World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 44 7112 6549 597 566 249 8908

Sergiu Groppa publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sergiu Groppa between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sergiu Groppa published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 9.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 44 publications in 2024. 80 of the 326 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 44. Peak 44 publications in 2024. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 27 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 28 publications 2022: 34 publications 2023: 40 publications 2024: 44 publications 2025: 36 publications
1990 2025

326 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sergiu Groppa: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 1
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 1
2006 1
2007 2
2008 6
2009 8
2010 2
2011 3
2012 7
2013 2
2014 3
2015 4
2016 15
2017 15
2018 18
2019 27
2020 27
2021 28
2022 34
2023 40
2024 44
2025 36
Total 326
Download as CSV

Sergiu Groppa publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sergiu Groppa sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 248–257 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 249 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174 249
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Sergiu Groppa D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sergiu Groppa sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478 44
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Sergiu Groppa is affiliated with Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz in Germany. The research focus encompasses broad areas within medicine and neuroscience, with particular attention to neurology and its subfields.

The main fields of study for Sergiu Groppa include:

  • Medicine
  • Neuroscience

Specific subfields of study in their work comprise:

  • Neurology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

The central research topics cover:

  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Sergiu Groppa's publication record illustrates contributions to various prominent venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Neurology
  • Brain
  • Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface

Recent papers showcase work in both clinical and translational neuroscience areas:

  • Update on the diagnosis and treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) - revised recommendations of the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS). Part II: Attack therapy and long-term management, 2023, Journal of Neurology
  • Translational value of choroid plexus imaging for tracking neuroinflammation in mice and humans, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Normative vs. patient-specific brain connectivity in deep brain stimulation, 2020, NeuroImage
  • Clinical implications of serum neurofilament in newly diagnosed MS patients: A longitudinal multicentre cohort study, 2020, EBioMedicine
  • Complete Epstein-Barr virus seropositivity in a large cohort of patients with early multiple sclerosis, 2020, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Collaborations have involved several frequent coauthors, indicating a network of scientific partnerships. The most frequent co-authors are:

  • Gabriel González-Escamilla
  • Muthuraman Muthuraman
  • Sven G. Meuth
  • Vinzenz Fleischer
  • Yaroslav Winter

Best Publications

  • A practical guide to diagnostic transcranial magnetic stimulation: Report of an IFCN committee

    S. Groppa;A. Oliviero;A. Eisen;A. Quartarone

  • The resilience framework as a strategy to combat stress-related disorders

    Raffael Kalisch;Dewleen G. Baker;Dewleen G. Baker;Ulrike Basten;Ulrike Basten;Marco P. Boks

  • Consensus paper: Combining transcranial stimulation with neuroimaging

    Hartwig R. Siebner;Hartwig R. Siebner;Til O. Bergmann;Sven Bestmann;Sven Bestmann;Marcello Massimini

  • Serum neurofilament light chain is a biomarker of acute and chronic neuronal damage in early multiple sclerosis.

    Nelly Siller;Jens Kuhle;Muthuraman Muthuraman;Christian Barro

  • Physiological and anatomical decomposition of subthalamic neurostimulation effects in essential tremor

    Sergiu Groppa;Jan Herzog;Daniela Falk;Christian Riedel

  • Accelerated infarct development, cytogenesis and apoptosis following transient cerebral ischemia in aged rats

    Aurel Popa-Wagner;Irina Badan;Lary Walker;Sergiu Groppa

  • Graph Theoretical Framework of Brain Networks in Multiple Sclerosis: A Review of Concepts.

    Vinzenz Fleischer;Angela Radetz;Dumitru Ciolac;Muthuraman Muthuraman

  • Manual activity shapes structure and function in contralateral human motor hand area.

    Oliver Granert;Martin Peller;Christian Gaser;Sergiu Groppa

  • Translational value of choroid plexus imaging for tracking neuroinflammation in mice and humans.

    Vinzenz Fleischer;Gabriel Gonzalez-Escamilla;Dumitru Ciolac;Philipp Albrecht

  • Cerebello-cortical network fingerprints differ between essential, Parkinson's and mimicked tremors.

    Muthuraman Muthuraman;Jan Raethjen;Nabin Koirala;Abdul Rauf Anwar;Abdul Rauf Anwar

  • Clinical implications of serum neurofilament in newly diagnosed MS patients: A longitudinal multicentre cohort study.

    Stefan Bittner;Falk Steffen;Timo Uphaus;Muthuraman Muthuraman

  • The human dorsal premotor cortex facilitates the excitability of ipsilateral primary motor cortex via a short latency cortico-cortical route.

    Sergiu Groppa;Boris H. Schlaak;Alexander Münchau;Nicole Werner-Petroll

  • Normative vs. patient-specific brain connectivity in deep brain stimulation.

    Qiang Wang;Harith Akram;Muthuraman Muthuraman;Gabriel Gonzalez-Escamilla

  • A novel DCC mutation and genetic heterogeneity in congenital mirror movements

    C. Depienne;M. Cincotta;S. Billot;D. Bouteiller

  • Automated segmentation of changes in FLAIR-hyperintense white matter lesions in multiple sclerosis on serial magnetic resonance imaging.

    Paul Schmidt;Viola Pongratz;Pascal Küster;Dominik Meier

  • Complete Epstein-Barr virus seropositivity in a large cohort of patients with early multiple sclerosis.

    Sargis Abrahamyan;Sargis Abrahamyan;Bettina Eberspächer;Muna-Miriam Hoshi;Lilian Aly

  • RAD51 haploinsufficiency causes congenital mirror movements in humans.

    Christel Depienne;Delphine Bouteiller;Aurélie Méneret;Ségolène Billot

  • Deep Brain Stimulation and L-DOPA Therapy: Concepts of Action and Clinical Applications in Parkinson's Disease.

    Muthuraman Muthuraman;Nabin Koirala;Dumitru Ciolac;Bogdan Pintea

  • Cross-frequency coupling between gamma oscillations and deep brain stimulation frequency in Parkinson's disease.

    Muthuraman Muthuraman;Manuel Bange;Nabin Koirala;Dumitru Ciolac

  • Structural Brain Network Characteristics Can Differentiate CIS from Early RRMS

    Muthuraman Muthuraman;Vinzenz Fleischer;Pierre Kolber;Felix Luessi

  • A novel dual-site transcranial magnetic stimulation paradigm to probe fast facilitatory inputs from ipsilateral dorsal premotor cortex to primary motor cortex.

    Sergiu Groppa;Nicole Werner-Petroll;Alexander Münchau;Günther Deuschl

  • Acute changes in motor cortical excitability during slow oscillatory and constant anodal transcranial direct current stimulation.

    Til Ole Bergmann;Sergiu Groppa;Markus Seeger;Matthias Mölle

  • Normative vs. patient-specific brain connectivity in Deep Brain Stimulation

    Qiang Wang;Harith Akram;Muthuraman Muthuraman;Gabriel Gonzalez-Escamilla

Frequent Co-Authors

Muthuraman Muthuraman
Muthuraman Muthuraman Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Frauke Zipp
Frauke Zipp Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Günther Deuschl
Günther Deuschl Kiel University
Sven G. Meuth
Sven G. Meuth University of Münster
Hartwig R. Siebner
Hartwig R. Siebner Copenhagen University Hospital
Ulf Ziemann
Ulf Ziemann University of Tübingen
Heinz Wiendl
Heinz Wiendl University of Münster
Ralf Gold
Ralf Gold Ruhr University Bochum
Luisa Klotz
Luisa Klotz University Hospital Münster
Friedemann Paul
Friedemann Paul Charité - University Medicine Berlin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A neuroscience background opens doors to a variety of rewarding careers—many of which can be accessed and advanced through related online programs. Students interested in the intersection of brain science and society may consider pursuing an accelerated social work degree, which emphasizes supporting mental health and diversity in communities.

Understanding human behavior is also central to neuroscience. Many students find an online psychology degree to be a flexible path for deepening their knowledge of cognition, emotion, and behavior.

If you’re interested in counseling careers, consider cacrep schools for accredited, high-quality training in counseling psychology. These programs meet industry standards and prepare graduates for licensure.

Many students are also seeking budget-friendly options, and the opportunity to obtain an affordable master's in counseling online ensures financial accessibility without sacrificing quality. Choosing the right online program can significantly enhance your neuroscience foundation and expand your career pathways across research, therapy, social work, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Sergiu Groppa

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles