 of the 173 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2007. 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 2 publications 2024: 2 publications
1993 2024

173 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nuno Neves: publications per year, 1993 to 2024
Year Publications
1993 2
1994 3
1995 0
1996 4
1997 3
1998 4
1999 1
2000 2
2001 5
2002 4
2003 3
2004 11
2005 13
2006 9
2007 15
2008 9
2009 10
2010 5
2011 9
2012 2
2013 7
2014 4
2015 3
2016 10
2017 7
2018 6
2019 8
2020 9
2021 0
2022 1
2023 2
2024 2
Total 173
Download as CSV

Nuno Neves publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nuno Neves sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 162–171 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 167 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534 167
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Nuno Neves D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nuno Neves sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907 40
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Nuno Neves is affiliated with the University of Lisbon in Portugal and specializes primarily in the fields of Computer Science and Medicine. Their research spans areas including Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, Signal Processing, and Electrical and Electronic Engineering.

The scientist's work focuses on several main topics, including:

  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
  • IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • IoT Networks and Protocols
  • Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Web Application Security Vulnerabilities

Nuno Neves has contributed to recent papers such as:

  • "Statically Detecting Vulnerabilities by Processing Programming Languages as Natural Languages," 2022, published in IEEE Transactions on Reliability
  • "Secure multi-cloud virtual network embedding," 2020, published in Computer Communications
  • "A Segurança de Software necessita de atualização quando confrontada com a realidade da aprendizagem automática distribuída?," 2024, published in Computação Brasil.
  • "Assessment of chronic pain: multidimensional tools, applicability, and practicality," 2024, published in Revista Portuguesa de Clínica Geral

Frequent co-authors in their work include Pedro Gomes, Naércio Magaia, Ibéria Medeiros, Miguel Correia, and Leyla Bilge.

The venues where Nuno Neves has published frequently are:

  • IEEE Transactions on Reliability
  • Computer Communications
  • Computação Brasil.
  • Revista Portuguesa de Clínica Geral

In addition to journal articles, Nuno Neves has contributed to scholarly books, including a publication with Springer Science+Business Media titled "Detection of Intrusions and Malware, and Vulnerability Assessment" in 2021.

Best Publications

  • Intrusion-tolerant architectures: concepts and design

    Paulo Esteves Veríssimo;Nuno Ferreira Neves;Miguel Pupo Correia

  • Highly Available Intrusion-Tolerant Services with Proactive-Reactive Recovery

    P. Sousa;A.N. Bessani;M. Correia;N.F. Neves

  • How to tolerate half less one Byzantine nodes in practical distributed systems

    M. Correia;N.F. Neves;P. Verissimo

  • Adaptive recovery for mobile environments

    N. Neves;W.K. Fuchs

  • From Consensus to Atomic Broadcast: Time-Free Byzantine-Resistant Protocols without Signatures

    Miguel Correia;Nuno Ferreira Neves;Paulo Veríssimo

  • Detecting and Removing Web Application Vulnerabilities with Static Analysis and Data Mining

    Iberia Medeiros;Nuno Neves;Miguel Correia

  • Adaptive recovery for mobile environments

    Nuno Neves;W. Kent Fuchs

  • SCFS: a shared cloud-backed file system

    Alysson Bessani;Ricardo Mendes;Tiago Oliveira;Nuno Neves

  • OS diversity for intrusion tolerance: Myth or reality?

    Miguel Garcia;Alysson Bessani;Ilir Gashi;Nuno Neves

  • Analysis of operating system diversity for intrusion tolerance

    Miguel Garcia;Alysson Bessani;Ilir Gashi;Nuno Neves

  • Intrusion-tolerant middleware: the road to automatic security

    P.E. Verissimo;N.F. Neves;C. Cachin;J. Poritz

  • Reverse Engineering of Protocols from Network Traces

    Joao Antunes;Nuno Neves;Paulo Verissimo

  • Automatic detection and correction of web application vulnerabilities using data mining to predict false positives

    Ibéria Medeiros;Nuno F. Neves;Miguel Correia

  • The Crutial Way of Critical Infrastructure Protection

    A.N. Bessani;P. Sousa;M. Correia;N.F. Neves

  • Byzantine consensus in asynchronous message-passing systems: a survey

    Miguel Correia;Giuliana Santos Veronese;Nuno Ferreira Neves;Paulo Verissimo

  • The Design of a COTS Real-Time Distributed Security Kernel

    Miguel Correia;Paulo Veríssimo;Nuno Ferreira Neves

  • A checkpoint protocol for an entry consistent shared memory system

    Nuno Neves;Miguel Castro;Paulo Guedes

  • Resilient Intrusion Tolerance through Proactive and Reactive Recovery

    P. Sousa;A.N. Bessani;M. Correia;N.F. Neves

  • BigFlow: Real-time and reliable anomaly-based intrusion detection for high-speed networks

    Eduardo Viegas;Eduardo Viegas;Altair Olivo Santin;Alysson Bessani;Nuno Neves

  • Lightweight logging for lazy release consistent distributed shared memory

    Manuel Costa;Paulo Guedes;Manuel Sequeira;Nuno Neves

Frequent Co-Authors

Paulo Veríssimo
Paulo Veríssimo King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Miguel Correia
Miguel Correia Instituto Superior Técnico
W.K. Fuchs
W.K. Fuchs University of Florida
Miguel Castro
Miguel Castro Microsoft (United States)
Christian Cachin
Christian Cachin University of Bern
Marco Vieira
Marco Vieira University of North Carolina at Charlotte
José Rui Figueira
José Rui Figueira Instituto Superior Técnico
Brian Randell
Brian Randell Newcastle University
Michael Waidner
Michael Waidner Technical University of Darmstadt
Andrea Bondavalli
Andrea Bondavalli University of Florence

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the demand for skilled technology professionals grows, many students are exploring flexible education options beyond traditional on-campus Computer Science degrees. Online programs can be a great way to advance your career goals while balancing personal and work responsibilities.

For those needing a quicker path, online associates degree programs offer foundational tech knowledge and open doors to entry-level jobs. If you’re considering a broader business role in the tech industry, pursuing an online degree in business can provide essential management and entrepreneurial skills.

Concerns about tuition costs are common. That’s why research into the cheapest online college programs is valuable. Affordable education can help reduce student debt and make higher learning more accessible. Additionally, for students interested in areas like software, robotics, or hardware, engineering online programs can be an excellent alternative or complement to Computer Science.

Exploring related online degrees and diverse career pathways is a smart way to tailor your education and prepare for the evolving demands of the tech industry.

Best Scientists Citing Nuno Neves

Trending Scientists