World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marcos K. Aguilera

Marcos K. Aguilera

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
52
Citations
10317
World Ranking
5107
National Ranking
2359

Marcos K. Aguilera publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcos K. Aguilera sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 157 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Marcos K. Aguilera D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcos K. Aguilera sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marcos K. Aguilera is affiliated with VMware in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of computer science, with a particular focus on systems and architecture. Their work spans multiple subfields including computer networks and communications, hardware and architecture, and information systems, with interdisciplinary contributions reaching into cellular and molecular neuroscience as well as psychiatry and mental health.

Their research topics cover a broad spectrum, prominently featuring advanced data storage technologies and parallel computing and optimization techniques. Other significant areas of their work include distributed systems and fault tolerance, cloud computing and resource management, real-time systems scheduling, photoreceptor and optogenetics research, and age of information optimization.

Marcos K. Aguilera has been a frequent contributor to several publication venues. The most common platforms for their research dissemination include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ACM Transactions on Storage
  • Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
  • ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review
  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)

The scientist's recent notable publications include:

  • "DINOMO" (2022) in Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
  • "Memory disaggregation: why now and what are the challenges" (2023) in ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review
  • "Microsecond Consensus for Microsecond Applications" (2020) in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Frugal Byzantine Computing" (2021) in Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • "uBFT: Microsecond-scale BFT using Disaggregated Memory [Extended Version]" (2022) in arXiv (Cornell University)

Their collaborations include frequent co-authorship with researchers such as Rachid Guerraoui, Athanasios Xygkis, Igor Zablotchi, Naama Ben-David, and Sekwon Lee.

Marcos K. Aguilera's body of work predominantly resides within the overarching field of computer science, underpinning advancements in distributed system technologies, network communications, and hardware design innovations.

Best Publications

  • Matching events in a content-based subscription system

    Marcos K. Aguilera;Robert E. Strom;Daniel C. Sturman;Mark Astley

  • Performance debugging for distributed systems of black boxes

    Marcos K. Aguilera;Jeffrey C. Mogul;Janet L. Wiener;Patrick Reynolds

  • On the quality of service of failure detectors

    Wei Chen;Sam Toueg;M.K. Aguilera

  • Transactional storage for geo-replicated systems

    Yair Sovran;Russell Power;Marcos K. Aguilera;Jinyang Li

  • Sinfonia: a new paradigm for building scalable distributed systems

    Marcos K. Aguilera;Arif Merchant;Mehul Shah;Alistair Veitch

  • Consistency-based service level agreements for cloud storage

    Douglas B. Terry;Vijayan Prabhakaran;Ramakrishna Kotla;Mahesh Balakrishnan

  • Heartbeat: A Timeout-Free Failure Detector for Quiescent Reliable Communication

    Marcos Kawazoe Aguilera;Wei Chen;Sam Toueg

  • Failure detection and consensus in the crash-recovery model

    Marcos Kawazoe Aguilera;Wei Chen;Sam Toueg

  • A practical scalable distributed B-tree

    Marcos K. Aguilera;Wojciech Golab;Mehul A. Shah

  • Distributed Computing and Networking

    Marcos K. Aguilera;Haifeng Yu;Nitin H. Vaidya;Vikram Srinivasan

  • Using erasure codes efficiently for storage in a distributed system

    M.K. Aguilera;R. Janakiraman;L. Xu

  • Stable Leader Election

    Marcos Kawazoe Aguilera;Carole Delporte-Gallet;Hugues Fauconnier;Sam Toueg

  • Communication-efficient leader election and consensus with limited link synchrony

    Marcos K. Aguilera;Carole Delporte-Gallet;Hugues Fauconnier;Sam Toueg

  • Transaction chains: achieving serializability with low latency in geo-distributed storage systems

    Yang Zhang;Russell Power;Siyuan Zhou;Yair Sovran

  • On implementing omega with weak reliability and synchrony assumptions

    Marcos K. Aguilera;Carole Delporte-Gallet;Hugues Fauconnier;Sam Toueg

  • WAP5: black-box performance debugging for wide-area systems

    Patrick Reynolds;Janet L. Wiener;Jeffrey C. Mogul;Marcos K. Aguilera

  • CONSISTENCY METHOD AND CONSISTENCY SYSTEM

    Reuter James M;Veitch Alistair;Aguilera Marcos K

  • Using the heartbeat failure detector for quiescent reliable communication and consensus in partitionable networks

    Marcos Kawazoe Aguilera;Wei Chen;Sam Toueg

  • Snapshots in distributed storage systems

    Marcos K. Aguilera;Alistair Veitch;Susan Spence

  • Can far memory improve job throughput

    Emmanuel Amaro;Christopher Branner-Augmon;Zhihong Luo;Amy Ousterhout

  • Partial synchrony based on set timeliness

    Marcos K. Aguilera;Carole Delporte-Gallet;Hugues Fauconnier;Sam Toueg

Frequent Co-Authors

Sam Toueg
Sam Toueg University of Toronto
Arif Merchant
Arif Merchant Google (United States)
Alistair Veitch
Alistair Veitch Google (United States)
Mahesh Balakrishnan
Mahesh Balakrishnan Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
Rachid Guerraoui
Rachid Guerraoui École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Dahlia Malkhi
Dahlia Malkhi Diem Association
Kimberly Keeton
Kimberly Keeton Google (United States)
Jeffrey C. Mogul
Jeffrey C. Mogul Google (United States)
Mark Lillibridge
Mark Lillibridge Meta Platforms, Inc.
Svend Frolund
Svend Frolund project44

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As technology rapidly evolves, more students are considering online pathways for technical degrees. In addition to studying Computer Science in the USA, a number of related online degree programs are available that open doors to dynamic and in-demand career options.

For those interested in sustainability and engineering, earning an environmental engineering bachelor's degree online is a flexible option. Mechanical engineering is also accessible through an online degree for mechanical engineering, supporting careers in design, manufacturing, and robotics.

If you’re drawn to the fundamentals of science, you might ask: can you get a physics degree online? Many institutions do offer reputable online physics degrees that prepare graduates for research, teaching, and high-tech careers.

Data science is another rapidly growing field. With increasing demand for data professionals, students often seek the answers to: what is the cheapest data science course in the us? Affordable online programs can lead to roles in analytics, AI, and business intelligence.

Whether your interest lies in engineering, fundamental sciences, or data, online degrees provide accessible and affordable routes to rewarding careers in technology.

Best Scientists Citing Marcos K. Aguilera

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles