World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ute-Christine Klehe

Ute-Christine Klehe

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
5411
World Ranking
10811
National Ranking
525

Ute-Christine Klehe publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ute-Christine Klehe sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 89 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ute-Christine Klehe D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ute-Christine Klehe sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ute-Christine Klehe is affiliated with the University of Giessen in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on social sciences with specific work in subfields such as sociology and political science, general health professions, safety research, social psychology, and demography.

The scientist's work spans several topics including career development and diversity, retirement, disability, and employment, employment and welfare studies, job satisfaction and organizational behavior, higher education and employability, grit, self-efficacy and motivation, and aging and gerontology research.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Ute-Christine Klehe include:

  • Going full circle: Integrating research on career adaptation and proactivity, 2021, Journal of Vocational Behavior
  • Facilitating a successful school-to-work transition: Comparing compact career-adaptation interventions, 2021, Journal of Vocational Behavior
  • A latent transition analysis examining the nature of and movement between career adaptability profiles, 2022, Journal of Vocational Behavior
  • Withdrawing from job search: The effect of age discrimination on occupational future time perspective, career exploration, and retirement intentions, 2023, Acta Psychologica
  • Predicting the self-regulated job search of mature-aged job seekers: The use of elective selection, loss-based selection, optimization, and compensation strategies, 2021, Journal of Vocational Behavior

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Ulrike Fasbender
  • Katja Wehrle
  • Mari Kira
  • Jelena Zikic
  • Gloria Willhardt

Publication venues where Ute-Christine Klehe has frequently contributed include:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Vocational Behavior
  • Journal of Business and Psychology
  • Acta Psychologica
  • Journal of Organizational Behavior

Best Publications

  • Training career adaptability to facilitate a successful school-to-work transition

    Jessie Koen;Ute-Christine Klehe;Annelies E.M. Van Vianen

  • Job Loss as a Blessing in Disguise: The Role of Career Exploration and Career Planning in Predicting Reemployment Quality.

    Jelena Zikic;Ute-Christine Klehe

  • Job-search strategies and reemployment quality: the impact of career adaptability

    Jessie Koen;Ute-Christine Klehe;Annelies E.M. Van Vianen;Jelena Zikic

  • Career Adapt-Abilities Scale--Netherlands Form: Psychometric Properties and Relationships to Ability, Personality, and Regulatory Focus.

    Annelies E.M. van Vianen;Ute-Christine Klehe;Jessie Koen;Nicky Dries

  • EMPLOYEES' CHALLENGING JOB EXPERIENCES AND SUPERVISORS' EVALUATIONS OF PROMOTABILITY

    Irene E. De Pater;Annelies E. M. Van Vianen;Myriam N. Bechtoldt;Ute-Christine Klehe

  • Career adaptability, turnover and loyalty during organizational downsizing☆

    Ute-Christine Klehe;Jelena Zikic;Annelies E.M. Van Vianen;Irene E. De Pater

  • Reasons for Being Selective When Choosing Personnel Selection Procedures

    Cornelius J. König;Ute-Christine Klehe;Matthias Berchtold;Martin Kleinmann

  • Employability among the long-term unemployed: A futile quest or worth the effort?

    Jessie Koen;Ute-Christine Klehe;Annelies E.M. Van Vianen

  • Working hard and working smart: motivation and ability during typical and maximum performance.

    Ute-Christine Klehe;Neil Anderson

  • Choosing How to Choose: Institutional Pressures Affecting the Adoption of Personnel Selection Procedures

    Ute-Christine Klehe

  • Can I come as I am? Refugees' vocational identity threats, coping, and growth

    Katja Wehrle;Ute Christine Klehe;Mari Kira;Jelena Zikic

  • The Impact of Job Complexity and Study Design on Situational and Behavior Description Interview Validity

    Allen I. Huffcutt;James M. Conway;Philip L. Roth;Ute-Christine Klehe

  • Transparency in Structured Interviews: Consequences for Construct and Criterion-Related Validity

    Ute-Christine Klehe;Cornelius J. König;Gerald M. Richter;Martin Kleinmann

  • Candidates' Ability to Identify Criteria in Nontransparent Selection Procedures: Evidence from an assessment center and a structured interview

    Cornelius J. König;Klaus G. Melchers;Martin Kleinmann;Gerald M. Richter

  • Coping Proactively with Economic Stress: Career Adaptability in the Face of Job Insecurity, Job Loss, Unemployment, and Underemployment

    Ute-Christine Klehe;Jelena Zikic;Annelies E.M. van Vianen;Jessie Koen

  • Is the future still open? The mediating role of occupational future time perspective in the effects of career adaptability and aging experience on late career planning

    Ulrike Fasbender;Anne M. Wöhrmann;Mo Wang;Ute Christine Klehe

  • Responding to Personality Tests in a Selection Context: The Role of the Ability to Identify Criteria and the Ideal-Employee Factor

    Ute-Christine Klehe;Martin Kleinmann;Thomas Hartstein;Klaus G. Melchers

  • What Would You Do—Really or Ideally? Constructs Underlying the Behavior Description Interview and the Situational Interview in Predicting Typical Versus Maximum Performance

    Ute-Christine Klehe;Gary Latham

  • The moderating influence of personality and culture on social loafing in typical versus maximum performance situations

    Ute-Christine Klehe;Neil Anderson

  • Putting career construction into context: Career adaptability among refugees

    Katja Wehrle;Mari Kira;Ute-Christine Klehe

  • Differentiating cognitive and affective job insecurity: Antecedents and outcomes

    Ute‐christine Klehe;Annelies E.M. Vianen;Jelena Zikic

Frequent Co-Authors

Annelies E.M. van Vianen
Annelies E.M. van Vianen University of Amsterdam
Martin Kleinmann
Martin Kleinmann University of Zurich
Cornelius J. König
Cornelius J. König Saarland University
Neil Anderson
Neil Anderson University of Bradford
Gary P. Latham
Gary P. Latham University of Toronto
Edwin A. J. van Hooft
Edwin A. J. van Hooft University of Amsterdam
Filip Lievens
Filip Lievens Singapore Management University
Mo Wang
Mo Wang University of Florida
Beatrice van der Heijden
Beatrice van der Heijden Radboud University
Michael Frese
Michael Frese Asia School of Business

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in the USA opens diverse pathways, from clinical practice to counseling, human resources, and more. While traditional campus study remains popular, online programs offer flexibility and accessibility for students nationwide.

Choosing the right program is essential, with factors like accreditation, cost, and career outcomes making a significant impact. For those seeking value, some top online programs have been recognized for their overall return on investment and career prospects. For instance, you can explore the best value psychology programs in Hawaii, which balance affordability with strong academic reputations.

In other regions, the best value psychology programs in Jacksonville and the best value psychology programs in New Jersey are well-regarded for preparing graduates for in-demand roles in various psychological and counseling settings.

If you are interested in the northeastern US, the most valuable psychology programs in New York offer access to vibrant career opportunities and robust professional networks.

No matter which state or program you choose, studying psychology online can be a stepping stone to meaningful careers in mental health, education, research, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Ute-Christine Klehe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles