World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
28
Citations
3051
World Ranking
1396
National Ranking
8

Jane Suiter publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane Suiter sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 112 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Jane Suiter D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane Suiter sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 28 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The crisis of democracy and the science of deliberation.

    John S. Dryzek;André Bächtiger;Simone Chambers;Joshua Cohen

  • ‘Systematizing’ constitutional deliberation: the 2016–18 citizens’ assembly in Ireland

    David M. Farrell;Jane Suiter;Clodagh Harris

  • Post-truth Politics:

    Jane Suiter

  • Constitutional Deliberative Democracy in Europe

    Min Reuchamps;Jane Suiter

  • When do deliberative citizens change their opinions? Evidence from the Irish Citizens’ Assembly

    Jane Suiter;David M Farrell;Eoin O’Malley

  • Refugees and Network Publics on Twitter: Networked Framing, Affect, and Capture:

    Eugenia Siapera;Moses Boudourides;Sergios Lenis;Jane Suiter

  • Deliberative Democracy in Action Irish-style: The 2011 We the Citizens Pilot Citizens' Assembly

    David M. Farrell;Eoin O'Malley;Jane Suiter

  • Countering Misinformation

    Unknown

  • Deliberative Mini-Publics: Core Design Features

    David Farrell;Nicole Curato;John S. Dryzek;Brigitte Geißel

  • Understanding the 2015 marriage referendum in Ireland: context, campaign, and conservative Ireland

    Johan A. Elkink;David M. Farrell;Theresa Reidy;Jane Suiter

  • News Media Trust and News Consumption: Factors Related to Trust in News in 35 Countries

    Antonis Kalogeropoulos;Jane Suiter;Linards Udris;Mark Eisenegger

  • Start Spreading the News: A Comparative Experiment on the Effects of Populist Communication on Political Engagement in Sixteen European Countries:

    Michael Hameleers;Linda Bos;Nayla Fawzi;Carsten Reinemann

  • Does Deliberation Help Deliver Informed Electorates: Evidence from Irish Referendum Votes

    Jane Suiter;Theresa Reidy

  • Deliberative Mini-Publics

    Unknown

  • The death of conservative Ireland? The 2018 abortion referendum

    Johan A. Elkink;David M. Farrell;Sofie Marien;Theresa Reidy

  • When mini-publics and maxi-publics coincide: Ireland's national debate on abortion

    David M. Farrell;Jane Suiter;Kevin Cunningham;Clodagh Harris

  • Scaling up Deliberation: Testing the Potential of Mini‐Publics to Enhance the Deliberative Capacity of Citizens

    Jane Suiter;Lala Muradova;John Gastil;David M. Farrell

  • The Effects of Mixed Membership in a Deliberative Forum: The Irish Constitutional Convention of 2012–2014:

    David M Farrell;Jane Suiter;Clodagh Harris;Kevin Cunningham

  • Ireland’s evolving constitution

    Jane Suiter;David M. Farrell;Clodagh Harris

  • Deliberation in Action – Ireland’s Abortion Referendum:

    Jane Suiter

Frequent Co-Authors

David M. Farrell
David M. Farrell University College Dublin
John S. Dryzek
John S. Dryzek University of Canberra
Simon Niemeyer
Simon Niemeyer University of Canberra
Sofie Marien
Sofie Marien KU Leuven
Jane Mansbridge
Jane Mansbridge Harvard University
Archon Fung
Archon Fung Harvard University
Toril Aalberg
Toril Aalberg Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Mark E. Warren
Mark E. Warren University of British Columbia
James N. Druckman
James N. Druckman University of Rochester
Dennis F. Thompson
Dennis F. Thompson Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jane Suiter

Recently Published Articles