World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
53
Citations
10160
World Ranking
4830
National Ranking
515

Ivana Marková publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ivana Marková sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 233 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ivana Marková D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ivana Marková sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1997 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh

Overview

Ivana Marková is affiliated with the University of Stirling in the United Kingdom. Their research spans several interconnected disciplines, including arts and humanities, psychology, and neuroscience, with a focus on philosophy, clinical psychology, neurology, sociology, and psychiatry.

Their work prominently covers topics such as mental health and psychiatry, historical psychiatry and medical practices, neurology and historical studies, empathy and medical education, intergenerational family dynamics and caregiving, dementia and cognitive impairment research, as well as data analysis and archiving.

Recent publications by Ivana Marková include:

  • "Future outlook of people living alone with early-stage dementia and their non-resident relatives and friends who support them," 2020, Ageing and Society
  • "Historical Epistemology: a Research Approach in Psychiatry," 2020, Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science
  • "Empathy or sympathy: a necessary distinction?", 2024, History of Psychiatry
  • "Epistemic trust and authority," 2025, Cultures of Science
  • "Empathy: a case study in the historical epistemology of psychiatry," 2023, History of Psychiatry

They frequently publish in the following venues:

  • History of Psychiatry
  • Ageing and Society
  • Cultures of Science
  • Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science
  • Journal of Huntington's Disease

Collaborations are an important aspect of their research. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Germán E. Berríos
  • Anthony Martyr
  • Sharon M. Nelis
  • Robin G. Morris
  • Ilona Roth

Ivana Marková has been recognized as a Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh since 1997.

Best Publications

  • Theory and method of social representations

    Wolfgang Wagner;Gerard Duveen;Robert M Farr;Sandra Jovchelovitch

  • Dialogicality and social representations : the dynamics of mind

    Ivana Marková

  • Dialogue in Focus Groups: Exploring Socially Shared Knowledge

    Ivana Marková;Per Linell;Michèle Grossen;Anne Salazar Orvig

  • Identification of genetic variants associated with Huntington's disease progression: a genome-wide association study

    Davina J Hensman Moss;Antonio F Pardiñas;Douglas Langbehn;Kitty Lo

  • Coping with social stigma: people with intellectual disabilities moving from institutions and family home

    Andrew Jahoda;Ivana Markova

  • Dialogicality and social representations

    Ivana Markova

  • Presenting Social Representations: A Conversation:

    Serge Moscovici;Ivana Marková

  • Constitution of the Self: Intersubjectivity and Dialogicality

    Ivana Marková

  • Awareness in dementia: A review of assessment methods and measures

    Linda Clare;Ivana Marková;Frans Verhey;Geraldine Kenny

  • The dynamics of dialogue

    Ivana Marková;Klaus Foppa

  • The assessment of insight in clinical psychiatry: a new scale

    I. S. Marková;G. E. Berrios

  • The meaning of insight in clinical psychiatry.

    I S Marková;G E Berrios

  • Asymmetries in dialogue

    Ivana Marková;Klaus Foppa

  • Awareness in Alzheimer's disease and associated dementias: Theoretical framework and clinical implications

    Linda Clare;Ivana S Marková;Ilona Roth;Robin G Morris

  • Trust and distrust: sociocultural perspectives

    Ivana Marková;Alex Gillespie

  • The influence of psychological, social and contextual factors on the expression and measurement of awareness in early-stage dementia: testing a biopsychosocial model

    Linda Clare;Sharon M. Nelis;Anthony Martyr;Judith Roberts

  • Mutualities in Dialogue

    Ivana Marková;Carl F. Graumann;Klaus Foppa

  • Representations, Concepts and Social Change: The phenomenon of AIDS

    Ivana Markova;Patricia Wilkie

  • Paradigms, thought, and language

    Ivana Marková

  • The Social context of language

    Ivana Marková

  • Psychiatric symptoms in neurologically asymptomatic Huntington's disease gene carriers: a comparison with gene negative at risk subjects

    G. E. Berrios;A. C. Wagle;I. S. Markova;S. A. Wagle

Frequent Co-Authors

Kevin Power
Kevin Power University of Stirling
Per Linell
Per Linell University of Gothenburg
Andrew Jahoda
Andrew Jahoda University of Glasgow
Alex Gillespie
Alex Gillespie London School of Economics and Political Science
Serge Moscovici
Serge Moscovici École Normale Supérieure
Deborah Tannen
Deborah Tannen Georgetown University
William B. Gudykunst
William B. Gudykunst California State University, Fullerton
Rom Harré
Rom Harré Georgetown University
Diana Rose
Diana Rose King's College London
Marvin Harris
Marvin Harris University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing a psychology degree program involves considering multiple factors—such as accreditation, curriculum, flexibility, and career prospects. For those looking to study in-person, comparing the best psychology program rankings in Washington, D.C., the best psychology degree rankings in Wichita, and the best psychology program rankings in Wyoming can provide helpful insight into top schools in various regions across the U.S. Each location offers unique opportunities, networks, and specializations that may fit different career objectives.

For students seeking flexibility or balancing coursework with other responsibilities, online options are increasingly popular. If you prefer distance learning, exploring the easiest online bachelor's in psychology degree programs in Florida offers guidance on accessible programs that streamline your path to a degree.

Whether you pursue traditional or online study, psychology graduates can explore diverse career pathways, including counseling, research, education, and organizational roles. Evaluating your goals and local or online options is key to a successful start in the field of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Ivana Marková

Trending Scientists