World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
50
Citations
9058
World Ranking
5659
National Ranking
117

Bernard M. E. Moret publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernard M. E. Moret sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 171 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Bernard M. E. Moret D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernard M. E. Moret sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow of the International Society for Computational Biology

Overview

Bernard M. E. Moret is affiliated with the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne in Switzerland. Their research spans multiple domains within computer science and molecular biology, focusing on the intersection of computational methods and biological data analysis.

Their recent publication includes the paper titled Fast computation of approximate weak common intervals in multiple indeterminate strings, published in 2023 in the arXiv (Cornell University) repository.

Moret frequently collaborates with other researchers, notably with Daniel Doerr.

  • arXiv (Cornell University)

The main fields of study for Moret consist of:

  • Computer Science
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Their work includes subfields such as:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Molecular Biology

Key research topics covered by Moret's publications include:

  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Algorithms and Data Compression
  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies

In recognition of their contributions, Moret was awarded the title of Fellow of the International Society for Computational Biology in 2018.

Best Publications

  • How many bootstrap replicates are necessary

    Nicholas D Pattengale;Masoud Alipour;Olaf R P Bininda-Emonds;Bernard M E Moret

  • A linear-time algorithm for computing inversion distance between signed permutations with an experimental study.

    David A. Bader;Bernard M. E. Moret;Mi Yan

  • Decision Trees and Diagrams

    Bernard M. E. Moret

  • How Many Bootstrap Replicates Are Necessary

    Nicholas D. Pattengale;Masoud Alipour;Olaf R. Bininda-Emonds;Bernard M. Moret

  • Phylogenetic Networks: Modeling, Reconstructibility, and Accuracy

    B.M.E. Moret;L. Nakhleh;T. Warnow;C.R. Linder

  • Algorithms from P to NP (vol. 1): design and efficiency

    Bernard M. E. Moret;Henry D. Shapiro

  • A new implementation and detailed study of breakpoint analysis.

    Bernard M. E. Moret;Stacia K. Wyman;David A. Bader;Tandy J. Warnow

  • New approaches for reconstructing phylogenies from gene order data

    Bernard M. E. Moret;Li-San Wang;Tandy J. Warnow;Stacia K. Wyman

  • An empirical analysis of algorithms for constructing a minimum spanning tree

    Bernard M. E. Moret;Henry D. Shapiro

  • Steps toward accurate reconstructions of phylogenies from gene-order data

    Bernard M. E. Moret;Jijun Tang;Li-San Wang;Tandy Warnow

  • Rec-I-DCM3: a fast algorithmic technique for reconstructing phylogenetic trees

    U.W. Roshan;T. Warnow;B.M.E. Moret;T.L. Williams

  • Towards a discipline of experimental algorithmics

    Bernard M. E. Moret

  • The theory of computation

    Bernard M. Moret

  • Map labeling and its generalizations

    Srinivas Doddi;Madhav V. Marathe;Andy Mirzaian;Bernard M. E. Moret

  • An Empirical Comparison of Phylogenetic Methods on Chloroplast Gene Order Data in Campanulaceae

    Mary E. Cosner;Robert K. Jansen;Bernard M. E. Moret;Linda A. Raubeson

  • Inversion Medians Outperform Breakpoint Medians in Phylogeny Reconstruction from Gene-Order Data

    Bernard M. E. Moret;Adam C. Siepel;Jijun Tang;Tao Liu

  • Scaling up accurate phylogenetic reconstruction from gene-order data

    Jijun Tang;Bernard M. E. Moret

  • An empirical assessment of algorithms for constructing a minimum spanning tree

    Bernard M. E. Moret;Henry D. Shapiro

  • A Metric for Phylogenetic Trees Based on Matching

    Yu Lin;Vaibhav Rajan;Bernard M. E. Moret

  • Evaluating synteny for improved comparative studies

    Cristina G. Ghiurcuta;Bernard M. E. Moret

  • On Minimizing a Set of Tests

    Bernard M. E. Moret;Henry D. Shapiro

  • Approximating the true evolutionary distance between two genomes

    Krister M. Swenson;Mark Marron;Joel V. Earnest-Deyoung;Bernard M. E. Moret

Frequent Co-Authors

Tandy Warnow
Tandy Warnow University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Jijun Tang
Jijun Tang University of South Carolina
David A. Bader
David A. Bader New Jersey Institute of Technology
Philipp Bucher
Philipp Bucher École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Li-San Wang
Li-San Wang University of Pennsylvania
Claude W. dePamphilis
Claude W. dePamphilis Pennsylvania State University
Robert K. Jansen
Robert K. Jansen The University of Texas at Austin
David Sankoff
David Sankoff University of Ottawa
Madhav V. Marathe
Madhav V. Marathe University of Virginia
Luay Nakhleh
Luay Nakhleh Rice University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA often leads to broader opportunities in technology and engineering. If you are seeking flexibility, pursuing an online mechanical engineering degree is a great option with strong demand in industry and manufacturing.

For those interested in more theoretical domains, the cheapest online physics degree programs offer affordable routes to versatile scientific careers or further studies.

Data Science is another rapidly growing field closely related to computer science. You can become a data expert with a data scientist degree—a wise choice for those interested in analytics, AI, and big data.

For students who want to blend computing with circuit design, reviewing online electrical engineering career outcomes will help you understand job prospects in power systems, telecommunications, and emerging tech fields.

These related degrees not only share foundational skills with computer science but also open diverse and rewarding career pathways across industries.

Best Scientists Citing Bernard M. E. Moret

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles