World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ute-Christine Klehe

Ute-Christine Klehe

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 32 10811 10122 525 517 89 5411

Ute-Christine Klehe publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ute-Christine Klehe between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ute-Christine Klehe published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 5.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2012. 12 of the 114 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2012. 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 8 publications
2004 2025

114 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ute-Christine Klehe: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 3
2005 2
2006 4
2007 8
2008 6
2009 3
2010 3
2011 4
2012 11
2013 4
2014 7
2015 5
2016 4
2017 3
2018 8
2019 8
2020 4
2021 6
2022 4
2023 5
2024 4
2025 8
Total 114
Download as CSV

Ute-Christine Klehe publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ute-Christine Klehe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 89 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 89
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Ute-Christine Klehe D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ute-Christine Klehe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 32
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ute-Christine Klehe is affiliated with the University of Giessen in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on social sciences with specific work in subfields such as sociology and political science, general health professions, safety research, social psychology, and demography.

The scientist's work spans several topics including career development and diversity, retirement, disability, and employment, employment and welfare studies, job satisfaction and organizational behavior, higher education and employability, grit, self-efficacy and motivation, and aging and gerontology research.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Ute-Christine Klehe include:

  • Going full circle: Integrating research on career adaptation and proactivity, 2021, Journal of Vocational Behavior
  • Facilitating a successful school-to-work transition: Comparing compact career-adaptation interventions, 2021, Journal of Vocational Behavior
  • A latent transition analysis examining the nature of and movement between career adaptability profiles, 2022, Journal of Vocational Behavior
  • Withdrawing from job search: The effect of age discrimination on occupational future time perspective, career exploration, and retirement intentions, 2023, Acta Psychologica
  • Predicting the self-regulated job search of mature-aged job seekers: The use of elective selection, loss-based selection, optimization, and compensation strategies, 2021, Journal of Vocational Behavior

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Ulrike Fasbender
  • Katja Wehrle
  • Mari Kira
  • Jelena Zikic
  • Gloria Willhardt

Publication venues where Ute-Christine Klehe has frequently contributed include:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Vocational Behavior
  • Journal of Business and Psychology
  • Acta Psychologica
  • Journal of Organizational Behavior

Best Publications

  • Training career adaptability to facilitate a successful school-to-work transition

    Jessie Koen;Ute-Christine Klehe;Annelies E.M. Van Vianen

  • Job Loss as a Blessing in Disguise: The Role of Career Exploration and Career Planning in Predicting Reemployment Quality.

    Jelena Zikic;Ute-Christine Klehe

  • Job-search strategies and reemployment quality: the impact of career adaptability

    Jessie Koen;Ute-Christine Klehe;Annelies E.M. Van Vianen;Jelena Zikic

  • Career Adapt-Abilities Scale--Netherlands Form: Psychometric Properties and Relationships to Ability, Personality, and Regulatory Focus.

    Annelies E.M. van Vianen;Ute-Christine Klehe;Jessie Koen;Nicky Dries

  • EMPLOYEES' CHALLENGING JOB EXPERIENCES AND SUPERVISORS' EVALUATIONS OF PROMOTABILITY

    Irene E. De Pater;Annelies E. M. Van Vianen;Myriam N. Bechtoldt;Ute-Christine Klehe

  • Career adaptability, turnover and loyalty during organizational downsizing☆

    Ute-Christine Klehe;Jelena Zikic;Annelies E.M. Van Vianen;Irene E. De Pater

  • Reasons for Being Selective When Choosing Personnel Selection Procedures

    Cornelius J. König;Ute-Christine Klehe;Matthias Berchtold;Martin Kleinmann

  • Employability among the long-term unemployed: A futile quest or worth the effort?

    Jessie Koen;Ute-Christine Klehe;Annelies E.M. Van Vianen

  • Working hard and working smart: motivation and ability during typical and maximum performance.

    Ute-Christine Klehe;Neil Anderson

  • Choosing How to Choose: Institutional Pressures Affecting the Adoption of Personnel Selection Procedures

    Ute-Christine Klehe

  • Can I come as I am? Refugees' vocational identity threats, coping, and growth

    Katja Wehrle;Ute Christine Klehe;Mari Kira;Jelena Zikic

  • The Impact of Job Complexity and Study Design on Situational and Behavior Description Interview Validity

    Allen I. Huffcutt;James M. Conway;Philip L. Roth;Ute-Christine Klehe

  • Transparency in Structured Interviews: Consequences for Construct and Criterion-Related Validity

    Ute-Christine Klehe;Cornelius J. König;Gerald M. Richter;Martin Kleinmann

  • Candidates' Ability to Identify Criteria in Nontransparent Selection Procedures: Evidence from an assessment center and a structured interview

    Cornelius J. König;Klaus G. Melchers;Martin Kleinmann;Gerald M. Richter

  • Coping Proactively with Economic Stress: Career Adaptability in the Face of Job Insecurity, Job Loss, Unemployment, and Underemployment

    Ute-Christine Klehe;Jelena Zikic;Annelies E.M. van Vianen;Jessie Koen

  • Is the future still open? The mediating role of occupational future time perspective in the effects of career adaptability and aging experience on late career planning

    Ulrike Fasbender;Anne M. Wöhrmann;Mo Wang;Ute Christine Klehe

  • Responding to Personality Tests in a Selection Context: The Role of the Ability to Identify Criteria and the Ideal-Employee Factor

    Ute-Christine Klehe;Martin Kleinmann;Thomas Hartstein;Klaus G. Melchers

  • What Would You Do—Really or Ideally? Constructs Underlying the Behavior Description Interview and the Situational Interview in Predicting Typical Versus Maximum Performance

    Ute-Christine Klehe;Gary Latham

  • The moderating influence of personality and culture on social loafing in typical versus maximum performance situations

    Ute-Christine Klehe;Neil Anderson

  • Putting career construction into context: Career adaptability among refugees

    Katja Wehrle;Mari Kira;Ute-Christine Klehe

  • Differentiating cognitive and affective job insecurity: Antecedents and outcomes

    Ute‐christine Klehe;Annelies E.M. Vianen;Jelena Zikic

Frequent Co-Authors

Annelies E.M. van Vianen
Annelies E.M. van Vianen University of Amsterdam
Martin Kleinmann
Martin Kleinmann University of Zurich
Cornelius J. König
Cornelius J. König Saarland University
Neil Anderson
Neil Anderson University of Bradford
Gary P. Latham
Gary P. Latham University of Toronto
Edwin A. J. van Hooft
Edwin A. J. van Hooft University of Amsterdam
Filip Lievens
Filip Lievens Singapore Management University
Mo Wang
Mo Wang University of Florida
Beatrice van der Heijden
Beatrice van der Heijden Radboud University
Michael Frese
Michael Frese Asia School of Business

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in the USA opens diverse pathways, from clinical practice to counseling, human resources, and more. While traditional campus study remains popular, online programs offer flexibility and accessibility for students nationwide.

Choosing the right program is essential, with factors like accreditation, cost, and career outcomes making a significant impact. For those seeking value, some top online programs have been recognized for their overall return on investment and career prospects. For instance, you can explore the best value psychology programs in Hawaii, which balance affordability with strong academic reputations.

In other regions, the best value psychology programs in Jacksonville and the best value psychology programs in New Jersey are well-regarded for preparing graduates for in-demand roles in various psychological and counseling settings.

If you are interested in the northeastern US, the most valuable psychology programs in New York offer access to vibrant career opportunities and robust professional networks.

No matter which state or program you choose, studying psychology online can be a stepping stone to meaningful careers in mental health, education, research, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Ute-Christine Klehe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles