World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 32 8773 8152 17 16 134 3216

Tomáš Pánek publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tomáš Pánek between 2000 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tomáš Pánek published across 27 years, from 2000 to 2026, averaging 6 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2016. 7 of the 163 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2016. 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 6 publications 2026: 1 publication
2000 2026

163 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tomáš Pánek: publications per year, 2000 to 2026
Year Publications
2000 2
2001 1
2002 1
2003 0
2004 2
2005 0
2006 2
2007 4
2008 5
2009 5
2010 10
2011 6
2012 5
2013 10
2014 11
2015 10
2016 19
2017 7
2018 8
2019 6
2020 6
2021 8
2022 10
2023 4
2024 14
2025 6
2026 1
Total 163
Download as CSV

Tomáš Pánek publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tomáš Pánek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 128–137 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 134 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557 134
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Tomáš Pánek D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tomáš Pánek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278 32
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Tomáš Pánek is affiliated with the University of Ostrava in the Czech Republic and focuses on research within Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Environmental Science. Their scholarly work covers multiple subfields, notably Atmospheric Science, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Geophysics, Global and Planetary Change, and Ecology.

The principal topics of their research include:

  • Landslides and related hazards
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
  • Geological Formations and Processes Exploration
  • Earthquake and tectonic studies

Tomáš Pánek has contributed extensively to academic publications, particularly in several key venues such as Geomorphology, Landslides, Earth-Science Reviews, Quaternary Science Reviews, and The ISME Journal. They have published 12 papers in Geomorphology, 4 in Landslides, and contributed to other journals with multiple works as well.

Recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Tomáš Pánek include:

  • "Recent technological and methodological advances for the investigation of landslide dams," 2021, Earth-Science Reviews
  • "Revisiting biocrystallization: purine crystalline inclusions are widespread in eukaryotes," 2022, The ISME Journal
  • "Post-LGM faulting in Central Europe: LiDAR detection of the >50 km-long Sub-Tatra fault, Western Carpathians," 2020, Geomorphology
  • "Deep learning reveals one of Earth's largest landslide terrain in Patagonia," 2022, Earth and Planetary Science Letters
  • "Complex causes of landslides after ice sheet retreat: Post-LGM mass movements in the Northern Patagonian Icefield region," 2020, The Science of The Total Environment

The scientist collaborates frequently with several co-authors including Michal Břežný, Diego Winocur, Karel Šilhán, Oliver Korup, and Elisabeth Schönfeldt, reflecting a network of research partnerships across their fields of study.

Best Publications

  • Recent progress in landslide dating A global overview

    Tomáš Pánek

  • Temporal behavior of deep-seated gravitational slope deformations: A review

    Tomáš Pánek;Jan Klimeš

  • Gravitationally induced caves and other discontinuities detected by 2D electrical resistivity tomography: Case studies from the Polish Flysch Carpathians

    Tomáš Pánek;Włodzimierz Margielewski;Petr Tábořík;Jan Urban

  • Catastrophic slope failure and its origins: Case of the May 2010 Girova Mountain long-runout rockslide (Czech Republic)

    Tomáš Pánek;Karel Šilhán;Petr Tábořík;Jan Hradecký

  • Deep-seated gravitational slope deformations in the highest parts of the Czech Flysch Carpathians: Evolutionary model based on kinematic analysis, electrical imaging and trenching

    Tomáš Pánek;Petr Tábořík;Jan Klimeš;Veronika Komárková

  • Rainfall-induced landslide event of May 2010 in the eastern part of the Czech Republic

    Tomáš Pánek;Rudolf Brázdil;Jan Klimeš;Veronika Smolková

  • Recent technological and methodological advances for the investigation of landslide dams

    Xuanmei Fan;Anja Dufresne;Jim Whiteley;Jim Whiteley;Ali P. Yunus

  • Holocene reactivations of catastrophic complex flow-like landslides in the Flysch Carpathians (Czech Republic/Slovakia)

    Tomáš Pánek;Veronika Smolková;Jan Hradecký;Ivo Baroň

  • Complex landslide terrain in the Kamienne Mountains, Middle Sudetes, SW Poland.

    Piotr Migoń;Tomáš Pánek;Ireneusz Malik;Jan Hrádecký

  • Tree-ring analysis in the reconstruction of slope instabilities associated with earthquakes and precipitation (the Crimean Mountains, Ukraine)

    Karel Šilhán;Tomáš Pánek;Jan Hradecký

  • Investigation of recent catastrophic landslides in the flysch belt of Outer Western Carpathians (Czech Republic): progress towards better hazard assessment

    J. Klimeš;I. Baroň;T. Pánek;T. Kosačík

  • Geomorphological, pedological and dendrochronological signatures of a relict landslide terrain, Mt Garbatka (Kamienne Mts), SW Poland

    Piotr Migoń;Andrzej Kacprzak;Ireneusz Malik;Marek Kasprzak

  • Deep-seated gravitational slope deformations and their influence on consequent mass movements (case studies from the highest part of the Czech Carpathians)

    Jan Hradecký;Tomáš Pánek

  • Fossil and recent debris flows in medium-high mountains (Moravskoslezské Beskydy Mts, Czech Republic).

    Karel Šilhán;Tomáš Pánek

  • Late Holocene catastrophic slope collapse affected by deep-seated gravitational deformation in flysch: Ropice Mountain, Czech Republic

    Tomáš Pánek;Jan Hradecký;Jozef Minár;Jozef Minár;Oldrich Hungr

  • Landslides and Quaternary climate changes—The state of the art

    Tomáš Pánek

  • The largest prehistoric landslide in northwestern Slovakia: Chronological constraints of the Kykula long-runout landslide and related dammed lakes

    Tomáš Pánek;Jan Hradecký;Veronika Smolková;Karel Šilhán

  • Spatio-temporal patterns of recurrent slope instabilities affecting undercut slopes in flysch: A dendrogeomorphic approach using broad-leaved trees

    Karel Šilhán;Tomáš Pánek;Ondřej Turský;Rudolf Brázdil

  • Large landslides and deep-seated gravitational slope deformations in the Czech Flysch Carpathians: New LiDAR-based inventory

    Tomáš Pánek;Michal Břežný;Veronika Kapustová;Jan Lenart

  • The dating of bedrock landslide reactivations using dendrogeomorphic techniques The Mazak landslide, Outer Western Carpathians Czech Republic

    Karel Šilhán;Tomáš Pánek;Radek Dušek;Daniel Havlů

  • Landscapes and Landforms of the Czech Republic

    Tomáš Pánek;Jan Hradecký

  • Rainfall-induced landslide event of May 2010 in the eastern part of the Czech Republic - case study of the recurrent Girová landslide

    J. Hradecký;T. Pánek;R. Brázdil;K. Šilhán

Frequent Co-Authors

Julius Lukeš
Julius Lukeš Czech Academy of Sciences
Andrew J. Roger
Andrew J. Roger Dalhousie University
Rudolf Brázdil
Rudolf Brázdil Czech Academy of Sciences
Oliver Korup
Oliver Korup University of Potsdam
Régis Braucher
Régis Braucher Aix-Marseille University
Michael W. Gray
Michael W. Gray Dalhousie University
B. Franz Lang
B. Franz Lang University of Montreal
Alastair G. B. Simpson
Alastair G. B. Simpson Dalhousie University
Martin Danišík
Martin Danišík Curtin University
Markus Stoffel
Markus Stoffel University of Geneva

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students exploring Earth Science in the USA, branching into related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Degrees like library science offer valuable expertise in information management, essential for organizing vast scientific data and research. Exploring a library science masters can provide skills applicable in academic and environmental research libraries.

Additionally, careers blending science and technology often benefit from specializations in digital media. Students interested in visual documentation of environmental changes might consider online photography degrees, which teach techniques critical for scientific imaging and fieldwork presentation.

Veterans looking for flexible paths should explore targeted programs like online photography degree programs for veterans, designed to accommodate their unique experiences and scheduling needs.

For those interested in library and information science, the ala mlis programs represent some of the top accredited options, ensuring quality education that supports careers in data curation and research management aligned with Earth Science professions.

Best Scientists Citing Tomáš Pánek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles