World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
71
Citations
68249
World Ranking
2095
National Ranking
235

Jonathan A. Smith publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan A. Smith sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 170 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jonathan A. Smith D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan A. Smith sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom University Of London
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom University Of London
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom University Of London
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom University Of London

Overview

Jonathan A. Smith is affiliated with Birkbeck, University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans the fields of Medicine and Psychology, with a strong focus on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Sociology and Political Science, Speech and Hearing, and Surgery. The scientist's work addresses key topics including Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare, Frailty in Older Adults, Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes, Reproductive Health and Technologies, Bipolar Disorder and Treatment, and Art Therapy and Mental Health.

Their recent publications include the following works: Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (2020) published in SAGE Research Methods Foundations; Achieving excellence in interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA): Four markers of high quality (2021) in Qualitative Research in Psychology; Multisystemic therapy versus management as usual in the treatment of adolescent antisocial behaviour (START): 5-year follow-up of a pragmatic, randomised, controlled, superiority trial (2020) in The Lancet Psychiatry; Lived experiences of Indian Youth amid COVID-19 crisis: An interpretative phenomenological analysis (2020) in International Journal of Social Psychiatry; and Clinical effectiveness of the psychological therapy Mental Health Intervention for Children with Epilepsy in addition to usual care compared with assessment-enhanced usual care alone: a multicentre, randomised controlled clinical trial in the UK (2024) in The Lancet.

Jonathan A. Smith has collaborated frequently with several researchers. Notable coauthors include Isabella E. Nizza with 17 joint publications, Rachel A. Starr with 7, Joanna Farr with 6, John Rhodes with 5, and Angeline Price also with 5 publications.

The scientist has contributed to book publications, including Essentials of interpretative phenomenological analysis (2021), published by the American Psychological Association.

Jonathan A. Smith commonly publishes their work in scholarly journals such as the Journal of Genetic Counseling, Art & Perception, Age and Ageing, Counselling Psychology Quarterly, and British Journal of Surgery, each with multiple articles.

Jonathan A. Smith has been recognized as a Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom, with an affiliation noted as University Of London.

  • Medicine
  • Psychology

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Speech and Hearing
  • Surgery

  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
  • Frailty in Older Adults
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Art Therapy and Mental Health

  • Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (2020), SAGE Research Methods Foundations
  • Achieving excellence in interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA): Four markers of high quality (2021), Qualitative Research in Psychology
  • Multisystemic therapy versus management as usual in the treatment of adolescent antisocial behaviour (START): 5-year follow-up of a pragmatic, randomised, controlled, superiority trial (2020), The Lancet Psychiatry
  • Lived experiences of Indian Youth amid COVID-19 crisis: An interpretative phenomenological analysis (2020), International Journal of Social Psychiatry
  • Clinical effectiveness of the psychological therapy Mental Health Intervention for Children with Epilepsy in addition to usual care compared with assessment-enhanced usual care alone: a multicentre, randomised controlled clinical trial in the UK (2024), The Lancet

  • Isabella E. Nizza (17 publications)
  • Rachel A. Starr (7 publications)
  • Joanna Farr (6 publications)
  • John Rhodes (5 publications)
  • Angeline Price (5 publications)

  • Journal of Genetic Counseling
  • Art & Perception
  • Age and Ageing
  • Counselling Psychology Quarterly
  • British journal of surgery

Best Publications

  • Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis

    Jonathan A. Smith;Mike Osborn

  • Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research

    Jonathan A. Smith;Paul Flowers;Michael Larkin

  • Reflecting on the development of interpretative phenomenological analysis and its contribution to qualitative research in psychology

    Jonathan A. Smith

  • Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: using interpretative phenomenological analysis in health psychology

    Jonathan A. Smith

  • Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to research methods

    Jonathan A. Smith

  • A practical guide to using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis in qualitative research psychology

    Igor Pietkiewicz;Jonathan A. Smith

  • Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis

    Jonathan A. Smith

  • Semi structured interviewing and qualitative analysis

    Jonathan A. Smith

  • Rethinking Methods in Psychology

    Jonathan Smith;Luk Van Langenhove;Rom Harré

  • Pain as an assault on the self: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the psychological impact of chronic benign low back pain

    Jonathan A. Smith;Mike Osborn

  • Hermeneutics, human sciences and health: linking theory and practice

    Jonathan A Smith

  • Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methods

    Mary Dixon-Woods;Alex Sutton;Rachel L. Shaw;Tina Miller

  • Interpretative phenomenological analysis and the psychology of health and illness

    Jonathan A. Smith;Paul Flowers;Mike Osborn

  • The personal experience of chronic benign lower back pain: An interpretative phenomenological analysis

    Mike Osborn;Jonathan A. Smith

  • Alcohol consumption and masculine identity among young men

    Richard O de Visser;Jonathan A Smith

  • Interpretative phenomenological analysis and the new genetics.

    Elizabeth Chapman;Jonathan A. Smith

  • I was like a wild wild person: understanding feelings of anger using interpretative phenomenological analysis

    Virginia Eatough;Jonathan A. Smith

  • Identity development during the transition to motherhood: An interpretative phenomenological analysis

    Jonathan A. Smith

  • Finding qualitative research: an evaluation of search strategies

    Rachel L Shaw;Andrew Booth;Alex J Sutton;Tina Miller

  • Idiography and the case study

    Jonathan A. Smith

  • Women, Anger, and Aggression: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis

    Virginia Eatough;Jonathan A. Smith;Rachel L. Shaw

Frequent Co-Authors

Susan Michie
Susan Michie University College London
Paul Flowers
Paul Flowers University of Strathclyde
Richard O. de Visser
Richard O. de Visser University of Sussex
Mary Dixon-Woods
Mary Dixon-Woods University of Cambridge
Glynis M. Breakwell
Glynis M. Breakwell University of Bath
Nigel Beail
Nigel Beail University of Sheffield
Paschal Sheeran
Paschal Sheeran University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Bridget Young
Bridget Young University of Liverpool
Andrew Booth
Andrew Booth University of Sheffield
David R. Jones
David R. Jones Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology online offers flexible options for students seeking reputable programs across the USA. As mental health awareness grows, demand for skilled professionals expands in counseling, research, education, and industry. Selecting the right degree can determine future career direction, whether pursuing therapy, human resources, clinical roles, or academia.

Many students start their research by comparing programs in major cities and regions. The best psychology degree rankings in New York City highlight leading institutions in one of the country’s largest job markets. For those near New Jersey, the top psychology degrees in Newark provide access to programs with diverse focus areas.

Beyond metropolitan hubs, quality education is available in other states, such as the top psychology degrees in New Hampshire, which are known for their student support and cutting-edge research. On the West Coast, prospective students can explore the best psychology degree rankings in Orange for programs offering comprehensive online and hybrid learning paths.

These resources make it easier to find accredited online psychology degrees that align with your aspirations, supporting both immediate learning and long-term career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan A. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles