World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 42 7572 7061 4076 3702 191 6993

Shane W. Kraus publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Shane W. Kraus between 2007 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Shane W. Kraus published across 20 years, from 2007 to 2026, averaging 14.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 47 publications in 2025. 49 of the 287 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 47. Peak 47 publications in 2025. 2007: 1 publication 2008: 4 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 26 publications 2021: 33 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 25 publications 2024: 38 publications 2025: 47 publications 2026: 2 publications
2007 2026

287 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Shane W. Kraus: publications per year, 2007 to 2026
Year Publications
2007 1
2008 4
2009 9
2010 4
2011 9
2012 3
2013 4
2014 8
2015 9
2016 7
2017 13
2018 11
2019 13
2020 26
2021 33
2022 21
2023 25
2024 38
2025 47
2026 2
Total 287
Download as CSV

Shane W. Kraus publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shane W. Kraus sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 191 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 191
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Shane W. Kraus D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shane W. Kraus sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 42
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Shane W. Kraus is affiliated with the University of Nevada, Las Vegas in the United States. Their primary fields of study are Psychology and Social Sciences, with significant contributions in Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, and General Health Professions.

The scientist's research topics span multiple areas, including:

  • Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Sex work and related issues
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents

Kraus has contributed to scholarly literature in several prominent venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Behavioral Addictions
  • Journal of Gambling Studies
  • Current Addiction Reports
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • International Gambling Studies

Their recent papers cover topics related to behavioral addictions, compulsive sexual behavior, and diagnostic classification. Notable recent publications are:

  • "Which conditions should be considered as disorders in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) designation of 'other specified disorders due to addictive behaviors'?", 2020, Journal of Behavioral Addictions
  • "Sexual addiction 25 years on: A systematic and methodological review of empirical literature and an agenda for future research", 2020, Clinical Psychology Review
  • "Emerging experience with selected new categories in the ICD-11: complex PTSD, prolonged grief disorder, gaming disorder, and compulsive sexual behaviour disorder", 2022, World Psychiatry
  • "The development of the Compulsive Sexual Behavior Disorder Scale (CSBD-19): An ICD-11 based screening measure across three languages", 2020, Journal of Behavioral Addictions
  • "Child Sexual Abuse and Compulsive Sexual Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review", 2020, Current Addiction Reports

Frequent co-authors working alongside Kraus include Joshua B. Grubbs, Marc N. Potenza, Beáta Bőthe, Zsolt Demetrovics, and Mateusz Gola. These collaborations highlight a focus on interdisciplinary approaches to behavioral and addiction research.

Best Publications

  • Compulsive sexual behaviour disorder in the ICD-11.

    Shane W. Kraus;Richard B. Krueger;Peer Briken;Michael B. First

  • Should compulsive sexual behavior be considered an addiction

    Shane W. Kraus;Valerie Voon;Marc N. Potenza

  • Self-reported addiction to pornography in a nationally representative sample: The roles of use habits, religiousness, and moral incongruence.

    Joshua B. Grubbs;Shane W. Kraus;Samuel L. Perry

  • Emerging experience with selected new categories in the ICD‐11: complex PTSD, prolonged grief disorder, gaming disorder, and compulsive sexual behaviour disorder

    Unknown

  • Sexual addiction 25 years on: A systematic and methodological review of empirical literature and an agenda for future research.

    Joshua B. Grubbs;K. Camille Hoagland;Brinna N. Lee;Jennifer T. Grant

  • Internet pornography use and sexual motivation: a systematic review and integration

    Joshua B. Grubbs;Paul J. Wright;Abby L. Braden;Joshua A. Wilt

  • The Pornography Craving Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties

    Shane Kraus;Harold Rosenberg

  • Clinical Characteristics of Men Interested in Seeking Treatment for Use of Pornography

    Shane W. Kraus;Steve Martino;Marc N. Potenza

  • Compulsive Sexual Behavior and Dysregulation of Emotion

    Michał Lew-Starowicz;Karol Lewczuk;Iwona Nowakowska;Shane Kraus

  • Early sexual experiences: the role of Internet access and sexually explicit material.

    Shane W. Kraus;Brenda Russell

  • Is excessive sexual behaviour an addictive disorder

    Marc N Potenza;Mateusz Gola;Mateusz Gola;Valerie Voon;Ariel Kor

  • Examining the psychometric properties of the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale in a sample of compulsive pornography users.

    Shane W. Kraus;Marc N. Potenza;Steve Martino;Jon E. Grant

  • Moral Disapproval and Perceived Addiction to Internet Pornography: A Longitudinal Examination

    Joshua B. Grubbs;Joshua A. Wilt;Julie J. Exline;Kenneth I. Pargament

  • Treatment of Compulsive Pornography Use With Naltrexone: A Case Report.

    Shane W. Kraus;Sarah Meshberg-Cohen;Steve Martino;Lantie J. Quinones

  • The United States Economic Crisis: Young Adults’ Reports of Economic Pressures, Financial and Religious Coping and Psychological Well-Being

    Catherine H. Stein;Erica Hoffmann;Erin E. Bonar;Jaclyn E. Leith

  • Child Sexual Abuse and Compulsive Sexual Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review.

    Melissa N. Slavin;Arielle A. J. Scoglio;Gretchen R. Blycker;Gretchen R. Blycker;Marc N. Potenza

  • Neurocognitive Mechanisms in Compulsive Sexual Behavior Disorder

    Ewelina Kowalewska;Ewelina Kowalewska;Joshua B. Grubbs;Marc N. Potenza;Mateusz Gola;Mateusz Gola

  • Naltrexone and Disulfiram Treatment Response in Veterans With Alcohol Dependence and Co-Occurring Problem-Gambling Features.

    Jon E Grant;Marc N Potenza;Shane W Kraus;Ismene L Petrakis

  • Hitting the Target: Considerations for Differential Diagnosis When Treating Individuals for Problematic Use of Pornography.

    Shane W. Kraus;Shane W. Kraus;Patricia J. Sweeney

Frequent Co-Authors

Marc N. Potenza
Marc N. Potenza Yale University
Joshua B. Grubbs
Joshua B. Grubbs Bowling Green State University
Mateusz Gola
Mateusz Gola University of California, San Diego
Steve Martino
Steve Martino Yale University
Crystal L. Park
Crystal L. Park University of Connecticut
Zsolt Demetrovics
Zsolt Demetrovics Flinders University
Carolyn M. Mazure
Carolyn M. Mazure Yale University
Joshua Wilt
Joshua Wilt Case Western Reserve University
Valerie Voon
Valerie Voon University of Cambridge
Beth E. Molnar
Beth E. Molnar Northeastern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens up a variety of online education and career pathways, especially in mental health counseling. Aspiring professionals can benefit from flexible online programs that meet state-specific requirements. For example, if you are interested in learning how to become a mental health counselor in Norfolk or explore options to become a mental health counselor in North Las Vegas, online degrees can be a viable route to earning the qualifications you need.

Each location may have distinct education, certification, and licensure standards. Understanding the Oakland mental health counselor education requirements or the Oklahoma City mental health counselor certification requirements can help guide your decision on the most suitable program for your career goals.

Online psychology degrees offer specialized tracks, preparing graduates for roles such as mental health counselors, marriage and family therapists, or substance abuse counselors. Exploring these interconnected fields can provide diverse and rewarding career opportunities, both in traditional and digital settings.

Best Scientists Citing Shane W. Kraus

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles