World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Joachim Kuhlemann

Joachim Kuhlemann

Joachim Kuhlemann publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Joachim Kuhlemann between 1993 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Joachim Kuhlemann published across 27 years, from 1993 to 2019, averaging 2.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2001. 1 of the 64 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2001. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 2 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication
1993 2019

64 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Joachim Kuhlemann: publications per year, 1993 to 2019
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 0
1995 1
1996 0
1997 2
1998 3
1999 2
2000 4
2001 7
2002 3
2003 3
2004 2
2005 2
2006 3
2007 4
2008 3
2009 5
2010 1
2011 2
2012 5
2013 3
2014 5
2015 0
2016 2
2017 0
2018 0
2019 1
Total 64
Download as CSV

Joachim Kuhlemann publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joachim Kuhlemann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Joachim Kuhlemann D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joachim Kuhlemann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Joachim Kuhlemann is affiliated with the University of Tübingen in Germany. Their academic career is primarily connected to this institution, contributing to its research community.

There is no available data on recent papers authored by Joachim Kuhlemann, nor are there records of frequent co-authors or common publication venues. Additionally, there are no listed main fields of study, subfields, or main topics of work associated with their research profile.

No book publications or awards have been documented for Joachim Kuhlemann. The absence of detailed publication or research topic information limits the scope of their publicly available academic footprint.

Based on the available information, Joachim Kuhlemann's professional profile is characterized by their association with the University of Tübingen, with no further specifics on research areas, publications, or collaborations at this time.

Best Publications

  • Palinspastic reconstruction and topographic evolution of the Eastern Alps during late Tertiary tectonic extrusion

    Wolfgang Frisch;Joachim Kuhlemann;István Dunkl;Achim Brügel

  • Post-Eocene evolution of the North Alpine Foreland Basin and its response to Alpine tectonics

    Joachim Kuhlemann;Oliver Kempf

  • Post-collisional orogen-parallel large-scale extension in the Eastern Alps

    W Frisch;I Dunkl;J Kuhlemann

  • Regional Synthesis of Mediterranean Atmospheric Circulation During the Last Glacial Maximum

    J. Kuhlemann;Eelco Rohling;I. Krumrei;Peter Kubik

  • Post-collisional sediment budget history of the Alps:tectonic versus climatic control

    J. Kuhlemann;W. Frisch;B. Székely;I. Dunkl

  • Paleogeographic and paleotopographic evolution of the Swiss and Eastern Alps since the Oligocene

    Joachim Kuhlemann

  • TOPO-EUROPE: the geoscience of coupled deep earth-surface processes

    S. A. P. L. Cloetingh;P. A. Ziegler;P. J. A. Bogaard;P. A. M. Andriessen

  • Quantifying tectonic versus erosive denudation by the sediment budget: the Miocene core complexes of the Alps

    J. Kuhlemann;W. Frisch;I. Dunkl;B. Székely

  • The Dachstein paleosurface and the Augenstein Formation in the Northern Calcareous Alps – a mosaic stone in the geomorphological evolution of the Eastern Alps

    Wolfgang Frisch;Joachim Kuhlemann;István Dunkl;Balázs Székely

  • The Palaeogene forearc basin of the Eastern Alps and Western Carpathians: subduction erosion and basin evolution

    Miklós Kázmér;István Dunkl;Wolfgang Frisch;Joachim Kuhlemann

  • From source terrains of the Eastern Alps to the Molasse Basin: Detrital record of non-steady-state exhumation

    J. Kuhlemann;I. Dunkl;A. Brügel;C. Spiegel

  • Glaciation in the Rila mountains (Bulgaria) during the Last Glacial Maximum

    Joachim Kuhlemann;Emil Gachev;Alexander Gikov;Stoyan Nedkov

  • The erosion history of the Central Alps: evidence from zircon fission track data of the foreland basin sediments

    C. Spiegel;J. Kuhlemann;I. Dunkl;W. Frisch

  • Toward a comprehensive provenance analysis: A multi-method approach and its implications for the evolution of the Central Alps

    Cornelia Spiegel;Wolfgang Siebel;Joachim Kuhlemann;Wolfgang Frisch

  • Miocene rotations in the Eastern Alps — palaeomagnetic results from intramontane basin sediments

    Emő Márton;Joachim Kuhlemann;Wolfgang Frisch;István Dunkl

  • Thermochronological constraints on the long-term erosional history of the Karkonosze Mts., Central Europe

    Martin Danišík;Martin Danišík;Piotr Migoń;Joachim Kuhlemann;Noreen J. Evans;Noreen J. Evans

  • Burial and exhumation of Corsica (France) in the light of fission track data

    Martin Danišík;Joachim Kuhlemann;István Dunkl;Balázs Székely

  • Geomorphological evolution of the Eastern Alps in response to Miocene tectonics

    Wolfgang Frisch;Balázs Székely;Joachim Kuhlemann;István Dunkl

  • Paleogeography and catchment evolution in a mobile orogenic belt: the Central Alps in Oligo–Miocene times

    Cornelia Spiegel;Joachim Kuhlemann;István Dunkl;Wolfgang Frisch

  • Are pooled tree ring δ13C and δ18O series reliable climate archives? — A case study of Pinus nigra spp. laricio (Corsica/France)

    S. Szymczak;M.M. Joachimski;A. Bräuning;T. Hetzer;T. Hetzer

Frequent Co-Authors

Wolfgang Frisch
Wolfgang Frisch University of Tübingen
István Dunkl
István Dunkl University of Göttingen
Martin Danišík
Martin Danišík Curtin University
Noreen J. Evans
Noreen J. Evans Curtin University
Peter W. Kubik
Peter W. Kubik ETH Zurich
Gábor Molnár
Gábor Molnár Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Johannes A. C. Barth
Johannes A. C. Barth University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Ralf Schiebel
Ralf Schiebel Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
Paul D. Bons
Paul D. Bons University of Tübingen
Marco G. Malusà
Marco G. Malusà University of Milano-Bicocca

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science opens doors to various interdisciplinary fields, including art and language, which enhance career opportunities. For those interested in blending creativity with technical knowledge, an online photography degree can complement scientific skills by fostering visual communication and documentation abilities crucial for environmental studies and research.

Veterans seeking flexible education options might find valuable resources through military friendly online photography degree programs, which offer tailored support to transition military skills into creative and scientific career pathways.

Language proficiency is another asset in Earth Science, especially for global research collaboration. Pursuing an online degree in Spanish can enhance communication and open up international job markets, combining linguistic skills with scientific expertise.

Veterans can also benefit from targeted resources such as best online Spanish degree programs for veterans, which provide structured support and specialized programs to help translate their background into new career opportunities within Earth Science and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Joachim Kuhlemann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles