World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
21909
World Ranking
7684
National Ranking
4112

Connie R. Wanberg publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Connie R. Wanberg sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 70 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Connie R. Wanberg D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Connie R. Wanberg sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management

Overview

Connie R. Wanberg is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within psychology and social sciences, with a focus on various aspects of workplace behavior, mental health, and socioeconomic factors.

Their recent published works include:

  • COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. (2020), American Psychologist
  • Socioeconomic status and well-being during COVID-19: A resource-based examination. (2020), Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Job search and employment success: A quantitative review and future research agenda. (2020), Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Different starting lines, different finish times: The role of social class in the job search process. (2021), Journal of Applied Psychology
  • After the break-up: How divorcing affects individuals at work. (2022), Personnel Psychology

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Borbala Csillag
  • Le Zhou
  • Edwin A. J. van Hooft
  • Gökçe Başbuğ
  • Philip S. DeOrtentiis

Wanberg has published regularly in the following venues:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Personnel Psychology
  • American Psychologist
  • Journal of Management

The main fields of study associated with Wanberg's research are:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

Within these fields, their subfields of study include:

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Key topics in Wanberg's work are:

  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
  • Health disparities and outcomes

Among the recognitions in their career, Wanberg has been named a Dean of Fellow by the Academy of Management.

Best Publications

  • Psychological and physical well-being during unemployment: a meta-analytic study.

    Frances M. McKee-Ryan;Zhaoli Song;Connie R. Wanberg;Angelo J. Kinicki

  • Predictors and outcomes of openness to changes in a reorganizing workplace.

    Connie R. Wanberg;Joseph T. Banas

  • Job search and employment: A personality–motivational analysis and meta-analytic review.

    Ruth Kanfer;Connie R. Wanberg;Tracy M. Kantrowitz

  • COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action.

    Kevin M. Kniffin;Jayanth Narayanan;Frederik Anseel;John Antonakis

  • E-learning: emerging uses, empirical results and future directions

    Elizabeth T. Welsh;Connie R. Wanberg;Kenneth G. Brown;Marcia J. Simmering

  • Unwrapping the organizational entry process: disentangling multiple antecedents and their pathways to adjustment.

    John D. Kammeyer-Mueller;Connie R. Wanberg

  • Mentoring research: A review and dynamic process model.

    Connie R Wanberg;Elizabeth T Welsh;Sarah A Hezlett

  • The Individual Experience of Unemployment

    Connie R. Wanberg

  • Predictors and outcomes of proactivity in the socialization process.

    Connie R. Wanberg;John D. Kammeyer-Mueller

  • Predictors and outcomes of networking intensity among unemployed job seekers.

    Connie R. Wanberg;Ruth Kanfer;Joseph T. Banas

  • Unemployed individuals: motives, job-search competencies, and job-search constraints as predictors of job seeking and reemployment.

    Connie R. Wanberg;Ruth Kanfer;Maria Rotundo

  • Job-Search Persistence During Unemployment: A 10-Wave Longitudinal Study

    Connie R. Wanberg;Theresa M. Glomb;Zhaoli Song;Sarah Sorenson

  • Support, undermining, and newcomer socialization: : fitting in during the first 90 days.

    John D Kammeyer-Mueller;Connie R Wanberg;Alex Rubenstein;Zhaoli Song

  • Individuals without jobs: An empirical study of job-seeking behavior and reemployment

    Connie R. Wanberg;John D. Watt;Deborah J. Rumsey

  • Mentor and protégé predictors and outcomes of mentoring in a formal mentoring program

    Connie R. Wanberg;John Kammeyer-Mueller;Marc Marchese

  • Antecedents and outcomes of coping behaviors among unemployed and reemployed individuals

    Connie R. Wanberg

  • The job-search grind: perceived progress, self-reactions, and self-regulation of search effort

    Connie R. Wanberg;Jing Zhu;Edwin A. J. van Hooft

  • Predictive validity of a multidisciplinary model of reemployment success.

    Connie R. Wanberg;Leaetta M. Hough;Zhaoli Song

  • The role of temporal shifts in turnover processes: it's about time.

    John D. Kammeyer-Mueller;Connie R. Wanberg;Theresa M. Glomb;Dennis Ahlburg

  • The Oxford handbook of organizational socialization

    Connie R. Wanberg

  • Age and reemployment success after job loss: An integrative model and meta-analysis.

    Connie R. Wanberg;Ruth Kanfer;Darla J. Hamann;Zhen Zhang

Frequent Co-Authors

John D. Kammeyer-Mueller
John D. Kammeyer-Mueller University of Minnesota
Ruth Kanfer
Ruth Kanfer Georgia Institute of Technology
Edwin A. J. van Hooft
Edwin A. J. van Hooft University of Amsterdam
Jing Zhu
Jing Zhu Tsinghua University
Deniz S. Ones
Deniz S. Ones University of Minnesota
Chad H. Van Iddekinge
Chad H. Van Iddekinge Florida State University
Theresa M. Glomb
Theresa M. Glomb University of Minnesota
Jason D. Shaw
Jason D. Shaw Nanyang Technological University
Gary Johns
Gary Johns Concordia University
Evangelia Demerouti
Evangelia Demerouti Eindhoven University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study psychology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and career opportunities. Many students are drawn to career paths such as mental health counseling, therapy, and social work. Online degree programs in psychology and counseling can help you build foundational knowledge and meet the educational requirements needed to pursue licensure in your state.

Requirements for becoming a mental health counselor can vary depending on location. For example, Chicago mental health counselor education requirements highlight the need for a master’s degree and supervised clinical experience. If you plan to practice in another region, it’s important to research local expectations, such as how to become a mental health counselor in Chula Vista or how to become a mental health counselor in Cincinnati. Some areas, like Cleveland, also have specific guidelines and processes, detailed in Cleveland mental health counselor certification requirements.

Online programs accredited by recognized bodies can help prepare you for licensure while offering the flexibility needed by many working students. No matter your location, staying informed about state-specific requirements is essential to launching a successful career in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Connie R. Wanberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles