World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
46
Citations
5582
World Ranking
5314
National Ranking
165

Amedeo Lancia publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amedeo Lancia sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 174 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Amedeo Lancia D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amedeo Lancia sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Capture of mercury ions by natural and industrial materials

    F. Di Natale;A. Lancia;A. Molino;M. Di Natale

  • Measuring induction period for calcium sulfate dihydrate precipitation

    Amedeo Lancia;Dino Musmarra;Marina Prisciandaro

  • Wet electrostatic scrubbers for the abatement of submicronic particulate

    Claudia Carotenuto;Francesco Di Natale;Amedeo Lancia

  • CO2 adsorption onto synthetic activated carbon: Kinetic, thermodynamic and regeneration studies

    M. Balsamo;T. Budinova;A. Erto;A. Lancia

  • Study of mercury absorption and desorption on sulfur impregnated carbon

    Despina Karatza;Amedeo Lancia;Dino Musmarra;Clelia Zucchini

  • Groundwater protection from cadmium contamination by permeable reactive barriers.

    F. Di Natale;M. Di Natale;R. Greco;A. Lancia

  • Degradation of ibuprofen by hydrodynamic cavitation: Reaction pathways and effect of operational parameters.

    Dino Musmarra;Marina Prisciandaro;Mauro Capocelli;Despina Karatza

  • Hydrodynamic cavitation of p-nitrophenol: A theoretical and experimental insight

    Mauro Capocelli;Marina Prisciandaro;Amedeo Lancia;Dino Musmarra

  • Heterogeneous condensation of submicron particles in a growth tube

    Marco Tammaro;Francesco Di Natale;Antonio Salluzzo;Amedeo Lancia

  • Capture of fine and ultrafine particles in a wet electrostatic scrubber

    Francesco Di Natale;Claudia Carotenuto;Luca D’Addio;Anatol Jaworek

  • Modeling flue gas desulfurization by spray-dry absorption

    Fabrizio Scala;Michele D'Ascenzo;Amedeo Lancia

  • Modeling of SO2 Absorption into Limestone Suspensions

    Amedeo Lancia;Dino Musmarra;Francesco Pepe

  • Carbon-supported ionic liquids as innovative adsorbents for CO2 separation from synthetic flue-gas

    Alessandro Erto;Ana Silvestre-Albero;Joaquín Silvestre-Albero;Francisco Rodríguez-Reinoso

  • Experimental and modelling analysis of seawater scrubbers for sulphur dioxide removal from flue-gas

    Domenico Flagiello;A. Erto;A. Lancia;F. Di Natale

  • Factors affecting the adsorption of trichloroethylene onto activated carbons

    A. Erto;R. Andreozzi;A. Lancia;D. Musmarra

  • Cadmium adsorption by coal combustion ashes-based sorbents—Relationship between sorbent properties and adsorption capacity

    Marco Balsamo;Francesco Di Natale;Alessandro Erto;Amedeo Lancia

  • Adsorption of Mercuric Chloride Vapours from Incinerator Flue Gases on Calcium Hydroxide Particles

    A. Lancia;D. Musmarra;F. Pepe;G. Volpicelli

  • Chemical effect of hydrodynamic cavitation: Simulation and experimental comparison

    Mauro Capocelli;Dino Musmarra;Marina Prisciandaro;Amedeo Lancia

  • Sonochemical degradation of estradiols: Incidence of ultrasonic frequency

    Mauro Capocelli;Eadaoin Joyce;Amedeo Lancia;Timothy J. Mason

  • A descriptive model for metallic ions adsorption from aqueous solutions onto activated carbons

    F. Di Natale;A. Erto;A. Lancia;D. Musmarra

  • Uncatalyzed heterogeneous oxidation of calcium bisulfite

    Amedeo Lancia;Dino Musmarra;Francesco Pepe

  • Model of oxygen absorption into calcium sulfite solutions

    Amedeo Lancia;Dino Musmarra;Francesco Pepe;Marina Prisciandaro

Frequent Co-Authors

Dino Musmarra
Dino Musmarra University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"
Alessandro Erto
Alessandro Erto University of Naples Federico II
Marina Prisciandaro
Marina Prisciandaro University of L'Aquila
Fabio Montagnaro
Fabio Montagnaro University of Naples Federico II
Fabrizio Scala
Fabrizio Scala University of Naples Federico II
Francisco Rodríguez-Reinoso
Francisco Rodríguez-Reinoso University of Alicante
Roberto Andreozzi
Roberto Andreozzi University of Naples Federico II
Joaquín Silvestre-Albero
Joaquín Silvestre-Albero University of Alicante
Riccardo Chirone
Riccardo Chirone National Research Council (CNR)
Maysam F. Abbod
Maysam F. Abbod Brunel University London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Amedeo Lancia

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles