World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Annelies E.M. van Vianen

Annelies E.M. van Vianen

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
48
Citations
14810
World Ranking
5812
National Ranking
278

Annelies E.M. van Vianen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Annelies E.M. van Vianen sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 102 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Annelies E.M. van Vianen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Annelies E.M. van Vianen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is she best known for?

The fields of study she is best known for:

  • Social psychology
  • Industrial and organizational psychology
  • Leadership

Social psychology, Organizational culture, Perception, Personality and Career development are her primary areas of study. Her studies link Human resource management with Social psychology. Her Organizational culture study deals with Organizational commitment intersecting with Organizational learning, Person–environment fit, Organisation climate, Socialization and Affective events theory.

Her work in the fields of Social perception overlaps with other areas such as Information exchange. Her Career development research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Quality, Social relation and Identity. Her work on Career counseling as part of general Pedagogy research is frequently linked to Globalization, Narrative therapy and Engineering ethics, thereby connecting diverse disciplines of science.

Her most cited work include:

  • Life designing: A paradigm for career construction in the 21st century (957 citations)
  • Managing relationship conflict and the effectiveness of organizational teams (398 citations)
  • PERSON‐ORGANIZATION FIT: THE MATCH BETWEEN NEWCOMERS' AND RECRUITERS' PREFERENCES FOR ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURES (312 citations)

What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?

Her primary areas of study are Social psychology, Perception, Career development, Personality and Applied psychology. Her Social psychology study frequently links to adjacent areas such as Organizational culture. Perception is closely attributed to Organisation climate in her study.

Annelies E.M. van Vianen works mostly in the field of Career development, limiting it down to topics relating to Vocational education and, in certain cases, Medical education, as a part of the same area of interest. Her Personality research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Narcissism and Core self-evaluations. Annelies E.M. van Vianen undertakes interdisciplinary study in the fields of Applied psychology and Coaching through her works.

She most often published in these fields:

  • Social psychology (60.00%)
  • Perception (13.33%)
  • Career development (13.33%)

What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2015-2021)?

  • Social psychology (60.00%)
  • Affect (6.67%)
  • Seekers (5.56%)

In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:

Her primary scientific interests are in Social psychology, Affect, Seekers, Coaching and Perception. Social psychology is a component of her Job attitude and Job satisfaction studies. The Job attitude study combines topics in areas such as Job analysis, Employee motivation and Job design.

Her Affect research integrates issues from Conceptual model and Injustice. Her studies in Perception integrate themes in fields like Quality and Employability. She combines subjects such as Self-criticism, Mindset and Intervention studies with her study of Self-compassion.

Between 2015 and 2021, her most popular works were:

  • Motivational power of future time perspective: Meta-analyses in education, work, and health. (32 citations)
  • Narcissistic leaders: An asset or a liability? Leader visibility, follower responses, and group-level absenteeism. (21 citations)
  • How experienced autonomy can improve job seekers' motivation, job search, and chance of finding reemployment (21 citations)

In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Social psychology
  • Industrial and organizational psychology
  • Leadership

Her primary areas of investigation include Job satisfaction, Social psychology, Applied psychology, Affect and Job attitude. Her research on Job satisfaction often connects related topics like Vocational education. Annelies E.M. van Vianen conducts interdisciplinary study in the fields of Social psychology and Power through her works.

Her Applied psychology study incorporates themes from Construct and Conceptual model. Her research combines Developmental psychology and Affect. Her study in Job attitude is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Employee motivation and Job design.

Best Publications

  • Life designing: A paradigm for career construction in the 21st century

    Mark L. Savickas;Laura Nota;Jerome Rossier;Jean-Pierre Dauwalder

  • Managing relationship conflict and the effectiveness of organizational teams

    Carsten K.W. De Dreu;Annelies E.M. Van Vianen

  • PERSON‐ORGANIZATION FIT: THE MATCH BETWEEN NEWCOMERS' AND RECRUITERS' PREFERENCES FOR ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURES

    Annelies E.M. Van Vianen

  • Training career adaptability to facilitate a successful school-to-work transition

    Jessie Koen;Ute-Christine Klehe;Annelies E.M. Van Vianen

  • Gender and culture differences in emotion

    Agneta H. Fischer;Patricia M. Rodriguez Mosquera;Annelies E. M. van Vianen;Antony S. R. Manstead

  • Person–Environment Fit: A Review of Its Basic Tenets

    A.E.M. van Vianen

  • Understanding the factors that promote employability orientation: The impact of employability culture, career satisfaction, and role breadth self-efficacy

    Aukje Nauta;Annelies van Vianen;Beatrice van der Heijden;Karen van Dam

  • Illuminating the glass ceiling: The role of organizational culture preferences

    Annelies E. M. Van Vianen;Agneta H. Fischer

  • Job-search strategies and reemployment quality: the impact of career adaptability

    Jessie Koen;Ute-Christine Klehe;Annelies E.M. Van Vianen;Jelena Zikic

  • Personality in teams: Its relationship to social cohesion, task cohesion, and team performance

    Annelies E.M. van Vianen;Carsten K.W. De Dreu

  • CHANGES IN PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT: THE IMPACT OF SOCIALIZATION TACTICS ON PERCEIVED AND ACTUAL P-O FIT

    Helena D Cooper-Thomas;Annelies van Vianen;Neil Anderson

  • Fitting in: Surface- and Deep-Level Cultural Differences and Expatriates’ Adjustment

    Annelies E. M. Van Vianen;Irene E. De Pater;Amy L. Kristof-Brown;Erin C. Johnson

  • All I need is a stage to shine: Narcissists' leader emergence and performance

    Barbora Nevicka;Annebel H.B. De Hoogh;Annelies E.M. Van Vianen;Bianca Beersma

  • Person-organization and person-supervisor fits: Employee commitments in a Chinese context

    Annelies E.M. Van Vianen;Chi Tai Shen;Aichia Chuang

  • Expatriate Social Ties: Personality Antecedents and Consequences for Adjustment

    Erin C. Johnson;Amy L. Kristof-brown;Annelies E.M. Van vianen;Irene E. De pater

  • Career Adapt-Abilities Scale--Netherlands Form: Psychometric Properties and Relationships to Ability, Personality, and Regulatory Focus.

    Annelies E.M. van Vianen;Ute-Christine Klehe;Jessie Koen;Nicky Dries

  • Reality at Odds With Perceptions Narcissistic Leaders and Group Performance

    Barbora Nevicka;Femke S. Ten Velden;Annebel H. B. De Hoogh;Annelies E. M. Van Vianen

  • EMPLOYEES' CHALLENGING JOB EXPERIENCES AND SUPERVISORS' EVALUATIONS OF PROMOTABILITY

    Irene E. De Pater;Annelies E. M. Van Vianen;Myriam N. Bechtoldt;Ute-Christine Klehe

  • Career adaptability, turnover and loyalty during organizational downsizing☆

    Ute-Christine Klehe;Jelena Zikic;Annelies E.M. Van Vianen;Irene E. De Pater

  • Employability among the long-term unemployed: A futile quest or worth the effort?

    Jessie Koen;Ute-Christine Klehe;Annelies E.M. Van Vianen

Frequent Co-Authors

Ute-Christine Klehe
Ute-Christine Klehe University of Giessen
Jos A. Bosch
Jos A. Bosch University of Amsterdam
Laura Nota
Laura Nota University of Padua
Jérôme Rossier
Jérôme Rossier University of Lausanne
Edwin A. J. van Hooft
Edwin A. J. van Hooft University of Amsterdam
Mark L. Savickas
Mark L. Savickas Northeast Ohio Medical University
Agneta H. Fischer
Agneta H. Fischer University of Amsterdam
Bernard A. Nijstad
Bernard A. Nijstad University of Groningen
Carsten K. W. De Dreu
Carsten K. W. De Dreu University of Groningen
Amy L. Kristof-Brown
Amy L. Kristof-Brown University of Iowa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a range of rewarding online degrees and professional pathways, especially in mental health counseling. Many accredited universities now offer online programs that prepare students for licensure and advanced roles, making it easier to balance education with other commitments.

If your goal is to become a mental health counselor in Madison, understanding state-specific licensing processes is essential. Each city and state has their own requirements. For instance, the Memphis mental health counselor certification requirements detail the mandatory clinical hours and examinations.

Similarly, if you are interested in working in Arizona, the Mesa mental health counselor certification requirements explain the credentials you’ll need. Florida residents can refer to the mental health counselor requirements in Miami for local regulations.

Whether you plan to practice locally or pursue national opportunities, researching these key credentials will help guide your educational journey and career planning.

Best Scientists Citing Annelies E.M. van Vianen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles