World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 34 862 779 29 28 127 4216

Michael Hameleers publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael Hameleers between 2016 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael Hameleers published across 10 years, from 2016 to 2025, averaging 15.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2021. 46 of the 155 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2016 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2021. 2016: 1 publication 2017: 4 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 37 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 30 publications 2025: 16 publications
2016 2025

155 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael Hameleers: publications per year, 2016 to 2025
Year Publications
2016 1
2017 4
2018 5
2019 9
2020 21
2021 37
2022 14
2023 18
2024 30
2025 16
Total 155
Download as CSV

Michael Hameleers publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Hameleers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 126–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 127 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73 127
131–135 64
136–140 45
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Michael Hameleers D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Hameleers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75
28 99
29 96
30 96
31 81
32 86
33 81
34 84 34
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Michael Hameleers is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily falls within the social sciences, with a focus on sociology, political science, communication, artificial intelligence, and social psychology. Hameleers's work spans various subfields, emphasizing the interactions between media, politics, and society.

Their research topics cover a diverse range of areas including misinformation and its impacts, social media and politics, hate speech and cyberbullying detection, populism and right-wing movements, media influence and politics, media studies and communication, and public relations and crisis communication.

Michael Hameleers has contributed notably to academic journals with multiple publications in venues such as:

  • International Journal of Public Opinion Research
  • Political Communication
  • Information Communication & Society
  • Mass Communication & Society
  • The International Journal of Press/Politics

Selected recent papers authored by Michael Hameleers include:

  • "A Picture Paints a Thousand Lies? The Effects and Mechanisms of Multimodal Disinformation and Rebuttals Disseminated via Social Media" (2020), published in Political Communication
  • "Separating truth from lies: comparing the effects of news media literacy interventions and fact-checkers in response to political misinformation in the US and Netherlands" (2020), published in Information Communication & Society
  • "Populist Disinformation: Exploring Intersections between Online Populism and Disinformation in the US and the Netherlands" (2020), published in Politics and Governance

Frequent co-authors of Michael Hameleers include:

  • Toni G.L.A. van der Meer
  • Anna Brosius
  • Claes H. de Vreese
  • Marina Tulin
  • L. Bos

Best Publications

  • “They Did It”: The Effects of Emotionalized Blame Attribution in Populist Communication:

    Michael Hameleers;Linda Bos;Claes H. de Vreese

  • Misinformation and Polarization in a High-Choice Media Environment: How Effective Are Political Fact-Checkers?:

    Michael Hameleers;Toni G. L. A. van der Meer

  • It’s us against them: a comparative experiment on the effects of populist messages communicated via social media

    Michael Hameleers;Desirée Schmuck

  • Separating truth from lies: comparing the effects of news media literacy interventions and fact-checkers in response to political misinformation in the US and Netherlands

    Michael Hameleers

  • The Appeal of Media Populism: The Media Preferences of Citizens with Populist Attitudes

    M. Hameleers;L. Bos;C.H. de Vreese

  • Whom to trust? Media exposure patterns of citizens with perceptions of misinformation and disinformation related to the news media

    Unknown

  • Visual Mis- and Disinformation, Social Media, and Democracy:

    Viorela Dan;Britt Paris;Joan Donovan;Michael Hameleers

  • Can Fighting Misinformation Have a Negative Spillover Effect? How Warnings for the Threat of Misinformation Can Decrease General News Credibility

    Unknown

  • Closer to the people: A comparative content analysis of populist communication on social networking sites in pre- and post-Election periods

    Desirée Schmuck;Michael Hameleers

  • Disinformation as a context-bound phenomenon: toward a conceptual clarification integrating actors, intentions and techniques of creation and dissemination

    Unknown

  • Selective Exposure to Populist Communication: How Attitudinal Congruence Drives the Effects of Populist Attributions of Blame

    M. Hameleers;L. Bos;C.H. de Vreese

  • Prospect Theory in Times of a Pandemic: The Effects of Gain versus Loss Framing on Risky Choices and Emotional Responses During the 2020 Coronavirus Outbreak - Evidence from the US and the Netherlands

    Michael Hameleers

  • Start Spreading the News: A Comparative Experiment on the Effects of Populist Communication on Political Engagement in Sixteen European Countries:

    Michael Hameleers;Linda Bos;Nayla Fawzi;Carsten Reinemann

  • Feeling “disinformed” lowers compliance with COVID-19 guidelines: Evidence from the US, UK, Netherlands and Germany

    Michael Hameleers;Toni G. L. A. van der Meer;Anna Brosius

  • Framing blame: toward a better understanding of the effects of populist communication on populist party preferences

    M. Hameleers;L. Bos;C. de Vreese

  • The Rise of a Populist Zeitgeist? A Content Analysis of Populist Media Coverage in Newspapers Published between 1990 and 2017

    Michael Hameleers;Rens Vliegenthart

  • Constructing Discourses on (Un)truthfulness: Attributions of Reality, Misinformation, and Disinformation by Politicians in a Comparative Social Media Setting:

    Michael Hameleers;Sophie Minihold

  • The populism of online communities: Constructing the boundary between “blameless” people and “culpable” others

    Michael Hameleers

  • Shoot the messenger? The media’s role in framing populist attributions of blame:

    M. Hameleers;L. Bos;C.H. de Vreese

  • Fighting for truth? The role perceptions of Filipino journalists in an era of mis- and disinformation

    Hon Sophia S Balod;Michael Hameleers

  • Putting Our Own People First: The Content and Effects of Online Right-wing Populist Discourse Surrounding the European Refugee Crisis

    Michael Hameleers

Frequent Co-Authors

Desirée Schmuck
Desirée Schmuck University of Vienna
Claes H. de Vreese
Claes H. de Vreese University of Amsterdam
Rens Vliegenthart
Rens Vliegenthart Wageningen University & Research
Carsten Reinemann
Carsten Reinemann Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Jesper Strömbäck
Jesper Strömbäck University of Gothenburg
Jörg Matthes
Jörg Matthes University of Vienna
Hajo G. Boomgaarden
Hajo G. Boomgaarden University of Vienna
Toril Aalberg
Toril Aalberg Norwegian University of Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Political Science graduates have a wide range of online degree options to complement or expand their expertise. Professionals interested in research and information management may consider an online library science degree. This program offers valuable skills in archiving, digital librarianship, and information organization—fields highly relevant to government and policy roles.

For those passionate about understanding the evolution of societies and politics, programs for history majors provide a strong foundation. These degrees enhance students’ critical thinking and analytical skills, opening the door to careers in research, education, and public service.

If you seek flexibility, an interdisciplinary studies online degree allows you to blend political science with subjects like economics, law, or communications. This pathway is ideal for careers that require a cross-disciplinary outlook.

Graduate students can also pursue advanced credentials with the cheapest online history master's degree programs, supporting careers in academia, policymaking, or specialized research positions.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Hameleers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles