World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 40 8185 7641 4386 3992 123 7598

Keith J. Zullig publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Keith J. Zullig between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Keith J. Zullig published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 5.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2019. 9 of the 143 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2019. 2001: 3 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 5 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 3 publications
2001 2025

143 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Keith J. Zullig: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 3
2002 1
2003 3
2004 5
2005 6
2006 6
2007 1
2008 5
2009 6
2010 10
2011 8
2012 7
2013 4
2014 11
2015 4
2016 5
2017 6
2018 5
2019 12
2020 10
2021 7
2022 4
2023 5
2024 6
2025 3
Total 143
Download as CSV

Keith J. Zullig publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith J. Zullig sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 123 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 123
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Keith J. Zullig D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith J. Zullig sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 40
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Keith J. Zullig is affiliated with West Virginia University in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines within psychology, social sciences, and medicine, with significant contributions in clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, public health, environmental and occupational health, social psychology, as well as sociology and political science.

The scientist's work covers various main topics including:

  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Infection Control and Ventilation
  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Sleep and Related Disorders
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Their notable recent publications include:

  • "Impacts of Coal Use on Health," 2020, published in Annual Review of Public Health
  • "Observed Face Mask Use at Six Universities - United States, September-November 2020," 2021, in MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
  • "Adverse childhood experiences among females in substance use treatment and their children: A pilot study," 2021, appearing in Preventive Medicine Reports
  • "A theoretical model of college students' sleep quality and health-related quality of life," 2022, published in Journal of Behavioral Medicine
  • "Life satisfaction among a clinical eating disorder population," 2020, published in Journal of Eating Disorders

Keith J. Zullig frequently publishes in journals such as:

  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • Preventive Medicine Reports
  • Annual Review of Public Health
  • MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report

The scientist's collaborations include frequent co-authors such as:

  • Elizabeth A. Claydon
  • Christa Lilly
  • Álfgeir L. Kristjánsson
  • Caterina DeFazio
  • Danielle M. Davidov

Keith J. Zullig's multidisciplinary work integrates behavioral, environmental, and social perspectives, contributing to a better understanding of public health challenges, psychological processes, and social issues. Their research addresses complex topics that intersect clinical practice and community health, reflecting a broad engagement with both experimental and applied psychology domains.

Best Publications

  • School Climate: Historical Review, Instrument Development, and School Assessment:

    Keith J. Zullig;Tommy M. Koopman;Jon M. Patton;Valerie A. Ubbes

  • Relationship between perceived life satisfaction and adolescents’ substance abuse

    Keith J Zullig;Robert F Valois;E.Scott Huebner;John E Oeltmann

  • Relationships among school climate domains and school satisfaction

    Keith J. Zullig;E. Scott Huebner;Jon M. Patton

  • Physical activity behaviors and perceived life satisfaction among public high school adolescents.

    Robert F. Valois;Keith J. Zullig;E. Scott Huebner;J. Wanzer Drane

  • Relationship between life satisfaction and violent behaviors among adolescents.

    Valois Rf;Zullig Kj;Huebner Es;Drane Jw

  • The Association between Perceived Spirituality, Religiosity, and Life Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Self-Rated Health.

    Keith J. Zullig;Rose Marie Ward;Thelma Horn

  • Adolescent health-related quality of life and perceived satisfaction with life.

    Keith J. Zullig;Robert F. Valois;E. Scott Huebner;J. Wanzer Drane

  • The Relationship Between Life Satisfaction, Risk-Taking Behaviors, and Youth Violence

    John M. MacDonald;Alex R. Piquero;Robert F. Valois;Keith J. Zullig

  • The association between non-medical prescription drug use, depressive symptoms, and suicidality among college students.

    Keith J. Zullig;Amanda L. Divin

  • Life Satisfaction and Suicide Among High School Adolescents

    Robert F. Valois;Keith J. Zullig;E. Scott Huebner;J. Wanzer Drane

  • Brief Multidimensional Students' Life Satisfaction Scale: Sex, Race, and Grade Effects for a High School Sample

    E. Scott Huebner;Shannon Suldo;Robert F. Valois;J. Wanzer Drane

  • Perceived Quality of Life: A Neglected Component of Adolescent Health Assessment and Intervention.

    E.Scott Huebner;Robert F Valois;Shannon M Suldo;Laura C Smith

  • Life satisfaction and violent behaviors among middle school students

    Robert F. Valois;Raheem Jamaal Paxton;Keith J. Zullig;E. Scott Huebner

  • Association Between Life Satisfaction and Sexual Risk-Taking Behaviors Among Adolescents

    Robert F. Valois;Keith J. Zullig;E. Scott Huebner;Sandra K. Kammermann

  • Association Between Adolescent Suicide Ideation, Suicide Attempts and Emotional Self-Efficacy

    Robert F. Valois;Keith J. Zullig;Amy A. Hunter

  • Sexual orientation and disordered eating behaviors among self-identified male and female college students

    Molly R. Matthews-Ewald;Keith J. Zullig;Rose Marie Ward

  • Self-reported weight perceptions, dieting behavior, and breakfast eating among high school adolescents.

    Keith Zullig;Valerie A. Ubbes;Jennifer Pyle;Robert F. Valois

  • Adolescent distinctions between quality of life and self-rated health in quality of life research

    Keith J Zullig;Robert F Valois;J Wanzer Drane

  • Health-Related Quality of Life Among Central Appalachian Residents in Mountaintop Mining Counties

    Keith J. Zullig;Michael Hendryx

  • Validation of the brief multidimensional students' life satisfaction scale among college students.

    Keith J Zullig;E Scott Huebner;Rich Gilman;Jon M Patton

  • School Climate and Academic Achievement in Middle and High School Students

    Shay M. Daily;Michael J. Mann;Alfgeir L. Kristjansson;Megan L. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert F. Valois
Robert F. Valois University of South Carolina
E. Scott Huebner
E. Scott Huebner University of South Carolina
Alfgeir L. Kristjansson
Alfgeir L. Kristjansson West Virginia University
Ralph J. DiClemente
Ralph J. DiClemente New York University
Peter A. Vanable
Peter A. Vanable Syracuse University
Larry K. Brown
Larry K. Brown Brown University
Daniel Romer
Daniel Romer University of Pennsylvania
Thelma S. Horn
Thelma S. Horn Miami University
Stephen M. Davis
Stephen M. Davis University of Melbourne
Michael P. Carey
Michael P. Carey Brown University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens a gateway to diverse career pathways across the United States. Many students pursue these programs with the goal of becoming a licensed Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), but requirements can vary by state and even by city. For example, if you're interested in understanding mft requirements in New York City, you'll discover distinct educational and clinical experience criteria unique to that area.

Likewise, those planning to work in New Jersey should explore how to become an mft in Newark, which details local licensing processes and supervised practice mandates. If Virginia is your destination, learning about mft requirements in Norfolk is essential for meeting both educational prerequisites and examination standards.

Prospective therapists looking to establish a career in Nevada should review North Las Vegas mft certification requirements to ensure compliance with state regulations. Completing an online psychology degree provides a flexible foundation, but always check specific licensure requirements for your preferred location to achieve your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Keith J. Zullig

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles