World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
David R. M. Pattison

David R. M. Pattison

David R. M. Pattison publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David R. M. Pattison sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

David R. M. Pattison D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David R. M. Pattison sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

David R. M. Pattison is affiliated with the University of Calgary in Canada and specializes in Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a significant focus on Geophysics and Geochemistry and Petrology within this field. Their research spans various subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Earth-Surface Processes, and Paleontology.

The scientist's work frequently explores topics such as:

  • Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
  • Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • High-pressure geophysics and materials
  • Mineralogy and Gemology Studies
  • Geological formations and processes
  • Earthquake and tectonic studies
  • Evolution and Paleontology Studies

Pattison has contributed papers to a range of publication venues, notably:

  • Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
  • Geology
  • Journal of Petrology
  • Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America
  • Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology

Several key recent publications include:

  • "Ferrous/ferric (Fe2+/Fe3+) partitioning among silicates in metapelites," 2021, Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology
  • "Major-element geochemistry of pelites," 2022, Geology
  • "Metamorphism of the Buchan type-area, NE Scotland and its relation to the adjacent Barrovian domain," 2021, Journal of the Geological Society
  • "Nailed to the craton: Stratigraphic continuity across the southeastern Canadian Cordillera with tectonic implications for ribbon continent models," 2020, Geology
  • "Bulk Compositional Influence on Diverse Metapelitic Mineral Assemblages in the Whetstone Lake Area, Ontario," 2023, Journal of Petrology

The scientist collaborates frequently, working most often with Jacob B. Forshaw, with whom they share multiple publications. Other notable co-authors include P S Simony, Douglas R. MacLeod, Shantal A. Goldsmith, and Alexandra B. Nagurney.

Best Publications

  • Temperatures of Granulite-facies Metamorphism: Constraints from Experimental Phase Equilibria and Thermobarometry Corrected for Retrograde Exchange

    David R. M. Pattison;Thomas Chacko;James Farquhar;Christopher R. M. McFARLANE

  • Stability of Andalusite and Sillimanite and the Al2SiO5 Triple Point: Constraints from the Ballachulish Aureole, Scotland

    Unknown

  • Reversed experimental calibration of the garnet-clinopyroxene Fe — Mg exchange thermometer

    D. R. M. Pattison;R. C. Newton

  • Phase equilibria and thermobarometry of metapelites

    David R. M. Pattison;Robert J. Tracy

  • Petrogenetic significance of orthopyroxene-free garnet+clinopyroxene+plagioclase±quartz-bearing metabasites with respect to the amphibolite and granulite facies

    D. R. M. Pattison

  • Reassessment of the garnet-clinopyroxene Fe-Mg exchange thermometer: II. Thermodynamic analysis

    R. G. Berman;L. Ya Aranovich;D. R. M. Pattison

  • On the Initiation of Metamorphic Sulfide Anatexis

    Andrew G. Tomkins;Andrew G. Tomkins;David R. M. Pattison;B. Ronald Frost

  • The Hemlo Gold Deposit, Ontario: An Example of Melting and Mobilization of a Precious Metal-Sulfosalt Assemblage during Amphibolite Facies Metamorphism and Deformation

    Andrew G. Tomkins;David R. M. Pattison;Eva Zaleski

  • Zoning patterns in orthopyroxene and garnet in granulites: implications for geothermometry

    D. R. M. Pattison;N. J. Bégin

  • Interplay between equilibrium and kinetics in prograde metamorphism of pelites: an example from the Nelson aureole, British Columbia

    D. R. M. Pattison;D. K. Tinkham

  • Petrological consequences of variations in metamorphic reaction affinity

    D.R.M. Pattison;C. de Capitani;Fred Gaidies;Fred Gaidies

  • Genesis of the Kapuskasing (Ontario) migmatitic mafic granulites by dehydration melting of amphibolite: the importance of quartz to reaction progress

    T. H. D. Hartel;D. R. M. Pattison

  • Genesis of monazite and Y zoning in garnet from the Black Hills, South Dakota

    Panseok Yang;David Pattison

  • Thermodynamic modelling of the reaction muscovite+cordierite→Al2SiO5+biotite+quartz+ H2O: constraints from natural assemblages and implications for the metapelitic petrogenetic grid

    D. R. M. Pattison;F. S. Spear;C. L. Debuhr;J. T. Cheney

  • Evolution of structurally contrasting anatectic migmatites in the 3‐kbar Ballachulish aureole, Scotland

    D.R.M. Pattison;B. Harte

  • Instability of Al2SiO5 “triple-point” assemblages in muscovite+biotite+quartz-bearing metapelites, with implications

    David R.M. Pattison

  • Accessory phase petrogenesis in relation to major phase assemblages in pelites from the Nelson contact aureole, southern British Columbia

    H. S. Tomkins;D. R. M. Pattison

  • The implications of overstepping for metamorphic assemblage diagrams (MADs)

    Frank S. Spear;David R.M. Pattison

  • Toward a quantitative model of metamorphic nucleation and growth

    F. Gaidies;D. R. M. Pattison;C. de Capitani

  • CONTRASTING SEQUENCES OF METAPELITIC MINERAL-ASSEMBLAGES IN THE AUREOLE OF THE TILTED NELSON BATHOLITH, BRITISH COLUMBIA: IMPLICATIONS FOR PHASE EQUILIBRIA AND PRESSURE DETERMINATION IN ANDALUSITE–SILLIMANITE-TYPE SETTINGS

    David R.M. Pattison;James J. Vogl

  • A comparison of observed and thermodynamically predicted phase equilibria and mineral compositions in mafic granulites

    Jacob B. Forshaw;David J. Waters;David R. M. Pattison;Richard M. Palin

  • ARSENOPYRITE MELTING DURING METAMORPHISM OF SULFIDE ORE DEPOSITS

    Andrew G. Tomkins;B. Ronald Frost;David R.M. Pattison

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank S. Spear
Frank S. Spear Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Ben Harte
Ben Harte University of Edinburgh
Andrew George Tomkins
Andrew George Tomkins Monash University
David J. Waters
David J. Waters University of Oxford
Richard M. Palin
Richard M. Palin University of Oxford
Edward D. Ghent
Edward D. Ghent University of Calgary
David R. Lentz
David R. Lentz University of New Brunswick
William D. Carlson
William D. Carlson The University of Texas at Austin
Robert C. Newton
Robert C. Newton University of California, Los Angeles
Marc Jolivet
Marc Jolivet University of Rennes

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can enhance your career options in Earth Science and related fields. For those interested in broadening their creative and analytical skills, pursuing an online mfa program may offer a unique blend of scientific insight and artistic expression.

Additionally, professionals looking to combine leadership with environmental knowledge might consider an online masters degree in human resource management. This path supports career growth in organizations focused on sustainability and resource management.

Many Earth Science students and professionals are also older adults seeking flexible education options. Programs designed for individuals in this group, such as those highlighted in degrees for older adults, provide tailored learning environments and accommodate diverse life schedules.

For those interested in the intersection of environmental information and data management, pursuing online mlis programs accredited ala can lead to careers in library science with a focus on geosciences and research support.

Best Scientists Citing David R. M. Pattison

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles