World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Martin Danišík

Martin Danišík

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 40 5901 5460 297 282 260 5390

Martin Danišík publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Martin Danišík between 2005 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Martin Danišík published across 22 years, from 2005 to 2026, averaging 12.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2021. 19 of the 269 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2021. 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 31 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 28 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 18 publications 2026: 1 publication
2005 2026

269 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Martin Danišík: publications per year, 2005 to 2026
Year Publications
2005 3
2006 3
2007 3
2008 9
2009 6
2010 9
2011 5
2012 10
2013 6
2014 5
2015 11
2016 13
2017 20
2018 13
2019 19
2020 21
2021 31
2022 13
2023 28
2024 22
2025 18
2026 1
Total 269
Download as CSV

Martin Danišík publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Danišík sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 258–267 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 260 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185 260
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Martin Danišík D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Danišík sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296 40
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Martin Danišík is a researcher affiliated with Curtin University in Australia, specializing in Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their work primarily focuses on several subfields including Geophysics, Atmospheric Science, Artificial Intelligence, Geology, and Paleontology.

The scientist's research encompasses a range of topics such as Geological and Geochemical Analysis, earthquake and tectonic studies, Geology and Paleoclimatology Research, Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping, High-pressure geophysics and materials, Geological Studies and Exploration, and Geological and Geophysical Studies.

Martin Danišík has contributed to several recent publications, including:

  • "(U-Th)/He chronology: Part 2. Considerations for evaluating, integrating, and interpreting conventional individual aliquot data", 2022, Geological Society of America Bulletin
  • "(U-Th)/He chronology: Part 1. Data, uncertainty, and reporting", 2022, Geological Society of America Bulletin
  • "The connection between the Alps and the Carpathians beneath the Pannonian Basin: Selective reactivation of Alpine nappe contacts during Miocene extension", 2020, Global and Planetary Change
  • "Sub-millennial eruptive recurrence in the silicic Mangaone Subgroup tephra sequence, New Zealand, from Bayesian modelling of zircon double-dating and radiocarbon ages", 2020, Quaternary Science Reviews
  • "A history of violence: magma incubation, timing and tephra distribution of the Los Chocoyos supereruption (Atitlán Caldera, Guatemala)", 2021, Journal of Quaternary Science

The researcher has frequently published in journals such as the Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, Quaternary Science Reviews, Ore Geology Reviews, Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America, and the Geological Society of America Bulletin.

Collaboration forms a significant aspect of Martin Danišík's work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Axel K. Schmitt
  • Christopher L. Kirkland
  • Noreen J. Evans
  • Bjarne Friedrichs
  • Julie Schindlbeck-Belo

The combination of expertise in multiple specialized topics along with a solid record of peer-reviewed publications and collaborations highlights Martin Danišík's role within the scientific community focused on Earth and Planetary Sciences.

Best Publications

  • Rapid incision of the Mekong River in the middle Miocene linked to monsoonal precipitation

    Junsheng Nie;Gregory Ruetenik;Kerry Gallagher;Gregory Hoke

  • Seeing is believing: Visualization of He distribution in zircon and implications for thermal history reconstruction on single crystals

    Martin Danišík;Brent I. A. McInnes;Christopher L. Kirkland;Christopher L. Kirkland;Christopher L. Kirkland;Brad J. McDonald

  • Re-anchoring the late Pleistocene tephrochronology of New Zealand based on concordant radiocarbon ages and combined 238U/230Th disequilibrium and (U–Th)/He zircon ages

    Martin Danišík;Martin Danišík;Phil A.R. Shane;Axel K. Schmitt;Alan G. Hogg

  • Zircon geochronology and geochemistry to constrain the youngest eruption events and magma evolution of the Mid-Miocene ignimbrite flare-up in the Pannonian Basin, eastern central Europe

    Réka Lukács;Réka Lukács;Szabolcs Harangi;Olivier Bachmann;Marcel Guillong

  • Contrasting styles of (U)HP rock exhumation along the Cenozoic Adria-Europe plate boundary (Western Alps, Calabria, Corsica)

    Marco G. Malusà;Claudio Faccenna;Suzanne L. Baldwin;Paul G. Fitzgerald

  • Identifying the volcanic eruption depicted in a neolithic painting at Çatalhöyük, Central Anatolia, Turkey.

    Axel K. Schmitt;Martin Danišík;Erkan Aydar;Erdal Şen

  • Constraining long-term denudation and faulting history in intraplate regions by multisystem thermochronology: An example of the Sudetic Marginal Fault (Bohemian Massif, central Europe)

    Martin Danišík;Martin Danišík;Petra Štěpančíková;Noreen J. Evans;Noreen J. Evans

  • Acigöl rhyolite field, Central Anatolia (part 1): high-resolution dating of eruption episodes and zircon growth rates

    Axel K. Schmitt;Martin Danišík;Martin Danišík;Noreen J. Evans;Noreen J. Evans;Wolfgang Siebel

  • Prolonged mantle residence of zircon xenocrysts from the western Eger rift

    Wolfgang Siebel;Axel K. Schmitt;Martin Danišík;Fukun Chen

  • Application of combined U-Th-disequilibrium/U-Pb and (U-Th)/He zircon dating to tephrochronology

    Martin Danišík;Axel K. Schmitt;Axel K. Schmitt;Daniel F. Stockli;Oscar M. Lovera

  • Thermal history of the central Gotthard and Aar massifs, European Alps: Evidence for steady state, long-term exhumation

    C. Glotzbach;C. Glotzbach;J. Reinecker;Martin Danisik;M. Rahn

  • Differential Exhumation and Crustal Tilting in the Easternmost Tianshan (Xinjiang, China), Revealed by Low-Temperature Thermochronology

    J. Gillespie;S. Glorie;G. Jepson;Z. Y. Zhang

  • Apatite and titanite from the Karrat Group, Greenland; implications for charting the thermal evolution of crust from the U-Pb geochronology of common Pb bearing phases

    Chris Kirkland;Chris Kirkland;Julie Hollis;Martin Danisik;J. Petersen

  • Thermochronological constraints on the long-term erosional history of the Karkonosze Mts., Central Europe

    Martin Danišík;Martin Danišík;Piotr Migoń;Joachim Kuhlemann;Noreen J. Evans;Noreen J. Evans

  • Burial and exhumation of Corsica (France) in the light of fission track data

    Martin Danišík;Joachim Kuhlemann;István Dunkl;Balázs Székely

  • Neogene exhumation history of the Mont Blanc massif, western Alps

    C. Glotzbach;J. Reinecker;Martin Danišík;M. Rahn

  • Multi-system geochronological and isotopic constraints on age and evolution of the Gaoligongshan metamorphic belt and shear zone system in western Yunnan, China

    Sümeyya Eroğlu;Wolfgang Siebel;Martin Danišík;Jörg A. Pfänder

  • Grain size matters: Implications for element and isotopic mobility in titanite

    Christopher L. Kirkland;Christopher L. Kirkland;C.V. Spaggiari;T. E. Johnson;Robert H. Smithies

  • Tracking the Adriatic-slab travel beneath the Tethyan margin of Corsica–Sardinia by low-temperature thermochronometry

    Marco G. Malusà;Martin Danišík;Joachim Kuhlemann

  • Tectonic control on the late stage exhumation of the Aar Massif (Switzerland): Constraints from apatite fission track and (U‐Th)/He data

    John Reinecker;Martin Danišík;Claudia Schmid;Christoph Glotzbach

Frequent Co-Authors

Noreen J. Evans
Noreen J. Evans Curtin University
Axel K. Schmitt
Axel K. Schmitt Curtin University
Christopher L. Kirkland
Christopher L. Kirkland Curtin University
István Dunkl
István Dunkl University of Göttingen
Wolfgang Frisch
Wolfgang Frisch University of Tübingen
Stijn Glorie
Stijn Glorie University of Adelaide
Joachim Kuhlemann
Joachim Kuhlemann University of Tübingen
Fred Jourdan
Fred Jourdan Curtin University
Alan S. Collins
Alan S. Collins University of Adelaide
Peter J.J. Kamp
Peter J.J. Kamp University of Waikato

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science opens doors to a variety of interdisciplinary career paths. For those interested in the administrative side of science and education, pursuing a human resource management masters degree online can improve skills in managing teams and organizational structures within environmental agencies or research institutions.

Additionally, many seniors consider returning to school to upgrade their qualifications or explore new fields. The article on degrees for seniors highlights accessible online options that fit diverse lifestyles, making Earth Science or related areas increasingly attainable for learners at any stage.

For students passionate about information management and archives relevant to Earth Science, considering programs discussed in ala accredited schools ensures quality education in library and information science. These programs prepare graduates for careers in research libraries or data curation centers.

Wondering if a specialized degree might complement your Earth Science background? Exploring insights from is a library science degree worth it can help clarify how information science skills enhance research capabilities and employability.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Danišík

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles