World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
44
Citations
8908
World Ranking
7112
National Ranking
597

Sergiu Groppa publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sergiu Groppa sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 249 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Sergiu Groppa D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sergiu Groppa sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sergiu Groppa is affiliated with Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz in Germany. The research focus encompasses broad areas within medicine and neuroscience, with particular attention to neurology and its subfields.

The main fields of study for Sergiu Groppa include:

  • Medicine
  • Neuroscience

Specific subfields of study in their work comprise:

  • Neurology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

The central research topics cover:

  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Sergiu Groppa's publication record illustrates contributions to various prominent venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Neurology
  • Brain
  • Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface

Recent papers showcase work in both clinical and translational neuroscience areas:

  • Update on the diagnosis and treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) - revised recommendations of the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS). Part II: Attack therapy and long-term management, 2023, Journal of Neurology
  • Translational value of choroid plexus imaging for tracking neuroinflammation in mice and humans, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Normative vs. patient-specific brain connectivity in deep brain stimulation, 2020, NeuroImage
  • Clinical implications of serum neurofilament in newly diagnosed MS patients: A longitudinal multicentre cohort study, 2020, EBioMedicine
  • Complete Epstein-Barr virus seropositivity in a large cohort of patients with early multiple sclerosis, 2020, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Collaborations have involved several frequent coauthors, indicating a network of scientific partnerships. The most frequent co-authors are:

  • Gabriel González-Escamilla
  • Muthuraman Muthuraman
  • Sven G. Meuth
  • Vinzenz Fleischer
  • Yaroslav Winter

Best Publications

  • A practical guide to diagnostic transcranial magnetic stimulation: Report of an IFCN committee

    S. Groppa;A. Oliviero;A. Eisen;A. Quartarone

  • The resilience framework as a strategy to combat stress-related disorders

    Raffael Kalisch;Dewleen G. Baker;Dewleen G. Baker;Ulrike Basten;Ulrike Basten;Marco P. Boks

  • Consensus paper: Combining transcranial stimulation with neuroimaging

    Hartwig R. Siebner;Hartwig R. Siebner;Til O. Bergmann;Sven Bestmann;Sven Bestmann;Marcello Massimini

  • Serum neurofilament light chain is a biomarker of acute and chronic neuronal damage in early multiple sclerosis.

    Nelly Siller;Jens Kuhle;Muthuraman Muthuraman;Christian Barro

  • Physiological and anatomical decomposition of subthalamic neurostimulation effects in essential tremor

    Sergiu Groppa;Jan Herzog;Daniela Falk;Christian Riedel

  • Accelerated infarct development, cytogenesis and apoptosis following transient cerebral ischemia in aged rats

    Aurel Popa-Wagner;Irina Badan;Lary Walker;Sergiu Groppa

  • Graph Theoretical Framework of Brain Networks in Multiple Sclerosis: A Review of Concepts.

    Vinzenz Fleischer;Angela Radetz;Dumitru Ciolac;Muthuraman Muthuraman

  • Manual activity shapes structure and function in contralateral human motor hand area.

    Oliver Granert;Martin Peller;Christian Gaser;Sergiu Groppa

  • Translational value of choroid plexus imaging for tracking neuroinflammation in mice and humans.

    Vinzenz Fleischer;Gabriel Gonzalez-Escamilla;Dumitru Ciolac;Philipp Albrecht

  • Cerebello-cortical network fingerprints differ between essential, Parkinson's and mimicked tremors.

    Muthuraman Muthuraman;Jan Raethjen;Nabin Koirala;Abdul Rauf Anwar;Abdul Rauf Anwar

  • Clinical implications of serum neurofilament in newly diagnosed MS patients: A longitudinal multicentre cohort study.

    Stefan Bittner;Falk Steffen;Timo Uphaus;Muthuraman Muthuraman

  • The human dorsal premotor cortex facilitates the excitability of ipsilateral primary motor cortex via a short latency cortico-cortical route.

    Sergiu Groppa;Boris H. Schlaak;Alexander Münchau;Nicole Werner-Petroll

  • Normative vs. patient-specific brain connectivity in deep brain stimulation.

    Qiang Wang;Harith Akram;Muthuraman Muthuraman;Gabriel Gonzalez-Escamilla

  • A novel DCC mutation and genetic heterogeneity in congenital mirror movements

    C. Depienne;M. Cincotta;S. Billot;D. Bouteiller

  • Automated segmentation of changes in FLAIR-hyperintense white matter lesions in multiple sclerosis on serial magnetic resonance imaging.

    Paul Schmidt;Viola Pongratz;Pascal Küster;Dominik Meier

  • Complete Epstein-Barr virus seropositivity in a large cohort of patients with early multiple sclerosis.

    Sargis Abrahamyan;Sargis Abrahamyan;Bettina Eberspächer;Muna-Miriam Hoshi;Lilian Aly

  • RAD51 haploinsufficiency causes congenital mirror movements in humans.

    Christel Depienne;Delphine Bouteiller;Aurélie Méneret;Ségolène Billot

  • Deep Brain Stimulation and L-DOPA Therapy: Concepts of Action and Clinical Applications in Parkinson's Disease.

    Muthuraman Muthuraman;Nabin Koirala;Dumitru Ciolac;Bogdan Pintea

  • Cross-frequency coupling between gamma oscillations and deep brain stimulation frequency in Parkinson's disease.

    Muthuraman Muthuraman;Manuel Bange;Nabin Koirala;Dumitru Ciolac

  • Structural Brain Network Characteristics Can Differentiate CIS from Early RRMS

    Muthuraman Muthuraman;Vinzenz Fleischer;Pierre Kolber;Felix Luessi

  • A novel dual-site transcranial magnetic stimulation paradigm to probe fast facilitatory inputs from ipsilateral dorsal premotor cortex to primary motor cortex.

    Sergiu Groppa;Nicole Werner-Petroll;Alexander Münchau;Günther Deuschl

  • Acute changes in motor cortical excitability during slow oscillatory and constant anodal transcranial direct current stimulation.

    Til Ole Bergmann;Sergiu Groppa;Markus Seeger;Matthias Mölle

  • Normative vs. patient-specific brain connectivity in Deep Brain Stimulation

    Qiang Wang;Harith Akram;Muthuraman Muthuraman;Gabriel Gonzalez-Escamilla

Frequent Co-Authors

Muthuraman Muthuraman
Muthuraman Muthuraman Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Frauke Zipp
Frauke Zipp Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Günther Deuschl
Günther Deuschl Kiel University
Sven G. Meuth
Sven G. Meuth University of Münster
Hartwig R. Siebner
Hartwig R. Siebner Copenhagen University Hospital
Ulf Ziemann
Ulf Ziemann University of Tübingen
Heinz Wiendl
Heinz Wiendl University of Münster
Ralf Gold
Ralf Gold Ruhr University Bochum
Luisa Klotz
Luisa Klotz University Hospital Münster
Friedemann Paul
Friedemann Paul Charité - University Medicine Berlin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A neuroscience background opens doors to a variety of rewarding careers—many of which can be accessed and advanced through related online programs. Students interested in the intersection of brain science and society may consider pursuing an accelerated social work degree, which emphasizes supporting mental health and diversity in communities.

Understanding human behavior is also central to neuroscience. Many students find an online psychology degree to be a flexible path for deepening their knowledge of cognition, emotion, and behavior.

If you’re interested in counseling careers, consider cacrep schools for accredited, high-quality training in counseling psychology. These programs meet industry standards and prepare graduates for licensure.

Many students are also seeking budget-friendly options, and the opportunity to obtain an affordable master's in counseling online ensures financial accessibility without sacrificing quality. Choosing the right online program can significantly enhance your neuroscience foundation and expand your career pathways across research, therapy, social work, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Sergiu Groppa

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles