What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Mineral
- Igneous rock
- Metamorphic rock
David R.M. Pattison mainly investigates Geochemistry, Granulite, Metamorphism, Mineral and Metamorphic facies.
His is doing research in Partial melting, Andalusite, Protolith and Migmatite, both of which are found in Geochemistry.
His study in Partial melting is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Arsenopyrite and Greenschist.
His research in Andalusite intersects with topics in Staurolite and Sillimanite.
His study connects Nucleation and Metamorphism.
David R.M. Pattison interconnects Mineralogy and Petrology in the investigation of issues within Mineral.
His most cited work include:
- Temperatures of Granulite-facies Metamorphism: Constraints from Experimental Phase Equilibria and Thermobarometry Corrected for Retrograde Exchange (270 citations)
- Reversed experimental calibration of the garnet-clinopyroxene Fe — Mg exchange thermometer (152 citations)
- Phase equilibria and thermobarometry of metapelites (145 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
David R.M. Pattison mainly focuses on Geochemistry, Metamorphism, Metamorphic rock, Granulite and Biotite.
His work on Staurolite as part of general Geochemistry research is often related to Metamorphic facies, thus linking different fields of science.
His work on Protolith as part of general Metamorphism study is frequently connected to Kinetics, therefore bridging the gap between diverse disciplines of science and establishing a new relationship between them.
His Metamorphic rock research integrates issues from Muscovite and Mineralogy.
His research investigates the connection between Mineral and topics such as Partial melting that intersect with issues in Petrography.
His Sillimanite research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Andalusite and Proterozoic.
He most often published in these fields:
- Geochemistry (73.33%)
- Metamorphism (40.95%)
- Metamorphic rock (36.19%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?
- Geochemistry (73.33%)
- Metamorphism (40.95%)
- Metamorphic rock (36.19%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Geochemistry, Metamorphism, Metamorphic rock, Mineral and Pelite are his primary areas of study.
With his scientific publications, his incorporates both Geochemistry and Metamorphic facies.
His Metamorphism study incorporates themes from Foreland basin and Magmatism.
As part of one scientific family, David R.M. Pattison deals mainly with the area of Metamorphic rock, narrowing it down to issues related to the Nucleation, and often Kyanite and Staurolite.
His Pelite research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Migmatite and Crystallization.
He works mostly in the field of Monazite, limiting it down to topics relating to Fission track dating and, in certain cases, Muscovite.
Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- The implications of overstepping for metamorphic assemblage diagrams (MADs) (43 citations)
- A comparison of observed and thermodynamically predicted phase equilibria and mineral compositions in mafic granulites (37 citations)
- Kinetic control of staurolite–Al2SiO5 mineral assemblages: Implications for Barrovian and Buchan metamorphism (13 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Mineral
- Igneous rock
- Metamorphic rock
David R.M. Pattison spends much of his time researching Geochemistry, Mineral, Staurolite, Metamorphism and Raman spectroscopy.
His work carried out in the field of Geochemistry brings together such families of science as Crystallization and Prehnite.
His study deals with a combination of Mineral and Granulite.
In the field of Metamorphic rock and Kyanite David R.M. Pattison studies Staurolite.
His Metamorphism study deals with the bigger picture of Petrology.
His Raman spectroscopy study frequently draws connections between adjacent fields such as Recrystallization.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
