World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
41
Citations
8365
World Ranking
5746
National Ranking
301

Nina Farwig publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nina Farwig sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 185 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Nina Farwig D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nina Farwig sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nina Farwig is affiliated with Philipp University of Marburg in Germany and conducts research primarily in Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Their work spans various subfields including Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling, and Global and Planetary Change.

The scientist's research covers diverse topics such as Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Plant and Animal Studies, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Plant Parasitism and Resistance, Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies, and Land Use and Ecosystem Services.

Farwig has contributed to multiple recent papers focused on ecological and biological science themes. Notable publications include:

  • The contribution of insects to global forest deadwood decomposition, 2021, Nature
  • Biodiversity post-2020: Closing the gap between global targets and national-level implementation, 2021, Conservation Letters
  • Limited potential for bird migration to disperse plants to cooler latitudes, 2021, Nature
  • The role of the brown bear Ursus arctos as a legitimate megafaunal seed disperser, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Frugivore-mediated seed dispersal in fragmented landscapes: Compositional and functional turnover from forest to matrix, 2023, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Nina Farwig has frequently collaborated with several coauthors, including Dana G. Schabo, Sascha Rösner, Roland Brandl, Jörg Bendix, and Jörg Albrecht.

The scientist has published regularly in specific academic venues such as Basic and Applied Ecology, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Functional Ecology, Biological Conservation, and Journal of Avian Biology.

Farwig has also contributed to book publications through the publisher oekom verlag, with titles including "Faktencheck Artenvielfalt," published in 2024.

Best Publications

  • Averting biodiversity collapse in tropical forest protected areas

    William F. Laurance;William F. Laurance;D. Carolina Useche;Julio Rendeiro;Margareta Kalka

  • The interplay of landscape composition and configuration: new pathways to manage functional biodiversity and agroecosystem services across Europe

    Emily A. Martin;Matteo Dainese;Yann Clough;András Báldi

  • An estimate of the number of tropical tree species

    J. W. Ferry Slik;Víctor Arroyo-Rodríguez;Shin-Ichiro Aiba;Patricia Alvarez-Loayza

  • The database of the PREDICTS (Projecting Responses of Ecological Diversity In Changing Terrestrial Systems) project

    Lawrence N. Hudson;Tim Newbold;Tim Newbold;Sara Contu;Samantha L.L. Hill;Samantha L.L. Hill

  • The PREDICTS database: a global database of how local terrestrial biodiversity responds to human impacts

    Lawrence N Hudson;Tim Newbold;Tim Newbold;Sara Contu;Samantha L L Hill;Samantha L L Hill

  • Comparing species interaction networks along environmental gradients.

    Loïc Pellissier;Camille Albouy;Camille Albouy;Jordi Bascompte;Nina Farwig

  • Ecological networks are more sensitive to plant than to animal extinction under climate change

    Matthias Schleuning;Jochen Fründ;Jochen Fründ;Oliver Schweiger;Erik Welk

  • The contribution of insects to global forest deadwood decomposition

    Sebastian Seibold;Werner Rammer;Torsten Hothorn;Rupert Seidl

  • A comprehensive analysis of autocorrelation and bias in home range estimation

    Michael J. Noonan;Michael J. Noonan;Marlee A. Tucker;Christen H. Fleming;Christen H. Fleming;Thomas S. Akre

  • Enhanced seed dispersal of Prunus africana in fragmented and disturbed forests

    Nina Farwig;Katrin Böhning-Gaese;Bärbel Bleher

  • Phylogenetic classification of the world's tropical forests

    J. W.Ferry Slik;Janet Franklin;Víctor Arroyo-Rodríguez;Richard Field

  • Imagine a world without seed dispersers: A review of threats, consequences and future directions

    Nina Farwig;Dana G. Berens

  • Predicting bee community responses to land-use changes : Effects of geographic and taxonomic biases

    Adriana De Palma;Adriana De Palma;Stefan Abrahamczyk;Marcelo A. Aizen;Matthias Albrecht

  • Effects of local disturbance of tropical forests on frugivores and seed removal of a small-seeded afrotropical tree.

    Jasper Mbae Kirika;Nina Farwig;Katrin Böhning-Gaese

  • Isolation from forest reduces pollination, seed predation and insect scavenging in Swiss farmland

    Nina Farwig;Nina Farwig;Debra Bailey;Estée Bochud;John D. Herrmann

  • Ants as indicators of environmental change and ecosystem processes

    Yvonne Tiede;Jan Schlautmann;David A. Donoso;Christine I.B. Wallis

  • Biodiversity post-2020: Closing the gap between global targets and national-level implementation

    Andrea Perino;Henrique M. Pereira;Henrique M. Pereira;Maria Felipe-Lucia;HyeJin Kim

  • Forest fragmentation and selective logging have inconsistent effects on multiple animal-mediated ecosystem processes in a tropical forest.

    Matthias Schleuning;Nina Farwig;Marcell K. Peters;Thomas Bergsdorf

  • Conservation value of forest plantations for bird communities in western Kenya

    Nina Farwig;Nixon Sajita;Katrin Böhning-Gaese

  • Human disturbance reduces genetic diversity of an endangered tropical tree, Prunus africana (Rosaceae)

    Nina Farwig;Carsten Braun;Katrin Böhning-Gaese

  • Effects of forest modification on bird community composition and seed removal in a heterogeneous landscape in South Africa

    Eike Lena Neuschulz;Alexandra Botzat;Nina Farwig

Frequent Co-Authors

Katrin Böhning-Gaese
Katrin Böhning-Gaese Goethe University Frankfurt
Tim Diekötter
Tim Diekötter Kiel University
Ingo Grass
Ingo Grass University of Hohenheim
Jörg Bendix
Jörg Bendix Philipp University of Marburg
Roland Brandl
Roland Brandl Philipp University of Marburg
Douglas Sheil
Douglas Sheil Wageningen University & Research
Michael Kessler
Michael Kessler University of Zurich
Jason M. Tylianakis
Jason M. Tylianakis University of Canterbury
Teja Tscharntke
Teja Tscharntke University of Göttingen
Andy Purvis
Andy Purvis Natural History Museum

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

An academic background in Ecology and Evolution opens diverse avenues within science, education, conservation, and beyond. Many students consider supplementing or transitioning their expertise through flexible online programs. For instance, pivoting from a science teaching role into a healthcare profession is increasingly popular—get insights on pathways like shifting from teacher to speech language pathologist, a transition that blends education and health sciences.

Broadening your skillset through the digital space is easier than ever. If you're interested in integrating design into your science background, consider options such as online graphic design courses. For those drawn to analyzing complex biological data, studying through online degree mathematics programs can be extremely valuable.

Additionally, ecology intersects with urban planning and sustainable design. Pursuing an architecture online degree provides a foundation in building eco-friendly environments. These options allow you to tailor your career pathway with credentials that complement your ecological expertise, all while studying at your own pace.

Best Scientists Citing Nina Farwig

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles