World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
98
Citations
32782
World Ranking
8966
National Ranking
4614

Stacey A. Missmer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stacey A. Missmer sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 507 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Stacey A. Missmer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stacey A. Missmer sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stacey A. Missmer is affiliated with Michigan State University in the United States. Their research activity is primarily situated within the field of Medicine, with a strong focus on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Other areas of scholarly interest include Immunology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health.

The scientist's research extensively covers topics related to reproductive health and associated conditions. Major thematic areas include:

  • Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Uterine Myomas and Treatments
  • Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
  • Pregnancy-related medical research
  • Ovarian function and disorders
  • Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy

Their publication record features contributions to several prominent journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Fertility and Sterility
  • Human Reproduction
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Frontiers in Reproductive Health

Selected recent papers coauthored or authored by the scientist demonstrate ongoing engagement with key topics in reproductive health:

  • "Endometriosis," 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • "Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of endometriosis," 2022, BMJ
  • "Endometriosis and cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis," 2020, Human Reproduction Update
  • "Epidemiology of Adenomyosis," 2020, Seminars in Reproductive Medicine
  • "Impact of Endometriosis on Life-Course Potential: A Narrative Review," 2021, International Journal of General Medicine

The scientist collaborates frequently with several colleagues who also contribute to the field of reproductive health, including:

  • Kathryn L. Terry
  • Leslie V. Farland
  • Allison F. Vitonis
  • Jorge E. Chavarro
  • Andrew W. Horne

Best Publications

  • Fumonisins Disrupt Sphingolipid Metabolism, Folate Transport, and Neural Tube Development in Embryo Culture and In Vivo: A Potential Risk Factor for Human Neural Tube Defects among Populations Consuming Fumonisin-Contaminated Maize

    Walter F O Marasas;Ronald T. Riley;Katherine A. Hendricks;Victoria L. Stevens

  • Incidence of Laparoscopically Confirmed Endometriosis by Demographic, Anthropometric, and Lifestyle Factors

    Stacey A. Missmer;Susan E. Hankinson;Donna Spiegelman;Robert L. Barbieri

  • The Epidemiology of Endometriosis

    Daniel W. Cramer;Stacey A. Missmer

  • Endogenous Estrogen, Androgen, and Progesterone Concentrations and Breast Cancer Risk Among Postmenopausal Women

    Stacey A. Missmer;A. Heather Eliassen;Robert L. Barbieri;Susan E. Hankinson

  • Risk for and consequences of endometriosis: A critical epidemiologic review.

    AL Shafrir;AL Shafrir;LV Farland;DK Shah;HR Harris

  • Clinical diagnosis of endometriosis: a call to action.

    Sanjay K. Agarwal;Charles Chapron;Linda C. Giudice;Marc R. Laufer

  • Kangaroo Mother Care and Neonatal Outcomes: A Meta-analysis

    Ellen O. Boundy;Roya Dastjerdi;Donna Spiegelman;Wafaie W. Fawzi

  • Exposure to Fumonisins and the Occurrence of Neural Tube Defects along the Texas-Mexico Border

    Stacey Ann Missmer;Lucina Suarez;Marilyn Felkner;Elaine Wang

  • Endogenous Steroid Hormone Concentrations and Risk of Breast Cancer Among Premenopausal Women

    A. Heather Eliassen;Stacey A. Missmer;Shelley S. Tworoger;Donna Spiegelman

  • The epidemiology of endometriosis.

    Stacey A Missmer;Daniel W Cramer

  • Endometriosis: a high-risk population for major chronic diseases?

    Marina Kvaskoff;Fan Mu;Kathryn L. Terry;Holly R. Harris

  • Genome-wide association study identifies a locus at 7p15.2 associated with endometriosis

    Jodie N Painter;Carl A Anderson;Carl A Anderson;Dale R Nyholt;Stuart Macgregor

  • Female obesity adversely affects assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancy and live birth rates

    Barbara Luke;Morton B. Brown;Judy E. Stern;Stacey A. Missmer

  • Genome-wide Association Meta-analysis Identifies New Endometriosis Risk Loci

    Dale R. Nyholt;Siew-Kee Low;Carl A. Anderson;Jodie N. Painter

  • Genome-wide analysis identifies 12 loci influencing human reproductive behavior

    Nicola Barban;Rick Jansen;Ronald De Vlaming;Ahmad Vaez;Ahmad Vaez

  • Meat and dairy food consumption and breast cancer: a pooled analysis of cohort studies

    Stacey A Missmer;Stephanie A Smith-Warner;Donna Spiegelman;Shiaw-Shyuan Yaun

  • Effect of obesity on oocyte and embryo quality in women undergoing in vitro fertilization.

    Divya K. Shah;Stacey A. Missmer;Katharine F. Berry;Catherine Racowsky

  • Meta-analysis identifies five novel loci associated with endometriosis highlighting key genes involved in hormone metabolism

    Yadav Sapkota;Yadav Sapkota;Valgerdur Steinthorsdottir;Andrew P. Morris;Andrew P. Morris;Amelie Fassbender

  • A prospective study of dietary fat consumption and endometriosis risk

    Stacey A. Missmer;Jorge E. Chavarro;Jorge E. Chavarro;Susan Malspeis;Susan Malspeis;Elizabeth R. Bertone-Johnson

  • The search for genes contributing to endometriosis risk

    Grant W. Montgomery;Dale R. Nyholt;Zhen Zhen Zhao;Susan A. Treloar

Frequent Co-Authors

Janet W. Rich-Edwards
Janet W. Rich-Edwards Harvard University
Jorge E. Chavarro
Jorge E. Chavarro Harvard University
Krina T. Zondervan
Krina T. Zondervan University of Oxford
Susan E. Hankinson
Susan E. Hankinson University of Massachusetts Amherst
Daniel W. Cramer
Daniel W. Cramer Brigham and Women's Hospital
Grant W. Montgomery
Grant W. Montgomery University of Queensland
Shelley S. Tworoger
Shelley S. Tworoger Harvard University
Donna Spiegelman
Donna Spiegelman Yale University
Dale R. Nyholt
Dale R. Nyholt Queensland University of Technology
Paige L. Williams
Paige L. Williams Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn't always require the traditional path of medical school. There are several online degree options that can help you advance in the healthcare field or support your transition to medicine-related jobs.

For those interested in healthcare management, consider online mha programs cahme accredited. These programs offer flexibility and a leadership-focused curriculum with reputable accreditation.

Nurses aiming to advance their credentials may find rn to bsn programs without clinicals beneficial, as they allow working RNs to earn a bachelor’s degree without the need for additional onsite clinical work.

If your goal is a high-level nursing degree, options such as shortest dnp programs and online dnp programs without clinicals offer efficient, online pathways for career growth in advanced practice or leadership roles.

These routes open new career pathways in medicine and healthcare, making it easier than ever to learn, upskill, or specialize—no matter your starting point.

Best Scientists Citing Stacey A. Missmer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles