World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Siladitya Bhattacharya

Siladitya Bhattacharya

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
88
Citations
28958
World Ranking
13141
National Ranking
1225

Siladitya Bhattacharya publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Siladitya Bhattacharya sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 383 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Siladitya Bhattacharya D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Siladitya Bhattacharya sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Siladitya Bhattacharya is affiliated with the University of Aberdeen in the United Kingdom and has a research focus primarily within the field of medicine. Their work spans several subfields related to reproductive health and pediatrics, including Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health; Reproductive Medicine; Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health; Obstetrics and Gynecology; and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism.

The main topics of Bhattacharya's research encompass Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy, Reproductive Health and Technologies, Ovarian function and disorders, Reproductive Biology and Fertility, Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics, Endometriosis Research and Treatment, and Hormonal and reproductive studies.

Bhattacharya's most frequent publication venues include:

  • Human Reproduction
  • Fertility and Sterility
  • Human Reproduction Open
  • PLoS ONE
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Some recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Bhattacharya are:

  • Evidence-based guideline: unexplained infertility, 2023, Human Reproduction
  • Adverse cardiovascular events and mortality in men during testosterone treatment: an individual patient and aggregate data meta-analysis, 2022, The Lancet Healthy Longevity
  • Number of embryos for transfer following in vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection, 2020, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • Developing a core outcome set for future infertility research: an international consensus development study, 2020, Human Reproduction
  • Top 10 priorities for future infertility research: an international consensus development study, 2020, Human Reproduction

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Bhattacharya include:

  • Abha Maheshwari
  • David J. McLernon
  • Ben W. Mol
  • Rui Wang
  • Edwin Amalraj Raja

Bhattacharya's publication record includes 216 works categorized under Medicine, with particular emphasis on reproductive-related health issues and pediatrics. Overall, their research contributions address various aspects of reproductive biology, infertility, and the outcomes and challenges associated with assisted reproductive technologies.

Best Publications

  • Effect of Body Mass Index on pregnancy outcomes in nulliparous women delivering singleton babies

    Sohinee Bhattacharya;Doris M Campbell;William A Liston;Siladitya Bhattacharya

  • Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles

    Sesh Kamal Sunkara;Vivian Rittenberg;Nick Raine-Fenning;Siladitya Bhattacharya

  • Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Shilpi Pandey;Ashalatha Shetty;Mark Hamilton;Siladitya Bhattacharya

  • Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2004: results generated from European registers by ESHRE

    A. Nyboe Andersen;V. Goossens;A.P. Ferraretti;S. Bhattacharya

  • Effect of overweight and obesity on assisted reproductive technology—a systematic review

    Abha Maheshwari;Lawrize Stofberg;Siladitya Bhattacharya

  • Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Abha Maheshwari;Shilpi Pandey;Ashalatha Shetty;Mark Hamilton

  • Maternal obesity during pregnancy and premature mortality from cardiovascular event in adult offspring: follow-up of 1 323 275 person years

    Rebecca M Reynolds;Keith M Allan;Edwin A Raja;Sohinee Bhattacharya

  • Assisted reproductive technology and intrauterine inseminations in Europe, 2005: results generated from European registers by ESHRE ESHRE. The European IVF Monitoring Programme (EIM), for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)

    A Nyboe Andersen;V Goossens;S Bhattacharya;A P Ferraretti

  • Defining infertility—a systematic review of prevalence studies

    S. Gurunath;Z. Pandian;Richard A. Anderson;Siladitya Bhattacharya

  • Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2006: results generated from European registers by ESHRE

    J. de Mouzon;V. Goossens;S. Bhattacharya;V. Korsak

  • Is frozen embryo transfer better for mothers and babies? Can cumulative meta-analysis provide a definitive answer?

    Abha Maheshwari;Shilpi Pandey;Edwin Amalraj Raja;Ashalatha Shetty

  • Number of embryos for transfer following in vitro fertilisation or intra‐cytoplasmic sperm injection

    Zabeena Pandian;Jane Marjoribanks;Ozkan Ozturk;Gamal Serour

  • Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2009: results generated from European registers by ESHRE

    A.P. Ferraretti;V. Goossens;M. Kupka;S. Bhattacharya

  • Clinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials.

    David J. McLernon;K. Harrild;Christina Bergh;Michael J. Davies

  • Interventions for 'poor responders' to controlled ovarian hyper stimulation (COH) in in-vitro fertilisation (IVF).

    Zabeena Pandian;Alison McTavish;Lorna Sharman Aucott;Mark P.R. Hamilton

  • Polycystic ovary syndrome and the risk of gynaecological cancer: a systematic review

    BG Chittenden;G Fullerton;A Maheshwari;S Bhattacharya

  • Conventional in-vitro fertilisation versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection for the treatment of non-male-factor infertility: a randomised controlled trial.

    Siladitya Bhattacharya;Margaret Hamilton;M. Shaaban;Y. Khalaf

  • Endometrial injury in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques.

    Carolina O Nastri;Sarah F Lensen;Ahmed Gibreel;Nick Raine-Fenning

  • Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2008: results generated from European registers by ESHRE

    A.P. Ferraretti;V. Goossens;J. de Mouzon;S. Bhattacharya

  • Effect of female age on the diagnostic categories of infertility

    Abha Maheshwari;Mark Hamilton;Siladitya Bhattacharya

Frequent Co-Authors

Ben Willem J. Mol
Ben Willem J. Mol Monash University
Khalid S. Khan
Khalid S. Khan University of Granada
Amanda J. Lee
Amanda J. Lee University of Aberdeen
Robert J. Norman
Robert J. Norman University of Adelaide
Edgardo Somigliana
Edgardo Somigliana Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
Mika Gissler
Mika Gissler Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare
Ewout W. Steyerberg
Ewout W. Steyerberg Leiden University Medical Center
Hilary O. D. Critchley
Hilary O. D. Critchley University of Edinburgh
Edwin van Teijlingen
Edwin van Teijlingen Bournemouth University
Vikki Entwistle
Vikki Entwistle University of Aberdeen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related fields and online degrees can open multiple career pathways in healthcare beyond the traditional MD route. Many prospective students consider nursing programs with high acceptance rates for a flexible and in-demand healthcare track, often with less competitive admissions than medical school. For those looking for quicker entry into the workforce, roles in healthcare administration or medical records are also excellent options.

If you’re interested in administrative roles, there are healthcare administration degrees available in accelerated online formats. These programs prepare graduates for leadership positions in hospitals, clinics, and care facilities.

Students seeking alternatives to direct patient care may look at best online medical billing and coding schools. These programs offer the skills needed to manage health data and insurance claims, with many schools providing flexible online study and financial aid options.

Additionally, some nursing tracks now waive entrance testing requirements. Check out nursing schools that don't require teas test for easier admissions and faster starts.

Best Scientists Citing Siladitya Bhattacharya

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles