World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
49
Citations
12705
World Ranking
5597
National Ranking
322

Jane W. Davidson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane W. Davidson sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 208 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jane W. Davidson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane W. Davidson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is she best known for?

The fields of study she is best known for:

  • Social science
  • Social psychology
  • Cognition

Jane W. Davidson focuses on Musical, Social psychology, Music education, Developmental psychology and Cognitive psychology. Her study focuses on the intersection of Musical and fields such as Perception with connections in the field of Performing arts, Covert, Observer and Musicology. Her work carried out in the field of Social psychology brings together such families of science as Musicality, Exploratory research, Choir and Ontology.

Her research in Music education focuses on subjects like Musical development, which are connected to Social environment, Dreyfus model of skill acquisition and Cognition. Her research in the fields of Aptitude overlaps with other disciplines such as Range. Her Cognitive psychology research includes themes of Communication, Expression and Gesture.

Her most cited work include:

  • Innate talents: reality or myth? (511 citations)
  • The role of practice in the development of performing musicians (301 citations)
  • Visual Perception of Performance Manner in the Movements of Solo Musicians (295 citations)

What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?

Jane W. Davidson mostly deals with Musical, Social psychology, Music education, Cognitive psychology and Developmental psychology. Her Musical research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Aesthetics, Perception and Communication. Her Social psychology research includes elements of Performing arts and Choir.

Music education is a subfield of Pedagogy that she studies. Jane W. Davidson works mostly in the field of Cognitive psychology, limiting it down to topics relating to Music psychology and, in certain cases, Music therapy, as a part of the same area of interest. Developmental psychology is closely attributed to Cognition in her research.

She most often published in these fields:

  • Musical (30.37%)
  • Social psychology (15.71%)
  • Music education (13.61%)

What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Musical (30.37%)
  • Aesthetics (9.95%)
  • Visual arts (7.85%)

In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:

Jane W. Davidson spends much of her time researching Musical, Aesthetics, Visual arts, Cognitive psychology and Well-being. In the field of Musical, her study on Music making overlaps with subjects such as Perspective. Her research in Aesthetics tackles topics such as Meaning which are related to areas like Feeling, Greeks, Power and Politics.

Her work in Visual arts covers topics such as Contextual information which are related to areas like Active listening. Her research integrates issues of Embodied cognition, Embodied music cognition, Simulation theory of empathy, Music psychology and Order in her study of Cognitive psychology. The various areas that Jane W. Davidson examines in her Well-being study include Psychosocial, Cognition, Applied psychology and Mood.

Between 2017 and 2021, her most popular works were:

  • Using Self-Determination Theory to Examine Musical Participation and Well-Being (10 citations)
  • Trait Empathy associated with Agreeableness and rhythmic entrainment in a spontaneous movement to music task: Preliminary exploratory investigations (10 citations)
  • Musical Activity and Well-being: A New Quantitative Measurement Instrument (9 citations)

In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Social science
  • Social psychology
  • Cognition

Her primary scientific interests are in Musical, Well-being, Cognitive psychology, Music psychology and Social psychology. Her study of Music making is a part of Musical. Her Well-being study combines topics in areas such as Coping, Categorization and Exploratory factor analysis.

Jane W. Davidson combines subjects such as Agreeableness, Embodied music cognition and Embodied cognition with her study of Cognitive psychology. In her research on the topic of Music psychology, Psychosocial, Developmental psychology, Autonomy, Competence and Perception is strongly related with Cognition. Her work in the fields of Social psychology, such as Personality, Individual difference, Impression management and Social group, intersects with other areas such as Investment.

Best Publications

  • Innate talents: reality or myth?

    Michael J. A. Howe;Jane W. Davidson;John A. Sloboda

  • Natural born talents undiscovered

    Michael J. A. Howe;Jane W. Davidson;John A. Sloboda

  • The role of practice in the development of performing musicians

    John A. Sloboda;Jane W. Davidson;Michael J. A. Howe;Derek G. Moore

  • Visual Perception of Performance Manner in the Movements of Solo Musicians

    Jane W. Davidson

  • The role of parental influences in the development of musical performance

    Jane W. Davidson;Michael J. A. Howe;Derek G. Moore;John A. Sloboda

  • Effects of group singing and performance for marginalized and middle-class singers

    Betty A. Bailey;Jane W. Davidson

  • Social and Musical Co-Ordination between Members of a String Quartet: An Exploratory Study

    Jane W. Davidson;James M. M. Good

  • Exploring co-performer communication

    Aaron Williamon;Jane W. Davidson

  • The young performing musician

    John Sloboda;Jane Davidson

  • The Role of Parents and Teachers in the Success and Failure of Instrumental Learners.

    J. W. Davidson;J. A. Sloboda;M. J. A. Howe

  • Adaptive Characteristics of Group Singing: Perceptions from Members of a Choir Forhomeless Men

    Betty A. Bailey;Jane W. Davidson

  • Characteristics of music teachers and the progress of young instrumentalists

    Jane W. Davidson;Derek G. Moore;John A. Sloboda;Michael J. A. Howe

  • The role of psychological needs in ceasing music and music learning activities

    Paul Evans;Gary E. McPherson;Jane W. Davidson

  • Musical Practice: Mother and child interactions during the first year of learning an instrument

    Gary E. Mcpherson;Jane W. Davidson

  • The social context of musical success: a developmental account.

    Derek G. Moore;Karen Burland;Jane W. Davidson

  • The Role of the Body in the Production and Perception of Solo Vocal Performance: A Case Study of Annie Lennox:

    Jane W. Davidson

  • The Effect of Music Therapy on Mood States in Neurological Patients: A Pilot Study

    Wendy L. Magee;Jane W. Davidson

  • Bodily communication in musical performance

    Jane Davidson

  • Music in Our Lives: Rethinking Musical Ability, Development and Identity

    Gary E. McPherson;Jane W. Davidson;Robert Faulkner

  • Playing an Instrument

    G Mcpherson;J Davidson;P Evans

  • Bodily movement and facial actions in expressive musical performance by solo and duo instrumentalists: Two distinctive case studies

    Jane W. Davidson

Frequent Co-Authors

Gary E. McPherson
Gary E. McPherson University of Melbourne
John A. Sloboda
John A. Sloboda Guildhall School of Music and Drama
Adrian C. North
Adrian C. North Curtin University
William J. Ledger
William J. Ledger University of New South Wales
Margaret S. Barrett
Margaret S. Barrett Monash University
Felicity A. Baker
Felicity A. Baker University of Melbourne
Lindsay G. Oades
Lindsay G. Oades University of Melbourne
Aaron Williamon
Aaron Williamon Royal College of Music
John Sutton
John Sutton Macquarie University
Jonathan A. Smith
Jonathan A. Smith Birkbeck, University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree online offers flexibility and access to diverse specializations, setting up graduates for various rewarding career pathways. One popular route is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), a credential that allows professionals to work in educational, clinical, or private settings, supporting individuals with behavioral and developmental challenges.

Each state has unique licensure and educational requirements for aspiring BCBAs. For example, those interested in becoming a bcba in Vermont need to follow specific state guidelines for supervised experience and exams. Similarly, Virginia bcba requirements emphasize the importance of approved coursework and practical supervision hours.

If you are considering becoming a bcba in Washington, understanding local regulations and the necessary steps is essential for certification. Likewise, West Virginia bcba requirements include obtaining a graduate degree and passing the relevant board exams.

Exploring these related online degrees and their career pathways helps students make informed choices, ensuring alignment with both their academic interests and state-specific certification processes.

Best Scientists Citing Jane W. Davidson

Trending Scientists