World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
48
Citations
7318
World Ranking
6256
National Ranking
98

Idit Keidar publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Idit Keidar sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 249 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Idit Keidar D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Idit Keidar sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Idit Keidar is affiliated with the Technion - Israel Institute of Technology in Israel. Their research primarily spans the field of computer science with a focus on distributed systems and fault tolerance.

Their recent publications include:

  • "KiWi," 2020, ACM Transactions on Parallel Computing
  • "Expected linear round synchronization: the missing link for linear Byzantine SMR," 2024, Distributed Computing
  • "Not a COINcidence: Sub-Quadratic Asynchronous Byzantine Agreement WHP," 2020, Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • "Not a COINcidence: Sub-Quadratic Asynchronous Byzantine Agreement WHP," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Cordial Miners: Fast and Efficient Consensus for Every Eventuality," 2022, Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Idit Keidar include:

  • Shir Cohen
  • Oded Naor
  • Arik Rinberg
  • Alexander Spiegelman
  • Edward Bortnikov

Publication venues where Idit Keidar has frequently contributed encompass:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • ACM Transactions on Parallel Computing
  • Distributed Computing
  • ACM SIGACT News

Their research contributions cover a range of topics within computer science, specifically:

  • Distributed systems and fault tolerance
  • Advanced database systems and queries
  • Cryptography and data security
  • Blockchain technology applications and security
  • Advanced data storage technologies
  • DNA and biological computing
  • Cloud computing and resource management

Within the broader field of computer science, their work is situated primarily in the subfields of:

  • Computer networks and communications
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Information systems
  • Management science and operations research
  • Molecular biology

Best Publications

  • Group communication specifications: a comprehensive study

    Gregory V. Chockler;Idit Keidar;Roman Vitenberg

  • Trusting the cloud

    Christian Cachin;Idit Keidar;Alexander Shraer

  • GPUfs: integrating a file system with GPUs

    Mark Silberstein;Bryan Ford;Idit Keidar;Emmett Witchel

  • Byzantine disk paxos: optimal resilience with byzantine shared memory

    Ittai Abraham;Gregory V. Chockler;Idit Keidar;Dahlia Malkhi

  • NoC-Based FPGA: Architecture and Routing

    R. Gindin;I. Cidon;I. Keidar

  • On the cost of fault-tolerant consensus when there are no faults: preliminary version

    Idit Keidar;Sergio Rajsbaum

  • Brahms: Byzantine resilient random membership sampling

    Edward Bortnikov;Maxim Gurevich;Idit Keidar;Gabriel Kliot

  • Venus: verification for untrusted cloud storage

    Alexander Shraer;Christian Cachin;Asaf Cidon;Idit Keidar

  • Do not crawl in the DUST: Different URLs with similar text

    Ziv Bar-Yossef;Idit Keidar;Uri Schonfeld

  • Dynamic atomic storage without consensus

    Marcos K. Aguilera;Idit Keidar;Dahlia Malkhi;Alexander Shraer

  • Many-Core vs. Many-Thread Machines: Stay Away From the Valley

    Z. Guz;E. Bolotin;I. Keidar;A. Kolodny

  • Failure detectors in omission failure environments

    Danny Dolev;Roy Friedman;Idit Keidar;Dahlia Malkhi

  • On maintaining multiple versions in STM

    Dmitri Perelman;Rui Fan;Idit Keidar

  • Impossibility Results and Lower Bounds for Consensus under Link Failures

    Ulrich Schmid;Bettina Weiss;Idit Keidar

  • Efficient message ordering in dynamic networks

    Idit Keidar;Danny Dolev

  • Moshe: A group membership service for WANs

    Idit Keidar;Jeremy Sussman;Keith Marzullo;Danny Dolev

  • Scaling concurrent log-structured data stores

    Guy Golan-Gueta;Edward Bortnikov;Eshcar Hillel;Idit Keidar

  • Dynamic voting for consistent primary components

    Danny Dolev;Idit Keidar;Esti Yeger Lotem

  • All You Need is DAG

    Idit Keidar;Eleftherios Kokoris-Kogias;Oded Naor;Alexander Spiegelman

  • Distributed Compressed Sensing for Static and Time-Varying Networks

    Stacy Patterson;Yonina C. Eldar;Idit Keidar

  • On the Cost of Fault-Tolerant Consensus When There Are No Faults – A Tutorial

    Idit Keidar;Sergio Rajsbaum

Frequent Co-Authors

Dahlia Malkhi
Dahlia Malkhi Diem Association
Danny Dolev
Danny Dolev Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Christian Cachin
Christian Cachin University of Bern
Assaf Schuster
Assaf Schuster Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Amir Herzberg
Amir Herzberg University of Connecticut
Sergio Rajsbaum
Sergio Rajsbaum National Autonomous University of Mexico
Avinoam Kolodny
Avinoam Kolodny Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Yonina C. Eldar
Yonina C. Eldar Weizmann Institute of Science

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your computer science education opens up diverse online opportunities in related fields. For those interested in the data-driven aspects of technology, pursuing an online masters for data science can deepen analytical and programming skills, preparing graduates for roles across tech, healthcare, and business sectors.

If project leadership appeals to you, a 2 year construction management degree offers a quick path to careers combining technology, engineering, and on-site management. This option is ideal for those wanting to blend IT knowledge with practical project execution.

Looking to develop strong business acumen alongside your technical expertise? Consider accredited mba programs delivered entirely online. These programs can help you climb the corporate ladder or become an entrepreneur in the tech field.

For accelerated advancement, explore one year masters programs online. These intensive courses allow you to upskill or pivot careers quickly and affordably, providing a fast track to in-demand roles across tech and management.

Best Scientists Citing Idit Keidar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles