World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
5245
World Ranking
8536
National Ranking
3647

W.K. Fuchs publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where W.K. Fuchs sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 150 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

W.K. Fuchs D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where W.K. Fuchs sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2010 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 2000 - ACM Fellow For contributions to reliable computing.
  • 1995 - IEEE Fellow For contributions reliable computing.

Overview

W.K. Fuchs is a researcher affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States. Over the course of their career, they have been recognized with several distinguished fellowships in professional organizations related to computing and science.

Notably, W.K. Fuchs was named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2010. This honor signifies recognition within the broader scientific community.

Earlier distinctions include becoming an ACM Fellow in 2000, acknowledged specifically for contributions to reliable computing. This fellowship highlights achievements in the field of computer science and technology.

Additionally, Fuchs was recognized as an IEEE Fellow in 1995, with the citation also referring to their work in reliable computing. This acknowledgment by IEEE further establishes their work within the electrical and electronics engineering communities.

Best Publications

  • Fault and error models for VLSI

    J.A. Abraham;W.K. Fuchs

  • Adaptive recovery for mobile environments

    N. Neves;W.K. Fuchs

  • Recoverable distributed shared virtual memory

    K.-L. Wu;W.K. Fuchs

  • Fault Tolerance Techniques for Systolic Arrays

    Abraham;Banerjee;Chien-Yi Chen;Fuchs

  • CATCH - Compiler-Assisted Techniques for Checkpointing

    Chung-Chi Jim Li;W.K. Fuchs

  • Lazy checkpoint coordination for bounding rollback propagation

    Y.-M. Wang;W.K. Fuchs

  • Progressive retry method and apparatus for software failure recovery in multi-process message-passing applications

    Wesley K. Fuchs;Yennun Huang;Yi-Min Wang

  • Error recovery in shared memory multiprocessors using private caches

    K.-L. Wu;W.K. Fuchs;J.H. Patel

  • Optimistic message logging for independent checkpointing in message-passing systems

    Y.-M. Wang;W.K. Fuchs

  • Fault dictionary compression and equivalence class computation for sequential circuits

    Paul G. Ryan;W. Kent Fuchs;Irith Pomeranz

  • CATCH-compiler-assisted techniques for checkpointing

    Unknown

  • Efficient Spare Allocation in Reconfigurable Arrays

    Sy-Yen Kuo;W. Kent Fuchs

  • TRAPEDS: producing traces for multicomputers via execution driven simulation

    C. B. Stunkel;W. K. Fuchs

  • Message logging in mobile computing

    Bin Yao;Kuo-Feng Ssu;W.K. Fuchs

  • Input sequence reordering method for software failure recovery

    Wesley K. Fuchs;Yennun Huang;Yi-Min Wang

  • TWO-STAGE FAULT LOCATION

    P.G. Ryan;S. Rawat;W.K. Fuchs

  • Reduced overhead logging for rollback recovery in distributed shared memory

    G. Suri;B. Jannsens;W.K. Fuchs

  • Progressive retry for software error recovery in distributed systems

    Y.-M. Wang;Y. Huang;W.K. Fuchs

  • Full fault dictionary storage based on labeled tree encoding

    V. Boppana;I. Hartanto;W.K. Fuchs

  • Checkpoint space reclamation for uncoordinated checkpointing in message-passing systems

    Yi-Min Wang;Pi-Yu Chung;In-Jen Lin;W.K. Fuchs

  • Rapid Diagnostic Fault Simulation of Stuck-at Faults in Sequential Circuits using Compact Lists

    Srikanth Venkataraman;Ismed Hartanto;W. Kent Fuchs;Elizabeth M. Rudnick

Frequent Co-Authors

Janak H. Patel
Janak H. Patel University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Yi-Min Wang
Yi-Min Wang Microsoft (United States)
Nuno Neves
Nuno Neves University of Lisbon
Wen-mei W. Hwu
Wen-mei W. Hwu University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Jacob A. Abraham
Jacob A. Abraham The University of Texas at Austin
Irith Pomeranz
Irith Pomeranz Purdue University West Lafayette
Kun-Lung Wu
Kun-Lung Wu IBM (United States)
Ibrahim N. Hajj
Ibrahim N. Hajj University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Pinaki Mazumder
Pinaki Mazumder University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Sy-Yen Kuo
Sy-Yen Kuo National Taiwan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Computer Science degree in the USA opens up many related online study options and dynamic career paths. Many students also consider an online bachelor's degree in physics for its strong problem-solving foundation, mathematical rigor, and relevance to tech innovation.

As the demand for data skills increases, students often seek what is the cheapest data science course in the us? to gain practical skills in analytics, AI, and machine learning without incurring high tuition costs. Electrical engineering also overlaps heavily with computer science, especially in areas like hardware, robotics, and embedded systems. If you're curious about rankings, check out the latest online electrical engineering degree ranking to find top-quality programs nationwide.

For those seeking quicker career entry, there are also short certificate programs that pay well in the IT field. These certificates offer targeted training and can boost job prospects in months rather than years.

Best Scientists Citing W.K. Fuchs

Recently Published Articles