World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 59 1589 1424 62 59 252 10955

Max L. Stek publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Max L. Stek between 2000 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Max L. Stek published across 24 years, from 2000 to 2023, averaging 11 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2015. 7 of the 265 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2015. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 6 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 31 publications 2016: 29 publications 2017: 25 publications 2018: 22 publications 2019: 24 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 1 publication
2000 2023

265 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Max L. Stek: publications per year, 2000 to 2023
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 1
2002 1
2003 1
2004 6
2005 4
2006 2
2007 3
2008 2
2009 4
2010 7
2011 9
2012 12
2013 18
2014 21
2015 31
2016 29
2017 25
2018 22
2019 24
2020 17
2021 18
2022 6
2023 1
Total 265
Download as CSV

Max L. Stek publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Max L. Stek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 244–253 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 252 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167 252
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Max L. Stek D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Max L. Stek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105 59
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Max L. Stek is affiliated with Leiden University Medical Center in the Netherlands. Their research focuses predominantly on medicine, with a strong emphasis on psychiatry and mental health. Other subfields covered in their work include pharmacology, clinical psychology, general health professions, and neurology.

The main topics of Stek's research span several areas, including:

  • Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Treatment of Major Depression
  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare

Stek has contributed to numerous publications, frequently appearing in several key scientific journals. These venues include:

  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • BMC Geriatrics
  • American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
  • International Psychogeriatrics
  • Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Stek cover a range of topics related to mental health and aging, with publication years from 2020 to 2022. Selected works include:

  • Loneliness, social network size and mortality in older adults: a meta-analysis, 2022, European Journal of Ageing
  • Structural changes induced by electroconvulsive therapy are associated with clinical outcome, 2020, Brain Stimulation
  • Effectiveness of Pharmacological Interventions for Symptoms of Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia: A Systematic Review, 2020, Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology
  • Cognitive performance in older-age bipolar disorder: Investigating psychiatric characteristics, cardiovascular burden and psychotropic medication, 2021, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
  • Stability and transition of depression subtypes in late life, 2020, Journal of Affective Disorders

Stek collaborates extensively with several researchers in their field. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Annemiek Dols
  • Didi Rhebergen
  • Pascal Sienaert
  • Filip Bouckaert
  • Mardien L. Oudega

Best Publications

  • Feelings of loneliness, but not social isolation, predict dementia onset: results from the Amsterdam Study of the Elderly (AMSTEL)

    Tjalling Jan Holwerda;Dorly J H Deeg;Aartjan T F Beekman;Theo G van Tilburg

  • Temporal relation between depression and cognitive impairment in old age: prospective population based study

    David J Vinkers;Jacobijn Gussekloo;Max L Stek;Rudi G J Westendorp

  • Increased risk of mortality associated with social isolation in older men: only when feeling lonely? Results from the Amsterdam Study of the Elderly (AMSTEL)

    Tjalling J. Holwerda;Aartjan T. F. Beekman;Dorly J. H. Deeg;Max L Stek

  • Inflammation and interleukin-1 signaling network contribute to depressive symptoms but not cognitive decline in old age.

    Anita H.J. van den Biggelaar;Jacobijn Gussekloo;Anton J.M. de Craen;Marijke Frölich

  • Prevalence, correlates and recognition of depression in the oldest old: the Leiden 85-plus study

    M.L. Stek;J. Gussekloo;A.T.F. Beekman;W. van Tilburg

  • Prevalence and risk-factors for depression in elderly Turkish and Moroccan migrants in the Netherlands.

    Unknown

  • ECT: its brain enabling effects: a review of electroconvulsive therapy-induced structural brain plasticity.

    Filip Bouckaert;Pascal Sienaert;Jasmien Obbels;Annemieke Dols

  • Volume of the human Hippocampus and clinical response following Electroconvulsive Therapy

    Leif Oltedal;Katherine L. Narr;Christopher Abbott;Amit Anand

  • The Netherlands study of depression in older persons (NESDO); a prospective cohort study

    Hannie C. Comijs;Harm W. Van Marwijk;Roos C. Van Der Mast;Paul Naarding

  • Impact of loneliness and depression on mortality: results from the Longitudinal Ageing Study Amsterdam.

    Tjalling J. Holwerda;Theo G. van Tilburg;Dorly J. H. Deeg;Natasja Schutter

  • Is Depression in Old Age Fatal Only When People Feel Lonely

    Max L. Stek;David J. Vinkers;Jacobijn Gussekloo;Aartjan T.F. Beekman

  • Big Five personality and depression diagnosis, severity and age of onset in older adults

    A.M.L. Koorevaar;H.C. Comijs;A.D.F. Dhondt;H.W.J. van Marwijk

  • The two-year course of late-life depression; results from the Netherlands study of depression in older persons.

    Hannie C Comijs;Jasper Nieuwesteeg;Rob Kok;Harm W van Marwijk

  • Childhood abuse in late-life depression

    Hannie C Comijs;Eric van Exel;Roos C van der Mast;Anna Paauw

  • Onset of Anxiety and Depression in the Aging Population: Comparison of Risk Factors in a 9-Year Prospective Study

    Dagmar Vink;Marja J. Aartsen;Hannie C. Comijs;Martijn W. Heymans;Martijn W. Heymans

  • Prognostic significance of social network, social support and loneliness for course of major depressive disorder in adulthood and old age

    R H S van den Brink;N Schutter;D J C Hanssen;B M Elzinga

  • Neurocognitive effects after brief pulse and ultrabrief pulse unilateral electroconvulsive therapy for major depression: a review.

    Esmée Verwijk;Hannie C. Comijs;Hannie C. Comijs;Rob M. Kok;Harm Pieter Spaans

  • The 15‐item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS‐15) detects changes in depressive symptoms after a major negative life event. The Leiden 85‐plus Study

    David J. Vinkers;Jacobijn Gussekloo;Max L. Stek;Rudi G. J. Westendorp

  • Grey matter volume increase following electroconvulsive therapy in patients with late life depression: a longitudinal MRI study.

    Filip Bouckaert;François-Laurent De Winter;Louise Emsell;Annemieke Dols

  • Schizophrenia spectrum disorders in later life: prevalence and distribution of age at onset and sex in a dutch catchment area.

    Paul D. Meesters;Lieuwe de Haan;Hannie C. Comijs;Max L. Stek

  • Natural history of depression in the oldest old: population-based prospective study.

    Max L. Stek;David J. Vinkers;Jacobijn Gussekloo;Roos C. Van Der Mast

  • Speed of remission in elderly patients with depression: electroconvulsive therapy v. medication

    Harm Pieter Spaans;Pascal Sienaert;Filip Bouckaert;Julia F. Van Den Berg

  • Cognitive impairment in early and late bipolar disorder.

    Sigfried N.T.M. Schouws;Hannie C. Comijs;Max L. Stek;Jack Dekker

  • A Review of Pain Prevalence in Alzheimer's, Vascular, Frontotemporal and Lewy Body Dementias

    Janine van Kooten;Tarik T. Binnekade;Johannes C. van der Wouden;Max L. Stek

  • Vascular factors and markers of inflammation in offspring with a parental history of late-onset Alzheimer disease.

    Eric van Exel;Piet Eikelenboom;Hannie Comijs;Marijke Frölich

  • The center for epidemiological studies depression scale (CES‐D) is an adequate screening instrument for depressive and anxiety disorders in a very old population living in residential homes

    Els Dozeman;Digna J. F. van Schaik;Harm W. J. van Marwijk;Max L. Stek

  • Relationship Between Hippocampal Volume, Serum BDNF, and Depression Severity Following Electroconvulsive Therapy in Late-Life Depression.

    Filip Bouckaert;Annemiek Dols;Louise Emsell;François-Laurent De Winter

Frequent Co-Authors

Hannie C. Comijs
Hannie C. Comijs VU University Medical Center
Aartjan T.F. Beekman
Aartjan T.F. Beekman Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Philip Scheltens
Philip Scheltens Amsterdam UMC
Piet Eikelenboom
Piet Eikelenboom Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Frederik Barkhof
Frederik Barkhof University College London
Niels D. Prins
Niels D. Prins Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Richard C. Oude Voshaar
Richard C. Oude Voshaar University Medical Center Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a future in Social Sciences and Humanities opens up diverse and impactful career paths. Thanks to the rise of online learning, students can now pursue specialized degrees with greater flexibility and often at a lower cost. Whether your interest lies in psychology, social work, counseling, or therapy, there are abundant online options.

For those seeking value, affordable online psychology degrees provide a cost-effective route into key fields like mental health, research, and human services. If your goal is to become a licensed clinical social worker, consider the flexibility of an online msw program for faster entry into community service and advocacy roles.

Those aspiring to doctoral-level practice in psychology will find that the best online psyd program options emphasize both clinical skills and practical experience. Meanwhile, counseling-focused students interested in family and couples therapy can benefit from the convenience of accelerated mft programs online to achieve their career goals in less time.

These diverse online degree pathways offer the opportunity to balance education with work or family commitments—making advanced study in Social Sciences and Humanities more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Max L. Stek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles