World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
52
Citations
8099
World Ranking
16841
National Ranking
1326

Mary B. Davis publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary B. Davis sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 130 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Mary B. Davis D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary B. Davis sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mary B. Davis is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom, with a research focus across medicine and health professions. Their work extends into several subfields, notably Emergency Medical Services, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Emergency Medicine, Epidemiology, and General Health Professions.

The research topics covered by Davis include:

  • Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
  • Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
  • Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation

The researcher has contributed to various scientific venues, with frequent publications in:

  • Journal of the Association for Vascular Access
  • Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
  • American Journal of Infection Control
  • Pain Management Nursing
  • Nutrition in Clinical Practice

Among recent publications by Mary B. Davis are:

  • "Creating an Organizational Culture and Climate of Meaningful Recognition for Nurse Managers," 2023, JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration
  • "Characteristics, Comorbidities, and Data Gaps for Coronavirus Disease Deaths, Tennessee, USA," 2021, Emerging Infectious Diseases
  • "Prevention of complications for hospitalized patients receiving parenteral nutrition: A narrative review," 2024, Nutrition in Clinical Practice
  • "Risk of Patient Harm Related to Unnecessary Dilution of Ready-to-Administer Prefilled Syringes," 2020, Journal of Infusion Nursing
  • "An international survey of pediatric and neonatal clinicians' vascular access practice: PediSIG assessment of vascular access, education, and support (PAVES) catheter selection," 2020, British Journal of Nursing

The list of frequent coauthors includes:

  • Riad Rahhal
  • Amanda Ullman
  • M. Lindell Joseph
  • Deb Zimmermann
  • Tacia Bullard

Best Publications

  • Characterization of PLA2G6 as a locus for dystonia-parkinsonism.

    Coro Paisan-Ruiz;Kailash P. Bhatia;Kailash P. Bhatia;Abi Li;Dena Hernandez

  • Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease: frequency of genetic subtypes and guidelines for genetic testing

    Sinead M Murphy;Matilde Laura;Katherine Fawcett;Amelie Pandraud

  • Mutations in the gene LRRK2 encoding dardarin (PARK8) cause familial Parkinson's disease: clinical, pathological, olfactory and functional imaging and genetic data.

    Naheed L. Khan;Shushant Jain;John M. Lynch;Nicola Pavese

  • The phenotypic manifestations of chromosome 17p11.2 duplication.

    P. K. Thomas;W. Marques;M. B. Davis;M. G. Sweeney

  • Dravet syndrome as epileptic encephalopathy: evidence from long-term course and neuropathology

    Claudia B. Catarino;Joan Y.W. Liu;Ioannis Liagkouras;Vaneesha S. Gibbons

  • Voltage sensor charge loss accounts for most cases of hypokalemic periodic paralysis.

    E. Matthews;R. Labrum;M. G. Sweeney;R. Sud

  • Mutations in TTBK2, encoding a kinase implicated in tau phosphorylation, segregate with spinocerebellar ataxia type 11.

    Henry Houlden;Janel Johnson;Christopher Gardner-Thorpe;Tammaryn Lashley

  • Autosomal-dominant GTPCH1-deficient DRD: clinical characteristics and long-term outcome of 34 patients

    Iris Trender-Gerhard;Mary G Sweeney;Petra Schwingenschuh;Pablo Mir

  • Mutations in the autoregulatory domain of β-tubulin 4a cause hereditary dystonia

    Joshua Hersheson;Niccolo E. Mencacci;Niccolo E. Mencacci;Mary Davis;Nicola MacDonald

  • Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia type III: linkage in a large British family to a 7.6-cM region on chromosome 15q14-21.3.

    P.F. Worth;P. Giunti;C. Gardner-Thorpe;P.H. Dixon

  • PARK6-linked parkinsonism occurs in several European families.

    Enza Maria Valente;Francesco Brancati;Alessandro Ferraris;Elizabeth A. Graham

  • A second paroxysmal kinesigenic choreoathetosis locus (EKD2) mapping on 16q13-q22.1 indicates a family of genes which give rise to paroxysmal disorders on human chromosome 16.

    E M Valente;S D Spacey;G M Wali;K P Bhatia

  • Prenatal diagnosis of mitochondrial DNA8993 T----G disease.

    A E Harding;I J Holt;M G Sweeney;M Brockington

  • Large, expanded repeats in SCA8 are not confined to patients with cerebellar ataxia.

    Paul F. Worth;Henry Houlden;Paola Giunti;Mary B. Davis

  • Huntington's disease phenocopies are clinically and genetically heterogeneous

    Edward J. Wild;Ese E. Mudanohwo;Mary G. Sweeney;Susanne A. Schneider

  • Prevalence study of genetically defined skeletal muscle channelopathies in England

    Alejandro Horga;Dipa L. Raja Rayan;Emma Matthews;Richa Sud

  • The role of the SCA2 trinucleotide repeat expansion in 89 autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia families. Frequency, clinical and genetic correlates.

    P Giunti;G Sabbadini;Mg Sweeney;Mb Davis

  • Somatic and germline mosaicism in sporadic early-onset Alzheimer's disease

    Jonathan A. Beck;Mark Poulter;Tracy A. Campbell;James B. Uphill

  • Acetazolamide efficacy in hypokalemic periodic paralysis and the predictive role of genotype

    E. Matthews;S. Portaro;Q. Ke;R. Sud

  • Transthyretin gene analysis in European patients with suspected familial amyloid polyneuropathy

    M.M. Reilly;D. Adams;D.R. Booth;M.B. Davis

Frequent Co-Authors

Nicholas W. Wood
Nicholas W. Wood University College London
Michael G. Hanna
Michael G. Hanna University College London
Mary M. Reilly
Mary M. Reilly University College London
Kailash P. Bhatia
Kailash P. Bhatia University College London
Paola Giunti
Paola Giunti University College London
Henry Houlden
Henry Houlden University College London
Tamas Revesz
Tamas Revesz University College London
Sarah J. Tabrizi
Sarah J. Tabrizi University College London
Enza Maria Valente
Enza Maria Valente University of Pavia
Charles David Marsden
Charles David Marsden King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degree options and specialized career paths. Many students explore healthcare, research, or administrative roles, and may benefit from accelerated or flexible online programs.

Those interested in mental health can consider psychiatric np programs, which offer advanced clinical training delivered online. For students focused on wellness or preventative care, pursuing a fast track nutrition degree allows for quicker entry into the workforce.

Aspiring healthcare leaders may compare options for an online healthcare mba cost, helping them balance quality education with affordability. If you’re interested in medical coding and data, it’s valuable to understand ccs vs cpc— two leading certifications that impact salary and job prospects in health information management.

Online degrees and targeted certifications make it easier for Biology and Biochemistry graduates to diversify their career pathways, meet evolving industry demands, and achieve professional growth in related healthcare fields.

Best Scientists Citing Mary B. Davis

Trending Scientists