World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 58 3444 3163 1359 1213 159 11568

Rima McLeod publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rima McLeod between 1969 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rima McLeod published across 57 years, from 1969 to 2025, averaging 3.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2006. 6 of the 217 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1969 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2006. 1969: 1 publication 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 3 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 5 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 2 publications
1969 2025

217 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rima McLeod: publications per year, 1969 to 2025
Year Publications
1969 1
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 2
1978 2
1979 1
1980 1
1981 1
1982 3
1983 2
1984 2
1985 5
1986 1
1987 0
1988 2
1989 2
1990 2
1991 3
1992 3
1993 4
1994 7
1995 2
1996 7
1997 0
1998 3
1999 4
2000 3
2001 2
2002 4
2003 5
2004 2
2005 6
2006 11
2007 11
2008 6
2009 4
2010 7
2011 10
2012 9
2013 6
2014 10
2015 6
2016 11
2017 7
2018 8
2019 4
2020 5
2021 8
2022 1
2023 5
2024 4
2025 2
Total 217
Download as CSV

Rima McLeod publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rima McLeod sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 155–164 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 159 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264 159
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Rima McLeod D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rima McLeod sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162 58
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Rima McLeod is affiliated with the University of Chicago in the United States and has contributed extensively to fields surrounding immunology, microbiology, and medicine. Their research primarily focuses on parasitology and epidemiology, with notable work in molecular biology, virology, and public health.

Their research interests encompass diverse topics such as:

  • Toxoplasma gondii research studies
  • Herpesvirus infections and treatments
  • Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research
  • Rabies epidemiology and control
  • Hepatitis B virus studies
  • Neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms
  • Tryptophan and brain disorders

McLeod's publication record includes research articles in various scientific journals. Selected recent papers include:

  • Potent Tetrahydroquinolone Eliminates Apicomplexan Parasites, 2020, Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
  • Engineering and characterization of a novel Self Assembling Protein for Toxoplasma peptide vaccine in HLA-A*11:01, HLA-A*02:01 and HLA-B*07:02 transgenic mice, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • A fresh look at the role of spiramycin in preventing a neglected disease: meta-analyses of observational studies, 2021, European Journal of Medical Research
  • High performance of a novel point-of-care blood test for Toxoplasma infection in women from diverse regions of Morocco, 2021, Emerging Microbes & Infections
  • Epidemiological Aspects of Maternal and Congenital Toxoplasmosis in Panama, 2021, Pathogens

Frequently publishing in journals such as Scientific Reports, Journal of Infection and Public Health, Microorganisms, and Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, McLeod has contributed multiple papers over time.

Collaborations have involved coauthors who frequently work with McLeod, including:

  • Ying Zhou
  • Joseph Lykins
  • Kamal El Bissati
  • Jorge Enrique Gómez-Marín
  • Stuart Woods

Their work demonstrates an interdisciplinary approach, engaging with laboratory research, epidemiological analysis, and public health implications, particularly in the context of infections caused by parasitic organisms and viruses.

Best Publications

  • Evidence for the shikimate pathway in apicomplexan parasites

    Fiona Roberts;Fiona Roberts;Craig W. Roberts;Jennifer J. Johnson;Dennis E. Kyle

  • Early and Longitudinal Evaluations of Treated Infants and Children and Untreated Historical Patients with Congenital Toxoplasmosis: The Chicago Collaborative Treatment Trial

    James McAuley;Kenneth M. Boyer;Dushyant Patel;Marilyn Mets

  • Outcome of treatment for congenital toxoplasmosis, 1981-2004: the National Collaborative Chicago-Based, Congenital Toxoplasmosis Study.

    Rima McLeod;Kenneth Boyer;Theodore Karrison;Kristen Kasza

  • Fatty acid and sterol metabolism: potential antimicrobial targets in apicomplexan and trypanosomatid parasitic protozoa

    C.W. Roberts;R. McLeod;D.W. Rice;Michael L. Ginger

  • Costs of major parasites to the Australian livestock industries

    R.S. Mcleod

  • Risk factors for Toxoplasma gondii infection in mothers of infants with congenital toxoplasmosis: Implications for prenatal management and screening.

    Kenneth M Boyer;Kenneth M Boyer;Ellen Holfels;Nancy Roizen;Charles Swisher

  • Toxoplasma gondii tachyzoite–bradyzoite interconversion

    Russell E Lyons;Rima McLeod;Craig W Roberts

  • The One Health Approach to Toxoplasmosis: Epidemiology, Control, and Prevention Strategies

    A. Alonso Aguirre;Travis Longcore;Michelle Barbieri;Haydee Dabritz

  • Neurological and behavioral abnormalities, ventricular dilatation, altered cellular functions, inflammation, and neuronal injury in brains of mice due to common, persistent, parasitic infection

    Gretchen Hermes;James W Ajioka;Krystyna A Kelly;Ernest J Mui

  • Triclosan inhibits the growth of Plasmodium falciparum and Toxoplasma gondii by inhibition of apicomplexan Fab I.

    Rima McLeod;Stephen P Muench;John B Rafferty;Dennis E Kyle

  • Class I MHC genes and CD8+ T cells determine cyst number in Toxoplasma gondii infection.

    C R Brown;R McLeod

  • The shikimate pathway and its branches in apicomplexan parasites.

    Craig W. Roberts;Fiona Roberts;Russell E. Lyons;Michael J. Kirisits

  • Antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii major surface protein (SAG-1, P30) inhibit infection of host cells and are produced in murine intestine after peroral infection.

    J R Mineo;R McLeod;D Mack;J Smith

  • Evolutionary origins of the eukaryotic shikimate pathway: gene fusions, horizontal gene transfer, and endosymbiotic replacements.

    Thomas A. Richards;Joel B. Dacks;Samantha A. Campbell;Jeffrey L. Blanchard

  • NALP1 Influences Susceptibility to Human Congenital Toxoplasmosis, Proinflammatory Cytokine Response, and Fate of Toxoplasma gondii-Infected Monocytic Cells

    William H. Witola;Ernest Mui;Aubrey Hargrave;Susan Liu

  • DEFINITIVE IDENTIFICATION OF A GENE THAT CONFERS RESISTANCE AGAINST TOXOPLASMA CYST BURDEN AND ENCEPHALITIS

    C. R. Brown;C. A. Hunter;R. G. Estes;E. Beckmann

  • Unrecognized Ingestion of Toxoplasma gondii Oocysts Leads to Congenital Toxoplasmosis and Causes Epidemics in North America

    Kenneth Boyer;Dolores Hill;Ernest Mui;Kristen Wroblewski

  • Prematurity and Severity Are Associated With Toxoplasma gondii Alleles (NCCCTS, 1981–2009)

    Rima McLeod;Kenneth M. Boyer;Daniel Lee;Ernest Mui

  • Pregnancy, delivery, and pouch function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis.

    A. Ravid;C. S. Richard;L. M. Spencer;B. I. O’Connor

  • Crohn's disease and pregnancy.

    K. Woolfson;K. Woolfson;Z. Cohen;Z. Cohen;R. S. McLeod;R. S. McLeod

  • Congenital toxoplasmosis transmitted from an immunologically competent mother infected before conception

    Nicolas Vogel;Michael Kirisits;Eric Michael;Howard Bach

  • Severe congenital toxoplasmosis in the United States: clinical and serologic findings in untreated infants.

    Tudor Rares Olariu;Jack S. Remington;Rima McLeod;Ambereen Alam

  • IDENTIFICATION OF A SPOROZOITE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN FROM TOXOPLASMA GONDII

    Dolores Hill;Cathleen Coss;J. P. Dubey;Kristen Wroblewski

  • Growth of Toxoplasma gondii is inhibited by aryloxyphenoxypropionate herbicides targeting acetyl-CoA carboxylase

    E. Zuther;J. J. Johnson;R. Haselkorn;R. McLeod

  • Role of specific immunoglobulin E in diagnosis of acute toxoplasma infection and toxoplasmosis.

    Sin Yew Wong;M.-P. Hajdu;R. Ramirez;P. Thulliez

Frequent Co-Authors

Craig W. Roberts
Craig W. Roberts University of Strathclyde
David W. Rice
David W. Rice University of Sheffield
Jack S. Remington
Jack S. Remington Stanford University
Theodore Karrison
Theodore Karrison University of Chicago
Wilbur K. Milhous
Wilbur K. Milhous Clemson University
Jitender P. Dubey
Jitender P. Dubey Agricultural Research Service
Jose G. Montoya
Jose G. Montoya Stanford University
Jenefer M. Blackwell
Jenefer M. Blackwell Telethon Kids Institute
Dennis E. Kyle
Dennis E. Kyle University of Georgia
Alessandro Sette
Alessandro Sette La Jolla Institute For Allergy & Immunology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Microbiology in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities, many of which are complemented by specialized certifications and degrees. For those interested in integrating patient care with a holistic approach, becoming a functional medicine np offers a promising pathway. This role emphasizes understanding chronic conditions from a systems biology perspective, aligning well with microbiological knowledge.

On the administrative front, careers like medical coding are critical to healthcare operations. Earning a certified professional coder certification can enhance employability in this field, ensuring accurate translation of medical diagnoses and treatments into standardized codes.

Health information management is another growing sector that benefits from expertise in biological sciences. Understanding data related to diseases and treatments can be invaluable. If interested, exploring health information management jobs salary provides insight into potential earnings and opportunities in this domain. Additionally, selecting the best online health information management degree cahiim accredited programs can ensure a reputable education while studying remotely.

By combining microbiology with these related online degrees and certifications, students can diversify their skillsets and strengthen their positions in the competitive healthcare job market.

Best Scientists Citing Rima McLeod

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles