World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 100 8092 7606 4198 3885 248 85234

Matt van de Rijn publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Matt van de Rijn between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Matt van de Rijn published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 12.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 182 publications in 2023. 112 of the 536 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
50 100 150
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 182. Peak 182 publications in 2023. 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 182 publications 2024: 46 publications 2025: 66 publications
1983 2025

536 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Matt van de Rijn: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 1
1984 0
1985 1
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 1
1994 0
1995 4
1996 4
1997 3
1998 2
1999 6
2000 4
2001 4
2002 11
2003 13
2004 10
2005 12
2006 7
2007 12
2008 16
2009 12
2010 10
2011 11
2012 14
2013 10
2014 9
2015 8
2016 7
2017 5
2018 13
2019 11
2020 3
2021 7
2022 11
2023 182
2024 46
2025 66
Total 536
Download as CSV

Matt van de Rijn publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matt van de Rijn sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–260 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 248 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545 248
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Matt van de Rijn D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matt van de Rijn sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 100–101 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611 100
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Matt van de Rijn is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States and conducts research primarily in the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their work spans various subfields including Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, Oncology, Immunology, and Cancer Research.

The scientist's research topics focus notably on Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment, Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, Musculoskeletal Synovial Abnormalities and Treatments, Single-cell and Spatial Transcriptomics, CAR-T Cell Therapy Research, Immune Cells in Cancer, and Cancer Cells and Metastasis.

Recent publications by Matt van de Rijn include the following papers:

  • Atlas of clinically distinct cell states and ecosystems across human solid tumors (2021, Cell)
  • The immunoregulatory landscape of human tuberculosis granulomas (2022, Nature Immunology)
  • A spatially resolved timeline of the human maternal-fetal interface (2023, Nature)
  • Spatially Segregated Macrophage Populations Predict Distinct Outcomes in Colon Cancer (2024, Cancer Discovery)
  • Best clinical management of tenosynovial giant cell tumour (TGCT): A consensus paper from the community of experts (2022, Cancer Treatment Reviews)

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Matt van de Rijn are Magdalena Matusiak, Sushama Varma, Everett J. Moding, Joanna Przybył, and Kristen N. Ganjoo.

Publication venues where Matt van de Rijn has contributed multiple works include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) with 9 publications, Cancer Research with 8, Clinical Cancer Research with 5, Nature Immunology with 2, and Cancer Discovery with 2 publications.

Best Publications

  • Molecular portraits of human breast tumours

    Charles M. Perou;Therese Sørlie;Michael B. Eisen;Matt van de Rijn

  • Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications

    Therese Sørlie;Charles M. Perou;Robert Tibshirani;Turid Aas

  • Immunohistochemical and Clinical Characterization of the Basal-Like Subtype of Invasive Breast Carcinoma

    Torsten O. Nielsen;Forrest D. Hsu;Kristin Jensen;Maggie Cheang

  • Systematic variation in gene expression patterns in human cancer cell lines.

    Douglas T. Ross;Uwe Scherf;Michael B. Eisen;Charles M. Perou

  • Distinctive gene expression patterns in human mammary epithelial cells and breast cancers

    Charles M. Perou;Stefanie S. Jeffrey;Matt van de Rijn;Christian A. Rees

  • Diversity of gene expression in adenocarcinoma of the lung

    Mitchell E. Garber;Olga G. Troyanskaya;Karsten Schluens;Simone Petersen

  • Gene expression profiling identifies clinically relevant subtypes of prostate cancer

    Jacques Lapointe;Chunde Li;John P. Higgins;Matt van de Rijn

  • The CD47-signal regulatory protein alpha (SIRPa) interaction is a therapeutic target for human solid tumors

    Stephen B. Willingham;Jens Peter Volkmer;Andrew J. Gentles;Debashis Sahoo

  • Robustness, scalability, and integration of a wound-response gene expression signature in predicting breast cancer survival

    Howard Y. Chang;Dimitry S. A. Nuyten;Julie B. Sneddon;Trevor Hastie

  • Gene Expression Signature of Fibroblast Serum Response Predicts Human Cancer Progression: Similarities between Tumors and Wounds

    Howard Y. Chang;Julie B Sneddon;Ash A. Alizadeh;Ruchira Sood

  • Gene expression patterns in human liver cancers.

    Xin Chen;Siu Tim Cheung;Samuel So;Sheung Tat Fan

  • Comprehensive and Integrated Genomic Characterization of Adult Soft Tissue Sarcomas

    Adam Abeshouse;Clement Adebamowo;Sally N. Adebamowo;Rehan Akbani

  • Endothelial cell diversity revealed by global expression profiling

    Jen-Tsan Chi;Howard Y. Chang;Guttorm Haraldsen;Frode L. Jahnsen

  • The Novel Marker, DOG1, Is Expressed Ubiquitously in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Irrespective of KIT or PDGFRA Mutation Status

    Robert B. West;Christopher L Corless;Xin Chen;Brian P. Rubin

  • Human melanoma-initiating cells express neural crest nerve growth factor receptor CD271

    Alexander D. Boiko;Olga V. Razorenova;Matt van de Rijn;Susan M Swetter;Susan M Swetter

  • Systematic analysis of breast cancer morphology uncovers stromal features associated with survival.

    Andrew H. Beck;Ankur R. Sangoi;Ankur R. Sangoi;Samuel Leung;Robert J. Marinelli

  • Expression of Cytokeratins 17 and 5 Identifies a Group of Breast Carcinomas with Poor Clinical Outcome

    Matt van de Rijn;Charles M. Perou;Rob Tibshirani;Phillippe Haas

  • Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy number variation in breast cancer using DNA microarrays

    Jonathan R. Pollack;Charles M. Perou;Therese Sorlie;Ash A. Alizadeh

  • Identification, molecular characterization, clinical prognosis, and therapeutic targeting of human bladder tumor-initiating cells

    Keith Syson Chan;Inigo Espinosa;Mark Chao;David Wong

  • Molecular characterisation of soft tissue tumours: a gene expression study

    Torsten O Nielsen;Rob B West;Sabine C Linn;Orly Alter

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert B. West
Robert B. West Stanford University
Patrick O. Brown
Patrick O. Brown Stanford University
Torsten O. Nielsen
Torsten O. Nielsen University of British Columbia
C. Blake Gilks
C. Blake Gilks University of British Columbia
David Botstein
David Botstein Princeton University
Jonathan R. Pollack
Jonathan R. Pollack Stanford University
Jonathan A. Fletcher
Jonathan A. Fletcher Brigham and Women's Hospital
Subbaya Subramanian
Subbaya Subramanian University of Minnesota
Brian P. Rubin
Brian P. Rubin Cleveland Clinic
Irving L. Weissman
Irving L. Weissman Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in medicine but seeking alternative or supporting career paths, there are several online degree options worth exploring. Many students begin by applying to the easiest nursing schools to get into, as these programs may offer more accessible entry requirements while still providing a route into the healthcare field.

Some nursing schools have also removed common entrance exams, making it simpler to start your studies. You can look into nursing programs without teas if you want to avoid these standardized tests.

Beyond nursing, administrative and support roles in healthcare are growing rapidly. Many students pursue credentials at accredited medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid. These programs help you quickly gain the skills needed for key non-clinical positions.

For those aiming to move into managerial roles, you may consider the best online healthcare administration degree programs, which are designed to deliver career-focused training in less time.

Best Scientists Citing Matt van de Rijn

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles