World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 41 7850 7323 112 106 192 7828

Roland Pepermans publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Roland Pepermans between 1970 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Roland Pepermans published across 53 years, from 1970 to 2022, averaging 5.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2005. 3 of the 270 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2005. 1970: 2 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 5 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 14 publications 2000: 17 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 24 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 24 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 1 publication 2022: 2 publications
1970 2022

270 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Roland Pepermans: publications per year, 1970 to 2022
Year Publications
1970 2
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 1
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 1
1984 1
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 1
1997 5
1998 6
1999 14
2000 17
2001 11
2002 5
2003 10
2004 11
2005 24
2006 16
2007 14
2008 24
2009 17
2010 7
2011 14
2012 21
2013 8
2014 11
2015 9
2016 6
2017 4
2018 4
2019 2
2020 1
2021 1
2022 2
Total 270
Download as CSV

Roland Pepermans publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roland Pepermans sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 192 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 192
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Roland Pepermans D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roland Pepermans sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 41
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Roland Pepermans is affiliated with the Vrije Universiteit Brussel in Belgium. Their research primarily focuses on topics that intersect business management, health professions, and organizational behavior. The main fields of study associated with Pepermans are Business, Management and Accounting, and Health Professions, with a particular emphasis on subfields such as Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, and General Health Professions.

Pepermans's work covers various topics, including:

  • Employer Branding and e-HRM
  • Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Occupational Health and Safety Research
  • Workplace Health and Well-being

Their recent publications include the following papers:

  • "Choosing Jobs in the Public, Non-Profit, and For-Profit Sectors: Personal Career Anchors Moderating the Impact of Sector Image and Reputation," published in 2022 in the Review of Public Personnel Administration
  • "Relationship between psychological contract breach and organizational affective and normative commitment: the role of perceived organizational and supervisory support," published in 2020 in Le travail humain

Pepermans frequently collaborates with co-authors such as Mathieu Peiffer, Sabine Pohl, and Françoise Bertrand. Their publications appear in respected venues including Review of Public Personnel Administration and Le travail humain.

The scope of Pepermans's research contributes to understanding workplace dynamics from both managerial and psychological perspectives, addressing how organizational factors influence employee attitudes and behaviors across various sectors. The work draws on interdisciplinary approaches bridging management theory and clinical insights, reflecting their diverse fields of study and topic interests.

Best Publications

  • Exploring four generations' beliefs about career: Is “satisfied” the new “successful”?

    Nicky Dries;Roland Pepermans;Evelien De Kerpel

  • Career success: Constructing a multidimensional model

    Nicky Dries;Roland Pepermans;Olivier Carlier

  • Revisiting the impact of job satisfaction and organizational commitment on nurse turnover intention: an individual differences analysis.

    Sara De Gieter;Joeri Hofmans;Roland Pepermans

  • Principal‐agent relationships on the stewardship‐agency axis

    Ralf Caers;Cindy Du Bois;Marc Jegers;Sara De Gieter

  • The role of perceived organizational justice in shaping the outcomes of talent management: A research agenda

    Jolyn Gelens;Nicky Dries;Joeri Hofmans;Roland Pepermans

  • Person–organization fit: Testing socialization and attraction–selection–attrition hypotheses

    Rein De Cooman;Sara De Gieter;Roland Pepermans;Sabrina Hermans

  • “Real” high‐potential careers: An empirical study into the perspectives of organisations and high potentials

    Nicky Dries;Roland Pepermans

  • Autonomous Motivation Stimulates Volunteers’ Work Effort: A Self-Determination Theory Approach to Volunteerism

    J. Bidee;T. Vantilborgh;R. Pepermans;G. Huybrechts

  • Talent management and organisational justice: employee reactions to high potential identification

    Jolyn Gelens;Jolyn Gelens;Joeri Hofmans;Nicky Dries;Roland Pepermans

  • The role of learning agility and career variety in the identification and development of high potential employees

    Nicky Dries;Tim Vantilborgh;Roland Pepermans

  • A Cross-Sector Comparison of Motivation-Related Concepts in For-Profit and Not-For-Profit Service Organizations

    Rein De Cooman;Sara De Gieter;Roland Pepermans;Marc Jegers

  • Individual differences in the relationship between satisfaction with job rewards and job satisfaction

    Joeri Hofmans;Sara De Gieter;Roland Pepermans

  • How to identify leadership potential: Development and testing of a consensus model

    Nicky Dries;Roland Pepermans

  • How are employees of the nonprofit sector motivated? A research need

    Catherine Schepers;Sara De Gieter;Roland Pepermans;Cindy Du Bois

  • The Career Satisfaction Scale: Response Bias among Men and Women.

    Joeri Hofmans;Nicky Dries;Roland Pepermans

  • Volunteer engagement and intention to quit from a self‐determination theory perspective

    Simona Mihaela Haivas;Joeri Hofmans;Roland Pepermans

  • Using emotional intelligence to identify high potential: a metacompetency perspective

    Nicky Dries;Roland Pepermans

  • Development and Validation of the Work Effort Scale

    Rein De Cooman;Sara De Gieter;Roland Pepermans;Marc Jegers

  • Self-Determination Theory as a Framework for Exploring the Impact of the Organizational Context on Volunteer Motivation A Study of Romanian Volunteers

    Simona Haivas;Joeri Hofmans;Roland Pepermans

  • Effects of ideological and relational psychological contract breach and fulfilment on volunteers’ work effort

    Tim Vantilborgh;Jemima Bidee;Roland Pepermans;Jurgen Willems

Frequent Co-Authors

Marc Jegers
Marc Jegers Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Joeri Hofmans
Joeri Hofmans Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Guy Notelaers
Guy Notelaers University of Bergen
Vincent Yzerbyt
Vincent Yzerbyt Université Catholique de Louvain
Paul Jansen
Paul Jansen Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Filip Boen
Filip Boen KU Leuven
Ann Marie Ryan
Ann Marie Ryan Michigan State University
Hans De Witte
Hans De Witte KU Leuven
Annelies E.M. van Vianen
Annelies E.M. van Vianen University of Amsterdam
Raymond Cluydts
Raymond Cluydts Vrije Universiteit Brussel

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees lets students tap into flexible learning tailored to diverse career goals. Accredited programs cater to both aspiring professionals and seasoned experts seeking career advancement. For instance, New York offers access to top-ranked courses through the best online psychology bachelor's program rankings in New York. Pennsylvania is also home to excellent opportunities, as seen in the best online bachelor's in psychology degree programs ranking in Pennsylvania.

California is a hub for online education, and its online psychology programs in California blend practical skills with research-driven coursework. For those looking to attain the highest qualifications, advanced learners can consult the best online psychology doctorate program rankings in USA.

Whether you aim to become a licensed psychologist, counselor, researcher, or educator, online psychology degrees open doors to a broad range of fulfilling career pathways. Always review program accreditation, faculty expertise, and state licensure requirements to make informed decisions about your future.

Best Scientists Citing Roland Pepermans

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles