World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 67 2534 2318 1468 1312 154 34237

Lillian T. Eby publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lillian T. Eby between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lillian T. Eby published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 5.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2008. 9 of the 172 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2008. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 7 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 7 publications
1992 2025

172 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lillian T. Eby: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 1
1994 2
1995 1
1996 0
1997 5
1998 5
1999 4
2000 5
2001 1
2002 3
2003 8
2004 7
2005 4
2006 8
2007 5
2008 16
2009 1
2010 7
2011 3
2012 9
2013 12
2014 11
2015 9
2016 9
2017 4
2018 2
2019 3
2020 6
2021 3
2022 4
2023 4
2024 2
2025 7
Total 172
Download as CSV

Lillian T. Eby publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lillian T. Eby sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 154 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 154
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Lillian T. Eby D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lillian T. Eby sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66–67 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218 67
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Lillian T. Eby is affiliated with the University of Georgia in the United States. Their recent research output spans topics in social psychology, organizational behavior, and human resource management, among other areas. The scientist's work commonly appears in academic venues related to industrial and organizational psychology, management, and applied psychology.

Frequent publication venues for their research include:

  • Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
  • UNC Libraries

Their publications cover a range of topics such as mentoring and academic development, management and organizational studies, work-family balance challenges, COVID-19 pandemic impacts, occupational health and safety research, gender diversity and inequality, and human resource and talent management.

Main topics of work include:

  • Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Management and Organizational Studies
  • Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
  • Occupational Health and Safety Research
  • Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Human Resource and Talent Management

Subfields of study relevant to their research are:

  • Social Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • General Health Professions
  • Economics and Econometrics

Some of their recent published papers include:

  • "Stronger Together: A Call for Gender-Inclusive Leadership in Business Schools," 2023, Journal of Management
  • "A call to action: Taking the untenable out of women professors' pregnancy, postpartum, and caregiving demands," 2023, Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  • "Articulating scholarship in human resource management: Guidance for researchers," 2024, Human Resource Management Journal
  • "Reflections on the Journal of Applied Psychology in times of change," 2022, Journal of Applied Psychology
  • "Methodological checklists for improving research quality and reporting consistency," 2020, Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Lillian T. Eby has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, indicating ongoing professional partnerships in their research. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Melissa M. Robertson
  • David B. Facteau
  • Herman Aguinis
  • Tammy D. Allen
  • Jocelyn G. Anker

Best Publications

  • PREDICTORS OF OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE CAREER SUCCESS: A META‐ANALYSIS

    Thomas W. H. Ng;Lillian T. Eby;Kelly L. Sorensen;Daniel C. Feldman

  • Work and family research in IO/OB: Content analysis and review of the literature (1980–2002)

    Lillian T. Eby;Wendy J. Casper;Angie Lockwood;Chris Bordeaux

  • Career benefits associated with mentoring for protégés: A meta-analysis

    Tammy D. Allen;Lillian T. Eby;Mark L. Poteet;Elizabeth Lentz

  • Does Mentoring Matter? A Multidisciplinary Meta-Analysis Comparing Mentored and Non-Mentored Individuals

    Lillian T. Eby;Tammy D. Allen;Sarah C. Evans;Thomas Ng

  • Predictors of success in the era of the boundaryless career

    Lillian T. Eby;Marcus Butts;Angie Lockwood

  • Perceptions of Organizational Readiness for Change: Factors Related to Employees' Reactions to the Implementation of Team-Based Selling

    Lillian T. Eby;Danielle M. Adams;Joyce E.A. Russell;Stephen H. Gaby

  • Locus of control at work: a meta‐analysis

    Thomas W. H. Ng;Kelly L. Sorensen;Lillian T. Eby

  • Motivational bases of affective organizational commitment: A partial test of an integrative theoretical model

    Lillian T. Eby;Deena M. Freeman;Michael C. Rush;Charles E. Lance

  • Book Review: Survey Research Methods, 3rd ed., by Floyd J. Fowler Jr. (2002). Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage.

    Lillian T. Eby

  • A review of research methods in IO/OB work-family research.

    Wendy J. Casper;Lillian T. Eby;Christopher Bordeaux;Angie Lockwood

  • Mentorship behaviors and mentorship quality associated with formal mentoring programs: closing the gap between research and practice.

    Tammy D. Allen;Lillian T. Eby;Elizabeth Lentz

  • An interdisciplinary meta-analysis of the potential antecedents, correlates, and consequences of protégé perceptions of mentoring.

    Lillian Turner de Tormes Eby;Tammy D. Allen;Brian J. Hoffman;Lisa E. Baranik

  • The Protege's Perspective Regarding Negative Mentoring Experiences: The Development of a Taxonomy

    Lillian T. Eby;Stacy E. McManus;Shana A. Simon;Joyce E.A. Russell

  • Collectivistic orientation in teams: an individual and group-level analysis

    Lillian T. Eby;Gregory H. Dobbins

  • The Blackwell Handbook of Mentoring: A Multiple Perspectives Approach

    Tammy D. Allen;Lillian T. Eby

  • Protégés’ and mentors’ reactions to participating in formal mentoring programs: A qualitative investigation

    Lillian T. Eby;Angie Lockwood

  • Relationship Effectiveness for Mentors: Factors Associated with Learning and Quality:

    Tammy D. Allen;Lillian T. Eby

  • Alternative Forms of Mentoring in Changing Organizational Environments: A Conceptual Extension of the Mentoring Literature.

    Lillian T. Eby

  • Definition and Evolution of Mentoring

    Lillian T. Eby;Jean E. Rhodes;Tammy D. Allen

  • The state of mentoring research: A qualitative review of current research methods and future research implications

    Tammy D. Allen;Lillian T. Eby;Kimberly E. O’Brien;Elizabeth Lentz

  • Statistical and Methodological Myths and Urban Legends: Doctrine, Verity and Fable in the Organizational and Social Sciences

    Lillian T. Eby;Carrie S. Hurst;Marcus M Butts

Frequent Co-Authors

Tammy D. Allen
Tammy D. Allen University of South Florida
Joyce E. A. Russell
Joyce E. A. Russell University of Maryland, College Park
Belle Rose Ragins
Belle Rose Ragins University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
Thomas W. H. Ng
Thomas W. H. Ng University of Hong Kong
Wendy J. Casper
Wendy J. Casper The University of Texas at Arlington
Talya N. Bauer
Talya N. Bauer Portland State University
Daniel C. Feldman
Daniel C. Feldman University of Georgia
Frederick L. Oswald
Frederick L. Oswald Rice University
Russell E. Johnson
Russell E. Johnson Michigan State University
Brian J. Hoffman
Brian J. Hoffman University of Georgia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens the door to a wide range of online degree programs and fulfilling career pathways. For those interested in mental health counseling, it’s important to understand that certification requirements can differ significantly depending on your location. For example, Miami mental health counselor certification requirements include specific graduate degree credentials and a set number of supervised clinical hours.

Likewise, the mental health counselor requirements in Milwaukee focus on state-approved coursework and licensure exams. If you are considering Minneapolis, be aware that Minneapolis mental health counselor certification requirements have their own criteria for education and supervised experience.

In Nashville, the pathway to licensure involves meeting the Nashville mental health counselor certification requirements to practice legally and effectively. By pursuing an online psychology degree, students gain flexibility in learning while preparing for the unique professional standards found in each state.

Best Scientists Citing Lillian T. Eby

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles