World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
5813
World Ranking
9392
National Ranking
150

Roy Friedman publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roy Friedman sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 237 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Roy Friedman D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roy Friedman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Roy Friedman is affiliated with the Technion - Israel Institute of Technology. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with a significant focus on subfields including Computer Networks and Communications, Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Hardware and Architecture, and Signal Processing.

Their work covers a range of topics related to data handling and computing systems. Key areas of research include:

  • Caching and Content Delivery
  • Advanced Data Storage Technologies
  • Data Stream Mining Techniques
  • Advanced Database Systems and Queries
  • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Distributed systems and fault tolerance
  • Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications

Roy Friedman's recent publications illustrate active engagement in both theoretical and applied aspects of these domains. Selected papers include:

  • "FireLedger," 2020, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
  • "Together is Better: Heavy Hitters Quantile Estimation," 2023, Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data
  • "Access Strategies for Network Caching," 2021, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking
  • "Lightweight Robust Size Aware Cache Management," 2022, ACM Transactions on Storage
  • "Box queries over multi-dimensional streams," 2022, Information Systems

They have frequently published in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data
  • IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking

Roy Friedman collaborates regularly with several coauthors. Frequent collaborators include Gil Einziger, Rana Shahout, Ran Ben Basat, Ohad Eytan, and Dolev Adas.

Best Publications

  • On Power and Throughput Tradeoffs of WiFi and Bluetooth in Smartphones

    R. Friedman;A. Kogan;Y. Krivolapov

  • On power and throughput tradeoffs of WiFi and Bluetooth in smartphones

    Roy Friedman;Alex Kogan;Yevgeny Krivolapov

  • Starfish: fault-tolerant dynamic MPI programs on clusters of workstations

    A.M. Agbaria;R. Friedman

  • Strong and weak virtual synchrony in Horus

    R. Friedman;R. van Renesse

  • Nitrosketch: robust and general sketch-based monitoring in software switches

    Zaoxing Liu;Ran Ben-Basat;Gil Einziger;Yaron Kassner

  • A framework for protocol composition in Horus

    Robbert van Renesse;Kenneth P. Birman;Roy Friedman;Mark Hayden

  • TinyLFU: A Highly Efficient Cache Admission Policy

    Gil Einziger;Roy Friedman;Ben Manes

  • Heavy hitters in streams and sliding windows

    Ran Ben-Basat;Gil Einziger;Roy Friedman;Yaron Kassner

  • Constant Time Updates in Hierarchical Heavy Hitters

    Ran Ben Basat;Gil Einziger;Roy Friedman;Marcelo C. Luizelli

  • Packing messages as a tool for boosting the performance of total ordering protocols

    R. Friedman;R. van Renesse

  • Lower bounds for asynchronous consensus

    Leslie Lamport

  • Failure detectors in omission failure environments

    Danny Dolev;Roy Friedman;Idit Keidar;Dahlia Malkhi

  • RaWMS - Random Walk Based Lightweight Membership Service for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks

    Ziv Bar-Yossef;Roy Friedman;Gabriel Kliot

  • TinyLFU: A Highly Efficient Cache Admission Policy

    Gil Einziger;Roy Friedman

  • Reliable time delay-constrained cluster computing

    Roy Friedman;Kenneth P. Birman;Srinivasan Keshav;Werner Vogels

  • Gossiping on MANETs: the beauty and the beast

    Roy Friedman;Daniela Gavidia;Luis Rodrigues;Aline Carneiro Viana

  • Simple and efficient oracle-based consensus protocols for asynchronous Byzantine systems

    R. Friedman;A. Mostefaoui;M. Raynal

  • Randomized admission policy for efficient top-k and frequency estimation

    Ran Ben Basat;Gil Einziger;Roy Friedman;Yaron Kassner

  • RAPID: Reliable Probabilistic Dissemination in Wireless Ad-Hoc Networks

    V. Drabkin;R. Friedman;G. Kliot;M. Segal

  • Implementing a Caching Service for Distributed CORBA Objects

    Gregory V. Chockler;Danny Dolev;Roy Friedman;Roman Vitenberg

  • Cloud-based computation offloading for mobile devices: State of the art, challenges and opportunities

    Lei Jiao;Roy Friedman;Xiaoming Fu;Stefano Secci

  • Starfish: Fault-Tolerant Dynamic MPI Programs on Clusters of Workstations

    Adnan Agbaria;Roy Friedman

Frequent Co-Authors

Michel Raynal
Michel Raynal Institut de Recherche en Informatique et Systèmes Aléatoires
Kenneth P. Birman
Kenneth P. Birman Cornell University
Hagit Attiya
Hagit Attiya Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Danny Dolev
Danny Dolev Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Assaf Schuster
Assaf Schuster Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Anne-Marie Kermarrec
Anne-Marie Kermarrec École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Sergio Rajsbaum
Sergio Rajsbaum National Autonomous University of Mexico
Ran El-Yaniv
Ran El-Yaniv Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Eli Biham
Eli Biham Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Jennifer L. Welch
Jennifer L. Welch Texas A&M University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can open doors to multiple STEM careers beyond on-campus Computer Science options in the USA. If you are looking to complete your studies quickly and enter the tech workforce sooner, consider the fastest computer science degree programs available online. These programs help ambitious students fast-track their learning and build essential skills efficiently.

For those interested in addressing environmental issues, pursuing the cheapest online environmental science degree is a practical way to gain expertise in a growing field without significant financial burden. Similarly, the cheapest online mechanical engineering degree offers pathways in design, manufacturing, and robotics for cost-conscious learners.

Students fascinated by the fundamental laws of nature should look into an online theoretical physics degree. This program is ideal for those who wish to deepen their understanding of physics concepts without relocating or sacrificing flexibility.

Exploring these online alternatives not only broadens your career options but can also fit a variety of budgets, schedules, and learning goals.

Best Scientists Citing Roy Friedman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles