World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Political Science
Canada
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 43 400 357 14 14 133 13749

Mark E. Warren publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark E. Warren between 1977 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark E. Warren published across 50 years, from 1977 to 2026, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2006. 2 of the 163 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2006. 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 4 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 5 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 9 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 1 publication 2026: 1 publication
1977 2026

163 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark E. Warren: publications per year, 1977 to 2026
Year Publications
1977 1
1978 0
1979 0
1980 1
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 3
1985 4
1986 1
1987 2
1988 5
1989 5
1990 1
1991 1
1992 4
1993 2
1994 2
1995 4
1996 2
1997 2
1998 1
1999 5
2000 1
2001 3
2002 3
2003 3
2004 4
2005 1
2006 9
2007 2
2008 9
2009 4
2010 2
2011 6
2012 6
2013 3
2014 8
2015 4
2016 4
2017 7
2018 6
2019 5
2020 5
2021 5
2022 3
2023 6
2024 5
2025 1
2026 1
Total 163
Download as CSV

Mark E. Warren publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark E. Warren sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–135 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 133 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73
131–135 64 133
136–140 45
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Mark E. Warren D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark E. Warren sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75
28 99
29 96
30 96
31 81
32 86
33 81
34 84
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25 43
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Political Science in Canada Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Political Science in Canada Leader Award

Overview

Mark E. Warren is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their research is primarily situated within the social sciences, with a strong focus on political science and international relations, sociology and political science, and communication. Additional subfields of study include gender studies and law.

The main topics addressed in their work span political philosophy and ethics, social media and politics, electoral systems and political participation, corruption and economic development, social policy and reform studies, migration, refugees, and integration, as well as critical theory and philosophy.

Warren has published extensively in several academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Political Science Today
  • Journal of Deliberative Democracy
  • Philosophy & Social Criticism
  • Res Publica
  • Nature

Recent papers authored by Mark E. Warren showcase their focus on deliberative democracy and democratic theory, including:

  • Participatory Deliberative Democracy in Complex Mass Societies (2020), Journal of Deliberative Democracy
  • A Bridge Across the Democracy-Expertise Divide (2021), Nature

Other recent relevant publications in the broader field of democracy-related studies include:

  • Can Meritocracy Replace Democracy? A Conceptual Framework (2020), Philosophy & Social Criticism
  • Citizens' Assemblies and Democracy (2021), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics
  • Why Deliberation and Voting Belong Together (2023), Res Publica

Collaborations are a notable aspect of their scholarly activity. Frequent co-authors include Baogang He, Simone Chambers, John Ishiyama, Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier, and Lisa Martin, each having co-authored multiple works with Warren.

In addition to journal articles, Warren has contributed to academic books, most notably a publication with Princeton University Press titled Democracy and Association (2021).

Best Publications

  • The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic Theory

    Nadia Urbinati;Mark E. Warren

  • A systemic approach to deliberative democracy

    Jane J. Mansbridge;James Bohman;Simone Chambers;Thomas Christiano

  • Democracy and Trust

    Mark E. Warren

  • Democracy and association

    Mark E. Warren

  • Democracy and Association

    Unknown

  • Designing deliberative democracy : the British Columbia Citizens' Assembly

    Mark E. Warren;Hilary Pearse

  • Democratic Theory and Self-Transformation

    Mark Warren

  • What Does Corruption Mean in a Democracy

    Mark E. Warren

  • Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy

    André Bächtiger;Jane Mansbridge;John Dryzek;Mark Warren

  • Deliberative Democracy and Authority

    Mark E. Warren

  • Nietzsche and political thought

    Mark Warren

  • The crisis of democracy and the science of deliberation.

    John S. Dryzek;André Bächtiger;Simone Chambers;Joshua Cohen

  • What should we expect from more democracy : Radically democratic responses to politics

    Mark E. Warren

  • Governance-driven democratization

    Mark E. Warren

  • A Problem-Based Approach to Democratic Theory

    Mark E. Warren

  • The self in discursive democracy

    Mark E. Warren

  • Practices of Freedom: Governance-Driven Democratization

    Unknown

  • Democracy and Trust: Democratic theory and trust

    Unknown

  • What Can Democratic Participation Mean Today

    Mark E. Warren

  • Can Deliberative Minipublics Address the Cognitive Challenges of Democratic Citizenship

    Mark E. Warren;John Gastil

  • Two trust-based uses of minipublics in democratic systems

    Michael K. MacKenzie;Mark E. Warren

  • Institutionalizing Deliberative Democracy

    Mark E. Warren

  • Voting with Your Feet: Exit-based Empowerment in Democratic Theory

    Mark E. Warren

  • Deliberation, information, and trust: the British Columbia Citizens' Assembly as agenda setter

    Fred Cutler;Richard Johnston;R. Kenneth Carty;André Blais

  • Democracy and Deceit: Regulating Appearances of Corruption

    Mark E. Warren

Frequent Co-Authors

Baogang He
Baogang He Deakin University
Archon Fung
Archon Fung Harvard University
Jane Mansbridge
Jane Mansbridge Harvard University
Dennis F. Thompson
Dennis F. Thompson Harvard University
John Gastil
John Gastil Pennsylvania State University
James S. Fishkin
James S. Fishkin Stanford University
John S. Dryzek
John S. Dryzek University of Canberra
André Bächtiger
André Bächtiger University of Stuttgart
James N. Druckman
James N. Druckman University of Rochester
André Blais
André Blais University of Montreal

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in expanding your studies beyond Political Science? Many students look into online history master's degrees for a broader understanding of global events, public policy, and societal trends.

If you’re aiming for a faster academic route, consider the quickest masters degree programs available online. These accelerated options can help you graduate sooner and start your career earlier.

Not all career paths require a full degree. Many professionals boost their resume with quick certifications in fields like business administration, legal studies, or public service. These can lead to well-paying roles and provide specialized skills valued in the workforce.

Budget-conscious students can find top-quality education at affordable online colleges. These institutions offer flexible learning options without the high costs, making higher education more accessible for everyone.

Best Scientists Citing Mark E. Warren

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles