World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 44 7209 6641 602 571 238 6875

Muthuraman Muthuraman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Muthuraman Muthuraman between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Muthuraman Muthuraman published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 15.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2022. 51 of the 296 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2022. 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 4 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 26 publications 2021: 28 publications 2022: 31 publications 2023: 25 publications 2024: 21 publications 2025: 30 publications
2007 2025

296 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Muthuraman Muthuraman: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 2
2008 2
2009 1
2010 4
2011 5
2012 10
2013 18
2014 16
2015 12
2016 16
2017 14
2018 13
2019 22
2020 26
2021 28
2022 31
2023 25
2024 21
2025 30
Total 296
Download as CSV

Muthuraman Muthuraman publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Muthuraman Muthuraman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 238–247 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 238 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203 238
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Muthuraman Muthuraman D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Muthuraman Muthuraman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478 44
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Muthuraman Muthuraman is affiliated with Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz in Germany. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with particular emphasis on Neurology and Cognitive Neuroscience. Their work also extends to Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, as well as Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

The main topics covered in their research include neurological disorders and treatments, Parkinson's disease mechanisms and treatments, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, neuroscience and neural engineering, functional brain connectivity studies, multiple sclerosis research studies, and neural dynamics and brain function.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Muthuraman include Sergiu Groppa, Gabriel González-Escamilla, Nabin Koirala, Jens Volkmann, and Bahman Nasseroleslami.

Their notable recent papers are:

  • "Translational value of choroid plexus imaging for tracking neuroinflammation in mice and humans," 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "#EEGManyLabs: Investigating the replicability of influential EEG experiments," 2021, Cortex
  • "Normative vs. patient-specific brain connectivity in deep brain stimulation," 2020, NeuroImage
  • "Clinical implications of serum neurofilament in newly diagnosed MS patients: A longitudinal multicentre cohort study," 2020, EBioMedicine
  • "Cross-frequency coupling between gamma oscillations and deep brain stimulation frequency in Parkinson's disease," 2020, Brain

The predominant journals and publication venues where Muthuraman's work appears include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Clinical Neurophysiology, Brain Communications, npj Parkinson's Disease, and Cerebral Cortex.

Best Publications

  • Questions and controversies in the study of time-varying functional connectivity in resting fMRI

    Daniel J. Lurie;Daniel Kessler;Danielle S. Bassett;Richard F. Betzel

  • Serum neurofilament light chain is a biomarker of acute and chronic neuronal damage in early multiple sclerosis.

    Nelly Siller;Jens Kuhle;Muthuraman Muthuraman;Christian Barro

  • Cortical involvement in the generation of essential tremor

    Jan Raethjen;R. B. Govindan;Florian Kopper;M. Muthuraman

  • Oscillating central motor networks in pathological tremors and voluntary movements. What makes the difference

    M. Muthuraman;Ulrich Heute;Kathrin Arning;Abdul Rauf Anwar

  • Graph Theoretical Framework of Brain Networks in Multiple Sclerosis: A Review of Concepts.

    Vinzenz Fleischer;Angela Radetz;Dumitru Ciolac;Muthuraman Muthuraman

  • NfL (Neurofilament Light Chain) Levels as a Predictive Marker for Long-Term Outcome After Ischemic Stroke

    Timo Uphaus;Stefan Bittner;Sonja Gröschel;Falk Steffen

  • Gait ataxia in essential tremor is differentially modulated by thalamic stimulation

    Alfonso Fasano;Jan Herzog;Jan Raethjen;Franziska E. M. Rose

  • Effective Connectivity of Cortical Sensorimotor Networks During Finger Movement Tasks: A Simultaneous fNIRS, fMRI, EEG Study.

    AR Anwar;Mark Muthalib;S Perrey;A Galka

  • Translational value of choroid plexus imaging for tracking neuroinflammation in mice and humans.

    Vinzenz Fleischer;Gabriel Gonzalez-Escamilla;Dumitru Ciolac;Philipp Albrecht

  • Cerebello-cortical network fingerprints differ between essential, Parkinson's and mimicked tremors.

    Muthuraman Muthuraman;Jan Raethjen;Nabin Koirala;Abdul Rauf Anwar;Abdul Rauf Anwar

  • Clinical implications of serum neurofilament in newly diagnosed MS patients: A longitudinal multicentre cohort study.

    Stefan Bittner;Falk Steffen;Timo Uphaus;Muthuraman Muthuraman

  • #EEGManyLabs : investigating the replicability of influential EEG experiments

    Yuri G. Pavlov;Nika Adamian;Stefan Appelhoff;Mahnaz Arvaneh

  • Normative vs. patient-specific brain connectivity in deep brain stimulation.

    Qiang Wang;Harith Akram;Muthuraman Muthuraman;Gabriel Gonzalez-Escamilla

  • Effect of high-frequency subthalamic neurostimulation on gait and freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    C. Schlenstedt;A. Shalash;A. Shalash;M. Muthuraman;M. Muthuraman;D. Falk

  • Deep Brain Stimulation and L-DOPA Therapy: Concepts of Action and Clinical Applications in Parkinson's Disease.

    Muthuraman Muthuraman;Nabin Koirala;Dumitru Ciolac;Bogdan Pintea

  • The clinical and electrophysiological investigation of tremor

    Unknown

  • Cross-frequency coupling between gamma oscillations and deep brain stimulation frequency in Parkinson's disease.

    Muthuraman Muthuraman;Manuel Bange;Nabin Koirala;Dumitru Ciolac

  • Patterned functional network disruption in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    Stefan Dukic;Stefan Dukic;Roisin McMackin;Teresa Buxo;Antonio Fasano

  • Structural Brain Network Characteristics Can Differentiate CIS from Early RRMS

    Muthuraman Muthuraman;Vinzenz Fleischer;Pierre Kolber;Felix Luessi

  • Local field potential activity dynamics in response to deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's disease.

    C. Wiest;G. Tinkhauser;A. Pogosyan;M. Bange

  • Increased structural white and grey matter network connectivity compensates for functional decline in early multiple sclerosis.

    Vinzenz Fleischer;Adriane Gröger;Nabin Koirala;Amgad Droby

  • Cortical correlates of the basic and first harmonic frequency of Parkinsonian tremor

    Jan Raethjen;R.B. Govindan;M. Muthuraman;Florian Kopper

  • A new diagnostic test to distinguish tremulous Parkinson's disease from advanced essential tremor†

    Muthuraman Muthuraman;Abdulnasir Hossen;Ulrich Heute;Günther Deuschl

  • Normative vs. patient-specific brain connectivity in Deep Brain Stimulation

    Qiang Wang;Harith Akram;Muthuraman Muthuraman;Gabriel Gonzalez-Escamilla

Frequent Co-Authors

Sergiu Groppa
Sergiu Groppa Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Günther Deuschl
Günther Deuschl Kiel University
Jan Raethjen
Jan Raethjen Kiel University
Michael Siniatchkin
Michael Siniatchkin Kiel University
Frauke Zipp
Frauke Zipp Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Orla Hardiman
Orla Hardiman Trinity College Dublin
Ulrich Stephani
Ulrich Stephani Kiel University
Sven G. Meuth
Sven G. Meuth University of Münster
Alfons Schnitzler
Alfons Schnitzler Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Stéphane Perrey
Stéphane Perrey University of Montpellier

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience can open the door to diverse career options in mental health and behavioral sciences. Many neuroscience graduates go on to pursue advanced degrees in counseling or psychology to deepen their expertise and improve their job prospects.

For those interested in a counseling career, there are most affordable online masters in mental health counseling programs that meet rigorous CACREP accreditation standards. Similarly, if you prefer the flexibility of distance learning, you’ll find a range of online mental health degree programs covering fields like substance abuse, school counseling, and more.

Those drawn to supporting families and couples may prefer to enroll in an lmft degree online program, which provides specialized training in marital and family therapy. Additionally, if you’re weighing the financial investment in graduate education, you can learn how much does it cost to get a masters in psychology to better plan your career pathway and manage educational expenses.

Best Scientists Citing Muthuraman Muthuraman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles