World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 93 835 730 527 450 332 35287

E. Scott Huebner publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by E. Scott Huebner between 1984 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. E. Scott Huebner published across 42 years, from 1984 to 2025, averaging 8.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2021. 16 of the 345 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2021. 1984: 4 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 6 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 5 publications
1984 2025

345 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
E. Scott Huebner: publications per year, 1984 to 2025
Year Publications
1984 4
1985 4
1986 4
1987 2
1988 5
1989 3
1990 1
1991 6
1992 2
1993 7
1994 5
1995 4
1996 2
1997 2
1998 5
1999 2
2000 7
2001 3
2002 7
2003 6
2004 13
2005 8
2006 8
2007 8
2008 5
2009 7
2010 6
2011 10
2012 12
2013 11
2014 20
2015 9
2016 18
2017 9
2018 11
2019 14
2020 20
2021 27
2022 19
2023 13
2024 11
2025 5
Total 345
Download as CSV

E. Scott Huebner publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where E. Scott Huebner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 331–340 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 332 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92 332
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

E. Scott Huebner D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where E. Scott Huebner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70 93
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

E. Scott Huebner is affiliated with the University of South Carolina in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences, with significant focus on subfields such as Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, and Education. Their work also touches on Safety Research and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

Their main areas of study include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression, and Early Childhood Education and Development. Other topics often covered in their research are Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction, Child Development and Digital Technology, Youth Development and Social Support, and Resilience and Mental Health.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by E. Scott Huebner reflect a strong focus on mental health, bullying, and developmental psychology. Notable publications include:

  • Association between bullying victimization and depressive symptoms in children: The mediating role of self-esteem (2021, Journal of Affective Disorders)
  • Longitudinal associations among neuroticism, depression, and cyberbullying in early adolescents (2020, Computers in Human Behavior)
  • Occupational Stress and Employees Complete Mental Health: A Cross-Cultural Empirical Study (2020, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health)
  • Longitudinal relations between hope and academic achievement in elementary school students: Behavioral engagement as a mediator (2020, Learning and Individual Differences)
  • Profiles and Transitions of Dual-Factor Mental Health among Chinese Early Adolescents: The Predictive Roles of Perceived Psychological Need Satisfaction and Stress in School (2020, Journal of Youth and Adolescence)

E. Scott Huebner frequently publishes in journals such as Journal of Affective Disorders, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Current Psychology, Child Abuse & Neglect, and Journal of Youth and Adolescence.

Their frequent collaborators include researchers like Lili Tian, Jianhua Zhou, Xue Gong, and Xiaofeng Xu, with multiple joint publications highlighting ongoing academic partnerships.

Best Publications

  • Initial Development of the Student's Life Satisfaction Scale:

    E. Scott Huebner

  • Preliminary Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Life Satisfaction Scale for Children.

    E. Scott Huebner

  • Characteristics of Adolescents Who Report Very High Life Satisfaction

    Rich Gilman;E. Scott Huebner

  • Preliminary Validation of the Brief Multidimensional Students' Life Satisfaction Scale (BMSLSS)

    Julie L. Seligson;E. Scott Huebner;Robert F. Valois

  • Research on Assessment of Life Satisfaction of Children and Adolescents

    E. Scott Huebner

  • Correlates of life satisfaction in children.

    E. Scott Huebner

  • An Analysis of Hope as a Psychological Strength.

    Michael F. Valle;E. Scott Huebner;Shannon M. Suldo

  • Engagement as flourishing: The contribution of positive emotions and coping to adolescents' engagement at school and with learning

    Amy L. Reschly;E. Scott Huebner;James J. Appleton;Susan Antaramian

  • Life events, self‐concept, and adolescents' positive subjective well‐being

    Gable McCullough;E. Scott Huebner;James E. Laughlin

  • Life Satisfaction and Student Engagement in Adolescents

    Ashley D. Lewis;E. Scott Huebner;Patrick S. Malone;Robert F. Valois

  • Handbook of positive psychology in schools

    Michael J. Furlong;Richard Gilman;E. Scott Huebner

  • Does life satisfaction moderate the effects of stressful life events on psychopathological behavior during adolescence

    Shannon M. Suldo;E. Scott Huebner

  • Levels and Demographic Correlates of Adolescent Life Satisfaction Reports

    E. Scott Huebner;Wanzer Drane;Robert F. Valois

  • Relationship between perceived life satisfaction and adolescents’ substance abuse

    Keith J Zullig;Robert F Valois;E.Scott Huebner;John E Oeltmann

  • Adolescents' perceived quality of life: An exploratory investigation

    Tammy Dew;E.Scott Huebner

  • Is Extremely High Life Satisfaction During Adolescence Advantageous

    Shannon M. Suldo;E. Scott Huebner

  • ATTACHMENT RELATIONSHIPS AND ADOLESCENTS' LIFE SATISFACTION: SOME RELATIONSHIPS MATTER MORE TO GIRLS THAN BOYS

    Claudia Q. Ma;E. Scott Huebner

  • Severe Dating Violence and Quality of Life Among South Carolina High School Students

    Ann L Coker;Robert E McKeown;Maureen Sanderson;Keith E Davis

  • Life satisfaction in children and youth: Empirical foundations and implications for school psychologists

    E. Scott Huebner;Shannon M. Suldo;Laura C. Smith;Caroline G. McKnight

  • The Role of Life Satisfaction in the Relationship Between Authoritative Parenting Dimensions and Adolescent Problem Behavior

    Shannon M. Suldo;E. Scott Huebner

  • Relationships among stressful life events, temperament, problem behavior, and global life satisfaction in adolescents

    Caroline G. McKnight;E. Scott Huebner;Shannon Suldo

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert F. Valois
Robert F. Valois University of South Carolina
Keith J. Zullig
Keith J. Zullig West Virginia University
Shannon M. Suldo
Shannon M. Suldo University of South Florida
Rich Gilman
Rich Gilman Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Nansook Park
Nansook Park University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Michael J. Furlong
Michael J. Furlong University of California, Santa Barbara
Amy L. Reschly
Amy L. Reschly University of Georgia
Willibald Ruch
Willibald Ruch University of Zurich
Patrick S. Malone
Patrick S. Malone Sapienza University of Rome
Asher Ben-Arieh
Asher Ben-Arieh Hebrew University of Jerusalem

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding careers. Many students consider online programs to gain flexibility while working toward their goals. One popular pathway is becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), a role in high demand across the country.

Understanding the specific educational and licensing requirements is crucial, as they vary by location. For those interested in practicing in Nebraska, it's important to review the mft requirements in Lincoln. If you want to work in California, make sure you learn about the mft requirements in Long Beach and the broader Los Angeles mft education requirements.

On the other hand, aspiring therapists in Kentucky should look into the Louisville mft education requirements. By exploring these paths, students can better plan their educational journey and meet the qualifications needed for meaningful positions in mental health and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing E. Scott Huebner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles