World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
56
Citations
9064
World Ranking
4270
National Ranking
457

Kevin Power publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin Power sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 149 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Kevin Power D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin Power sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kevin Power is affiliated with the University of Stirling in the United Kingdom. Their research intersects multiple aspects of psychology and genetics, with a particular focus on clinical psychology and the applications of genomic data within healthcare systems.

Their publication record includes work across several subfields, such as clinical psychology, genetics, applied psychology, epidemiology, and general health professions. The primary research themes revolve around genomics and rare diseases, electronic health records systems, digital mental health interventions, genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities, substance abuse treatment and outcomes, cancer genomics and diagnostics, and healthcare systems and technology.

Kevin Power has contributed to several scientific articles, including papers published in well-regarded journals. Some of their recent publications include:

  • "Exenatide once a week versus placebo as a potential disease-modifying treatment for people with Parkinson's disease in the UK: a phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group, randomised, placebo-controlled trial" (2025, The Lancet)
  • "A comparison of genomic diagnostics in adults and children with epilepsy and comorbid intellectual disability" (2020, European Journal of Human Genetics)
  • "Effectiveness of the use of implementation intentions on reduction of substance use: A meta-analysis" (2020, Drug and Alcohol Dependence)
  • "The development of an epilepsy electronic patient portal: Facilitating both patient empowerment and remote clinician-patient interaction in a post-COVID-19 world" (2020, Epilepsia)
  • "Genomic considerations for FHIR®; eMERGE implementation lessons" (2021, Journal of Biomedical Informatics)

Frequent publication venues include Group Analysis, Epilepsy & Behavior, The Lancet, European Journal of Human Genetics, and Drug and Alcohol Dependence.

Collaboration is evident through frequent coauthors such as M Fitzsimons, Máire White, Colin P. Doherty, Norman Delanty, and Hany El-Naggar, reflecting interdisciplinary engagement in psychology, neurology, and genomic research.

Best Publications

  • Burnout in psychiatric nursing

    Catherine J. Kilfedder;Kevin G. Power;Tony J. Wells

  • Initiation and continuation of breastfeeding: theory of planned behaviour

    Vivien Swanson;Kevin George Power

  • Early intervention for relapse in schizophrenia : results of a 12-month randomized controlled trial of cognitive behavioural therapy

    Andrew Ian Gumley;Margaret O'Grady;Lisa McNay;James Reilly

  • Effectiveness of Self-Compassion Related Therapies: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Alexander C. Wilson;Alexander C. Wilson;Kate Mackintosh;Kevin Power;Stella W. Y. Chan

  • A controlled comparison of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing versus exposure plus cognitive restructuring versus waiting list in the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder

    Kevin Power;Theresa McGoldrick;Keith Brown;Robin Buchanan

  • The relationship between trait vulnerability and anxiety and depressive diagnoses at long-term follow-up of Generalized Anxiety Disorder.

    Julie A Chambers;Kevin G Power;Robert C Durham

  • Individual differences, social support and coping with the examination stress: a study of the psychosocial and academic adjustment of first year home students

    K.F Halamandaris;K.G Power

  • Long-term outcome of cognitive behaviour therapy clinical trials in central Scotland.

    R. C. Durham;J. A. Chambers;K. G. Power;D. M. Sharp

  • A controlled comparison of cognitive- behaviour therapy, Diazepam, and placebo, alone and in combination, for the treatment of generalised anxiety disorder

    Kevin G. Power;R. J. Simpson;V. Swanson;L. A. Wallace

  • Childhood trauma and eating psychopathology: a mediating role for dissociation and emotion dysregulation?

    Stuart J Moulton;Emily Newman;Kevin George Power;Vivien Swanson

  • Effectiveness of Positive Youth Development Interventions: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

    Oana Ciocanel;Kevin Power;Ann Eriksen;Kirsty Gillings

  • Self-perceived occupational stress and distress in a Scottish police force

    Fiona H. Biggam;Kevin G. Power;Ranald R. Macdonald;William B. Carcary

  • Employees' perceptions of organizational restructuring: The role of social support

    Vivien Swanson;Kevin Power

  • Bullying and victimisation in Scottish secondary schools: Same or separate entities?

    A Karatzias;K. G. Power;Vivian Swanson

  • Early intervention for relapse in schizophrenia: Impact of cognitive behavioural therapy on negative beliefs about psychosis and self-esteem

    Andrew Gumley;Athanasios Karatzias;Kevin Power;James Reilly

  • A comparison of the efficacy and acceptability of group versus individual cognitive behaviour therapy in the treatment of panic disorder and agoraphobia in primary care

    D. M. Sharp;D. M. Sharp;K. G. Power;V. Swanson

  • Occupational stress and family life: A comparison of male and female doctors.

    V. Swanson;K. G. Power;R. J. Simpson

  • Fluvoxamine, placebo, and cognitive behaviour therapy used alone and in combination in the treatment of panic disorder and agoraphobia

    Donald M. Sharp;Kevin G. Power;R.J. Simpson;Vivien Swanson

  • Social Support and Psychological Distress in a Group of Incarcerated Young Offenders

    Fiona H. Biggam;Kevin G. Power

  • A Controlled Comparison of the Effectiveness and Efficiency of Two Psychological Therapies for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing vs. Emotional Freedom Techniques

    Thanos Karatzias;Kevin Power;Keith Brown;Theresa McGoldrick

Frequent Co-Authors

Vivien Swanson
Vivien Swanson University of Stirling
Thanos Karatzias
Thanos Karatzias Edinburgh Napier University
Richard J. Simpson
Richard J. Simpson La Trobe University
Ivana Marková
Ivana Marková University of Stirling
Andrew Gumley
Andrew Gumley University of Glasgow
Heleen Riper
Heleen Riper Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Fabio Sani
Fabio Sani University of Dundee
Annet Kleiboer
Annet Kleiboer Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Ross White
Ross White University of Liverpool
David Daniel Ebert
David Daniel Ebert Technical University of Munich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree in the USA opens the door to diverse and dynamic career options. Many students are drawn to careers in child and adolescent psychology, which focus on supporting the mental health and development of young people. These roles can be found in schools, hospitals, and private practices.

If you’re interested in developmental processes and interventions, child psychology careers offer rewarding pathways to work directly with children and families. These opportunities often require specialized graduate study and state licensure.

The cognitive psychology job market is also expanding. Professionals in this area work in research, education, technology, and healthcare, exploring how people think, learn, and remember. These skills are valuable for designing programs or products that enhance human well-being and performance.

Graduates may also consider counseling, with psychologists helping clients manage stress, trauma, and life transitions. To learn more about potential employers and work environments, see where do counseling psychologists work.

Best Scientists Citing Kevin Power

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles