World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
27
Citations
4370
World Ranking
1438
National Ranking
722

Michael A. Neblo publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael A. Neblo sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 117 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Michael A. Neblo D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael A. Neblo sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 27 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Andrew Carnegie Fellow

Best Publications

  • Who Wants To Deliberate—And Why?

    Michael A. Neblo;Kevin M. Esterling;Ryan P. Kennedy;David M. J. Lazer

  • Disentangling Diversity in Deliberative Democracy: Competing Theories, their Blind Spots, and Complementarities

    André Bächtiger;Simon Niemeyer;Michael Neblo;Marco R. Steenbergen

  • The crisis of democracy and the science of deliberation.

    John S. Dryzek;André Bächtiger;Simone Chambers;Joshua Cohen

  • The Coevolution of Networks and Political Attitudes

    David Lazer;Brian Rubineau;Carol Chetkovich;Nancy Katz

  • Patients, privacy and trust: patients' willingness to allow researchers to access their medical records.

    Laura J. Damschroder;Joy L. Pritts;Michael A. Neblo;Rosemarie J. Kalarickal

  • Thinking through Democracy: Between the Theory and Practice of Deliberative Politics

    Michael Neblo

  • Deliberative Democracy between Theory and Practice

    Michael A. Neblo

  • Politics with the People: Building a Directly Representative Democracy

    Michael A. Neblo;Kevin M. Esterling;David M. J. Lazer

  • Means, Motive, and Opportunity in Becoming Informed about Politics: A Deliberative Field Experiment with Members of Congress and Their Constituents

    Kevin M. Esterling;Michael A. Neblo;David M. J. Lazer

  • Family Disputes: Diversity in Defining and Measuring Deliberation

    Michael A. Neblo

  • Politics <I>with</I> the People

    Unknown

  • The Incidental Pundit: Who Talks Politics with Whom, and Why?

    William Minozzi;Hyunjin Song;David M. J. Lazer;Michael A. Neblo

  • Field experiment evidence of substantive, attributional, and behavioral persuasion by members of Congress in online town halls.

    William Minozzi;Michael A. Neblo;Kevin M. Esterling;David M. J. Lazer;David M. J. Lazer

  • Symposium: Toward More Realistic Models of Deliberative Democracy Disentangling Diversity in Deliberative Democracy: Competing Theories, Their Blind Spots and Complementarities*

    André Bächtiger;Simon Niemeyer;Michael Neblo;Marco R. Steenbergen

  • What Is Good Public Deliberation

    Susan Dorr Goold;Michael A Neblo;Scott Y H Kim;Raymond D E Vries

  • A Plague on Politics? The COVID Crisis, Expertise, and the Future of Legitimation

    Michael A. Neblo;Jeremy L. Wallace

  • Who Wants to Deliberate - and Why?

    Michael A. Neblo;Kevin M. Esterling;Ryan Kennedy;David Lazer;David Lazer

  • Impassioned Democracy: The Roles of Emotion in Deliberative Theory

    Michael A. Neblo

  • Expanding the Conversation: Multiplier Effects From a Deliberative Field Experiment

    David M. Lazer;Anand E. Sokhey;Michael A. Neblo;Kevin M. Esterling

  • Representative Communication: Web Site Interactivity and Distributional Path Dependence in the U.S. Congress

    Kevin M. Esterling;David M. J. Lazer;Michael A. Neblo

Frequent Co-Authors

David Lazer
David Lazer Northeastern University
Anand E. Sokhey
Anand E. Sokhey University of Colorado Boulder
Ines Mergel
Ines Mergel University of Konstanz
Simon Niemeyer
Simon Niemeyer University of Canberra
André Bächtiger
André Bächtiger University of Stuttgart
Archon Fung
Archon Fung Harvard University
James N. Druckman
James N. Druckman University of Rochester
Mark E. Warren
Mark E. Warren University of British Columbia
John S. Dryzek
John S. Dryzek University of Canberra
Jane Mansbridge
Jane Mansbridge Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Michael A. Neblo

Recently Published Articles