World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
33
Citations
7075
World Ranking
893
National Ranking
37

Simon Niemeyer publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Simon Niemeyer sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 74 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Simon Niemeyer D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Simon Niemeyer sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Simon Niemeyer is affiliated with the University of Canberra in Australia. Their research primarily spans the field of Social Sciences, with a focus on subfields including Sociology and Political Science, Molecular Biology, Communication, Political Science and International Relations, and Business and International Management.

The research topics Niemeyer addresses include:

  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
  • Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • E-Government and Public Services
  • Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence

They have contributed to several academic publications with selected recent papers as follows:

  • "Global citizen deliberation on genome editing" (2020), published in Science
  • "Deliberative democracy in the age of serial crisis" (2020), published in International Political Science Review
  • "How Deliberation Happens: Enabling Deliberative Reason" (2023), published in American Political Science Review
  • "Heritable Human Genome Editing: The Public Engagement Imperative" (2020), published in The CRISPR Journal
  • "Psychological Mechanisms of Deliberative Transformation: The Role of Group Identity" (2020), published in Journal of Deliberative Democracy

Niemeyer has published a book titled Deliberative Mini-Publics: Core Design Features in 2021 through KU Leuven, which has received notable academic attention.

Frequent collaborators in Niemeyer's research include:

  • John S. Dryzek
  • Nicole Curato
  • Dianne Nicol
  • André Bächtiger
  • Francesco Veri

Their work appears in diverse publication venues, notably:

  • Science
  • American Political Science Review
  • International Political Science Review
  • The CRISPR Journal
  • Cambridge Prisms Precision Medicine

Best Publications

  • Disentangling Diversity in Deliberative Democracy: Competing Theories, their Blind Spots, and Complementarities

    André Bächtiger;Simon Niemeyer;Michael Neblo;Marco R. Steenbergen

  • Reconciling Pluralism and Consensus as Political Ideals

    John S. Dryzek;Simon Niemeyer

  • The crisis of democracy and the science of deliberation.

    John S. Dryzek;André Bächtiger;Simone Chambers;Joshua Cohen

  • Discursive Representation

    Unknown

  • On the use of imagery for climate change engagement

    Saffron J. O’Neill;Maxwell Boykoff;Simon Niemeyer;Sophie A. Day

  • Twelve Key Findings in Deliberative Democracy Research

    Nicole Curato;John S. Dryzek;Selen A. Ercan;Carolyn M. Hendriks

  • When Does Deliberation Begin? Internal Reflection versus Public Discussion in Deliberative Democracy:

    Robert E. Goodin;Simon J. Niemeyer

  • The Emancipatory Effect of Deliberation: Empirical Lessons from Mini-Publics

    Simon Niemeyer

  • The Ends of Deliberation: Meta‐consensus and Inter‐subjective Rationality as Ideal Outcomes

    Simon Niemeyer;John S. Dryzek

  • Health risk communication and amplification: learning from the MMR vaccination controversy

    Judith Petts;Simon Niemeyer

  • Deliberation in the Wilderness: Displacing Symbolic Politics

    Simon Niemeyer

  • Adaptation policy and community discourse: risk, vulnerability, and just transformation

    David Schlosberg;Lisette B. Collins;Simon Niemeyer

  • “What sceptics believe”: The effects of information and deliberation on climate change scepticism

    Kersty Hobson;Simon Niemeyer

  • Rapid climate change and society: assessing responses and thresholds.

    Simon Niemeyer;Judith Petts;Kersty Hobson

  • Environmental Valuation Analysis, Public Deliberation, and their Pragmatic Syntheses: A Critical Appraisal

    Simon Niemeyer;Clive L Spash

  • Public responses to climate change: The role of deliberation in building capacity for adaptive action

    Kersty Hobson;Simon Niemeyer

  • Informed consent in biobank research: a deliberative approach to the debate.

    David M. Secko;Nina Preto;Simon Niemeyer;Michael M. Burgess

  • Improving deliberative participation: connecting mini-publics to deliberative systems

    Andrea Felicetti;Simon Niemeyer;Nicole Curato

  • Global citizen deliberation on genome editing

    John S. Dryzek;Dianne Nicol;Simon Niemeyer;Sonya Pemberton

  • Democracy and Climate Change: What Can Deliberative Democracy Contribute?

    Simon Niemeyer

  • Deliberative democracy and climate governance.

    John S. Dryzek;Simon Niemeyer

  • Deliberative Democracy: An Introduction

    André Bächtiger;Marco R. Steenbergen;Simon Niemeyer

  • Scaling up Deliberation to Mass Publics: Harnessing Minipublics in a Deliberative System

    Simon Niemeyer

  • Democracy and Climate Change: What Can Deliberative Democracy Contribute?’, Australian Journal of Politics and History , .

    SJ Niemeyer

Frequent Co-Authors

John S. Dryzek
John S. Dryzek University of Canberra
Michael A. Neblo
Michael A. Neblo The Ohio State University
André Bächtiger
André Bächtiger University of Stuttgart
David M. Farrell
David M. Farrell University College Dublin
Archon Fung
Archon Fung Harvard University
Marco R. Steenbergen
Marco R. Steenbergen University of Zurich
Jane Mansbridge
Jane Mansbridge Harvard University
Mark E. Warren
Mark E. Warren University of British Columbia
James N. Druckman
James N. Druckman University of Rochester
Judith Petts
Judith Petts University of Birmingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Political Science opens doors to a variety of rewarding online programs and career options in the USA. If you are interested in broadening your expertise, consider enrolling in online ma history programs. These degrees often complement political science knowledge with deeper context in policy and historical trends.

For those seeking quicker educational advancement, you might benefit from the quickest masters degree online options. These accelerated paths can help you progress faster into leadership or analyst roles. If budget is a priority, check out cheap online colleges for more cost-effective ways to earn your degree without compromising educational quality.

Enhancing your credentials doesn’t always require a full degree—there are easy certifications that pay well and can quickly boost your employability in public administration, nonprofit work, or policy analysis. Whether seeking advanced study or quick career benefits, diverse online options make it easier than ever to tailor your pathway in political science.

Best Scientists Citing Simon Niemeyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles